The Murders at White House Farm - By Carol Ann Lee (A Taster!)

[Jan]

It depends who gets pipped at the post when new information does materialise. Maybe then we'll get some semblance of truth.
So many conflicting views and posts on different sites. Only yesterday I read a post on another site/forum and the poster spoke of the police hearing a shot from within WHF at appx 07.00 before the raid team entered at 07.30 or thereabouts.
This is the first time I'd read about it and the poster in question has written some brilliant and very knowledgeable posts.
Anyone else heard this version ? Seemingly,it was when the loud-hailer was in use.

so what is the source of the information?

[Caroline]

I think because we are looking for something new - either way-  not just the information we have already seen re-written and then somebody ( a writer) forming an opinion.

But to be honest - I don't think that is going to happen .

Neither do I - but (and whether you like him or not), PH made it clear that he had changed from innocent to guilty. He needed to promote his book so is hardly going to say "By the way, there's nothing really new here". I think being disappointed is fair enough but not sure why anyone should feel 'let down' - he wrote the book for himself as part of his career, not for anyone on this forum. I helped him with part of it (incidentally - my contribution was from when I thought Jeremy was innocent), and didn't even get a signed copy, do I feel let down? Nah! 

[lookout]

 Not having read the full forum,only odd snippets from this particular poster,I wouldn't know where his/her source came from as yet. I'm assuming it's possibly a male poster who's on a forum with another poster ( guilter,Odysseus ) Can't remember the name of the other poster.

[Adam]

Neither do I - but (and whether you like him or not), PH made it clear that he had changed from innocent to guilty. He needed to promote his book so is hardly going to say "By the way, there's nothing really new here". I think being disappointed is fair enough but not sure why anyone should feel 'let down' - he wrote the book for himself as part of his career, not for anyone on this forum. I helped him with part of it (incidentally - my contribution was from when I thought Jeremy was innocent), and didn't even get a signed copy, do I feel let down? Nah! 

So you couldn't even persuade PH  to maintain his innocence stance. When you thought Bamber was innocent.

[Caroline]

It depends who gets pipped at the post when new information does materialise. Maybe then we'll get some semblance of truth.
So many conflicting views and posts on different sites. Only yesterday I read a post on another site/forum and the poster spoke of the police hearing a shot from within WHF at appx 07.00 before the raid team entered at 07.30 or thereabouts.
This is the first time I'd read about it and the poster in question has written some brilliant and very knowledgeable posts.
Anyone else heard this version ? Seemingly,it was when the loud-hailer was in use.

More unsubstantiated rumour!

[lookout]

Found it-----------Injustice Anywhere and the poster is Supernaut

[Adam]

I doubt that PH went into the book believing Bamber was innocent.

He would have done research beforehand so would know the score.

Saying he went from innocent to guilty is just publicity. It makes it seem like he has discovered the smoking gun.

[maggie]

Neither do I - but (and whether you like him or not), PH made it clear that he had changed from innocent to guilty. He needed to promote his book so is hardly going to say "By the way, there's nothing really new here". I think being disappointed is fair enough but not sure why anyone should feel 'let down' - he wrote the book for himself as part of his career, not for anyone on this forum. I helped him with part of it (incidentally - my contribution was from when I thought Jeremy was innocent), and didn't even get a signed copy, do I feel let down? Nah! 

Yes, I recognised a few things Caroline, the palm print on the bible and  Vanezis' written statement for two    Heady days 

[Jan]

I doubt that PH went into the book believing Bamber was innocent.

He would have done research beforehand so would know the score.

Saying he went from innocent to guilty is just publicity. It makes it seem like he has discovered the smoking gun.

He said he did - and I am sure he would not lie for publicity - his book would have probably sold more if he had stuck to that opinion because less people would be interested in a book that says there is a murderer in jail and yes he is guilty?

[Caroline]

So you couldn't even persuade PH  to maintain his innocence stance. When you thought Bamber was innocent.

Why would I be trying to persuade anyone to change their opinion? What REALLY makes me laugh is that you believe you have the ability to effect change, when in reality most people simply roll their eyes when you post  - pathetic little man! 

[Caroline]

Yes, I recognised a few things Caroline, the palm print on the bible and  Vanezis' written statement for two    Heady days 

Yes, we used to have some good debates then - before the arrival of a certain ............. 

[Adam]

Why would I be trying to persuade anyone to change their opinion? What REALLY makes me laugh is that you believe you have the ability to effect change, when in reality most people simply roll their eyes when you post  - pathetic little man! 

No you couldn't make him keep the same 'innocent' opinion.

He must have read my posts and threads.

[lookout]

Found it-----------Injustice Anywhere and the poster is Supernaut

Also--------wronglyaccusedperson.org.uk/media-Jeremy bamber.

[Caroline]

No you couldn't make him keep the same 'innocent' opinion.

He must have read my posts and threads.

he thinks  you're an idiot - I concur!

[lookout]

More unsubstantiated rumour!

It ALL is,isn't it ?