These two statements don't contradict? Seriously? One says her palms were NOT contaminated with blood and the other that they weren't contaminated APART from blood but according to you, they're saying the same thing? Really?? 
If he wrote that her palms and fingers had blood in his notes then it would contradict what he wrote in his report. It doesn't, he didn't specify in the notes where the blood was because the notes because he didn't need to. He knew where. When he wrote the report he expressly stated where he blood was.
You want to ignore his specific details written later for official purposes to something less specific written earlier for his own benefit. It would be like taking some of my notes that are less specific and trying to use them to say I meant something different in my final product becaus eof what i wrote in my notes. In my final product I make sure to clarify points so others can understand them my notes are general because they are just for my benefit and I know what i mean I can just use a few words and fill in the meat later.
He's not the only one who said she had no blood on her fingers or inside palms mind you.
At best notes can be used to question someone to ask what they meant. They can't be used on their own to disprove what they assessed in official form. Why did you write.. what did you mean by this...Where was the blood...
We know what he would answer if asked because he clarified in his report.
