Author Topic: Who gained the most  (Read 10840 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

John

  • Guest
Re: Who gained the most
« Reply #15 on: April 21, 2011, 07:46:PM »
I don't understand what you mean by sell up Cliff.  Jeremy was never in a position to sell anything as far as I understand.
What I was implying that if JB had got the inheritence he may have sold up, which would have left the Boutflours out on a limb.I wont go further than that as I think it has been done to death. Respectfully no pun intended.

They would have most certainly been worse off Cliff than they are now but it would have made no difference to their existing activities.  Although, in saying that you have to remember that Nevill secretly bailed Peter Eaton out when he was in difficulties and as a consequence owned half of his farm.  Had Jeremy decided to sell and had he known about the agreement with Peter Eaton, that would have put Peter in dire straits.


sandy

  • Guest
Re: Who gained the most
« Reply #16 on: April 21, 2011, 07:49:PM »
Sandy as you seem to wealth of knowledge about the family and wills etc would you say at the same time as the murders the family were having financial problems

Would you agree the argument between Neville and Peter was over a land deal wasn't it

Would you also agree it was a huge coincidence that the silencer was found in a cupboard already searched by the police by the family at the same time they had financial problems

Yes
Yes
No ...the police thought it was a suicide so never searched the cupboard for any evidence.

clifford

  • Guest
Re: Who gained the most
« Reply #17 on: April 21, 2011, 07:50:PM »
Sandy as you seem to wealth of knowledge about the family and wills etc would you say at the same time as the murders the family were having financial problems

Would you agree the argument between Neville and Peter was over a land deal wasn't it

Would you also agree it was a huge coincidence that the silencer was found in a cupboard already searched by the police by the family at the same time they had financial problems
Glad I did,nt go further. Jackie have you no fear of smites.

Offline jon

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1437
Re: Who gained the most
« Reply #18 on: April 21, 2011, 07:51:PM »
Sandy as you seem to wealth of knowledge about the family and wills etc would you say at the same time as the murders the family were having financial problems

Would you agree the argument between Neville and Peter was over a land deal wasn't it

Would you also agree it was a huge coincidence that the silencer was found in a cupboard already searched by the police by the family at the same time they had financial problems

Yes
Yes
No ...the police thought it was a suicide so never searched the cupboard for any evidence.
Didnt they fingerprint inside the cupboard ?

Jackiepreece

  • Guest
Re: Who gained the most
« Reply #19 on: April 21, 2011, 07:53:PM »
Sandy as you know there are many thousands of photos and documents still held under PII if anything was found in those documents that once and for all proved Jeremys innocence if he got everything back where would the family live and have they got any money of there own and furthermore if it was proved they planted the silencer would everything they own go to Jeremy

sandy

  • Guest
Re: Who gained the most
« Reply #20 on: April 21, 2011, 07:53:PM »
Sandy as you seem to wealth of knowledge about the family and wills etc would you say at the same time as the murders the family were having financial problems

Would you agree the argument between Neville and Peter was over a land deal wasn't it

Would you also agree it was a huge coincidence that the silencer was found in a cupboard already searched by the police by the family at the same time they had financial problems

Yes
Yes
No ...the police thought it was a suicide so never searched the cupboard for any evidence.
Didnt they fingerprint inside the cupboard ?

Why?

clifford

  • Guest
Re: Who gained the most
« Reply #21 on: April 21, 2011, 07:55:PM »
Sandy as you seem to wealth of knowledge about the family and wills etc would you say at the same time as the murders the family were having financial problems

Would you agree the argument between Neville and Peter was over a land deal wasn't it

Would you also agree it was a huge coincidence that the silencer was found in a cupboard already searched by the police by the family at the same time they had financial problems

Yes
Yes
No ...the police thought it was a suicide so never searched the cupboard for any evidence.
Didnt they fingerprint inside the cupboard ?
Doubt it they did,nt do anything right. probably had the kettle on.

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Re: Who gained the most
« Reply #22 on: April 21, 2011, 07:56:PM »
Sandy as you seem to wealth of knowledge about the family and wills etc would you say at the same time as the murders the family were having financial problems

Would you agree the argument between Neville and Peter was over a land deal wasn't it

Would you also agree it was a huge coincidence that the silencer was found in a cupboard already searched by the police by the family at the same time they had financial problems

And why did they TAKE the silencer they allegedly found with them - and why keep it for days before handing it over to the police? Why not notify the police right after discovering it and let them come and pick up the silencer WITHOUT FIDGETING WITH IT!!
This family was a little too "proactive" in my honest view. Their actions DO raise doubt - they just do.

Offline jon

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1437
Re: Who gained the most
« Reply #23 on: April 21, 2011, 07:57:PM »
Sandy as you seem to wealth of knowledge about the family and wills etc would you say at the same time as the murders the family were having financial problems

Would you agree the argument between Neville and Peter was over a land deal wasn't it

Would you also agree it was a huge coincidence that the silencer was found in a cupboard already searched by the police by the family at the same time they had financial problems

Yes
Yes
No ...the police thought it was a suicide so never searched the cupboard for any evidence.
Didnt they fingerprint inside the cupboard ?

Why?
I think you will find somebody made a statement saying they got fingerprint dust on their hands before the silencer was found . From inside the said cupboard

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6961
Re: Who gained the most
« Reply #24 on: April 21, 2011, 07:57:PM »
Sandy as you seem to wealth of knowledge about the family and wills etc would you say at the same time as the murders the family were having financial problems

Would you agree the argument between Neville and Peter was over a land deal wasn't it

Would you also agree it was a huge coincidence that the silencer was found in a cupboard already searched by the police by the family at the same time they had financial problems

Yes
Yes
No ...the police thought it was a suicide so never searched the cupboard for any evidence.
Didnt they fingerprint inside the cupboard ?

Why?
I think you will find somebody made a statement saying they got fingerprint dust on their hands before the silencer was found . From inside the said cupboard

I thought the place wasn't fingerprinted until after the silencer was found.

sandy

  • Guest
Re: Who gained the most
« Reply #25 on: April 21, 2011, 07:58:PM »
Sandy as you know there are many thousands of photos and documents still held under PII if anything was found in those documents that once and for all proved Jeremys innocence if he got everything back where would the family live and have they got any money of there own and furthermore if it was proved they planted the silencer would everything they own go to Jeremy

Gee whiz jackie, now you are way ahead of yourself.

If Jeremy was proven innocent he would get back what he is entitled to plus interest plus damages and that would have to be established as a matter of negotiation in a civil court.

If that happened the Boutflours and the Eatons would be in diffs for sure.


Offline jon

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1437
Re: Who gained the most
« Reply #26 on: April 21, 2011, 07:59:PM »
Sandy as you seem to wealth of knowledge about the family and wills etc would you say at the same time as the murders the family were having financial problems

Would you agree the argument between Neville and Peter was over a land deal wasn't it

Would you also agree it was a huge coincidence that the silencer was found in a cupboard already searched by the police by the family at the same time they had financial problems

Yes
Yes
No ...the police thought it was a suicide so never searched the cupboard for any evidence.
Didnt they fingerprint inside the cupboard ?

Why?
I think you will find somebody made a statement saying they got fingerprint dust on their hands before the silencer was found . From inside the said cupboard

I thought the place wasn't fingerprinted until after the silencer was found.
No i read it on here will look for you!!

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6961
Re: Who gained the most
« Reply #27 on: April 21, 2011, 07:59:PM »
Sandy as you know there are many thousands of photos and documents still held under PII if anything was found in those documents that once and for all proved Jeremys innocence if he got everything back where would the family live and have they got any money of there own and furthermore if it was proved they planted the silencer would everything they own go to Jeremy

If they planted the silencer, the money would be the least of their worries Jackie. One has to be careful about implying anything of the kind of course.

clifford

  • Guest
Re: Who gained the most
« Reply #28 on: April 21, 2011, 08:01:PM »
Sandy as you know there are many thousands of photos and documents still held under PII if anything was found in those documents that once and for all proved Jeremys innocence if he got everything back where would the family live and have they got any money of there own and furthermore if it was proved they planted the silencer would everything they own go to Jeremy

Gee whiz jackie, now you are way ahead of yourself.

If Jeremy was proven innocent he would get back what he is entitled to plus interest plus damages and that would have to be established as a matter of negotiation in a civil court.

If that happened the Boutflours and the Eatons would be in diffs for sure.
Thought they were going abroad.[just in case]

sandy

  • Guest
Re: Who gained the most
« Reply #29 on: April 21, 2011, 08:02:PM »
Sandy as you know there are many thousands of photos and documents still held under PII if anything was found in those documents that once and for all proved Jeremys innocence if he got everything back where would the family live and have they got any money of there own and furthermore if it was proved they planted the silencer would everything they own go to Jeremy

If they planted the silencer, the money would be the least of their worries Jackie. One has to be careful about implying anything of the kind of course.

I think we can forget such nonsense.  It would be daft for someone to plant a silencer with blood and paint on it just to attempt to incriminate Jeremy.  What if the police had already taken note of the cupboard or even photographed it?  Would they look a right nanny then?