Police log contents, and position of bodies in photographs don't add up, CRIKEY.

[Caroline]

My partner, is the most laid back person I know, doesn't get emotional or stressed out easily I rarely disuss the Bamber case with him because he's not interested BUT, I just asked him what he would do if he received a call at around 3am under the same circumstances and ....... he's call 999. I have asked other and not mentioned Bamber, just similar circumstances - and ALL would call 999!!

[Adam]

Supporters say he called Julie for advice. Why ?

He had apparently already called the police and been told what to do.

He has never said himself he called her for advice. Saying 'no comment' when interviewed. Then testifying he called her to 'hear a friendly voice'.

Why would he need advice  ? He was an independent 24 year old man.

The phone may not be answered. It was 3am.

The phone may not be answered for a long time. Wasting time. It was 3am.

Julie would not be a 'friendly voice', or give advice after being woken. It was 3am.

Julie would not be able to give any good advice. It was not her family, she was in Lewisham and had just been woken up.

Julie could not call back later or assist in any way at WHF. She was in Lewisham at 3am.


In short there is no reason to phone Julie apart from to boast about what he had done. The excitement and adrenalin was pumping and he couldn't resist - 'Everything is going well, there is something wrong at the farm, I haven't slept all night'.

[Adam]

As far as I know Jeremy has never said what he said to Julie. There is nothing on the OS. Unlike Julie who gave the exact words, as far as she could remember.

[lookout]

Strange how people believed what Julie had said---------------except for her husband.!

[Adam]

Obviously Jeremy must have said something to Julie. Otherwise she would not know it was him.

If he had just called to hear a friendly voice perhaps he said -

'My dad's just rang, he said 'Sheila's gone crazy and she's got the gun. He wants me to go over.  The police have told me to meet them there. I am worried and wanted to hear you're 'friendly voice' before I leave. Love you lots'.

If that is what he said why did Julie tell him to 'go back to bed' ?

[Caroline]

Strange how people believed what Julie had said---------------except for her husband.!

Now how would you or anyone else on this board know what Julie's husband thinks? A throw away comment by Jackie last year has you thinking that he's about to go public. You don't need to get permission to mention it on the board Lookout, she already mentioned it. I have a good memory!

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,5962.msg265299.html#msg265299

[lookout]

Now how would you or anyone else on this board know what Julie's husband thinks? A throw away comment by Jackie last year has you thinking that he's about to go public. You don't need to get permission to mention it on the board Lookout, she already mentioned it. I have a good memory!

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,5962.msg265299.html#msg265299

The source didn't originate from Jackie though. It happened to have been a handwritten item which had been received by someone else.

[guest154]

The source didn't originate from Jackie though. It happened to have been a handwritten item which had been received by someone else.

Hopefully this source is a little more reliable than the source you claimed told you information about Neville's pyjama top ( a source you claimed was knowledgeable and in the know) and turned out to be a complete fabrication - which NGB kindly corrected for us.

Although the only two people gossiping about Julies marriage on the internet are JACKIE AND LOOKOUT which says it all really, members can decide for themselves how much ANY of their posts have ever been evidence based or stood up to the "honesty test".

[Caroline]

The source didn't originate from Jackie though. It happened to have been a handwritten item which had been received by someone else.

Yeah!  - You honestly think that Julie's husband is going to leak personal information about his life to a supporter of JB? Seriously? 

[lookout]

It certainly wasn't gossip !!

[lookout]

Neither was it gossip that a moderator was " found " a month after the murders,at the same time that scratches under the mantelpiece were found ??

[guest154]

Yeah!  - You honestly think that Julie's husband is going to leak personal information about his life to a supporter of JB? Seriously? 

Exactly. Pull the other one comes to mind. Don't know why supporters do this.    It's sad really.

[lookout]

You're sad !!

[scipio_usmc]

Neither was it gossip that a moderator was " found " a month after the murders,at the same time that scratches under the mantelpiece were found ??

You demonstrate dailty that you don't even know the basic facts of this case.

Murders- Aug 7
Moderator found- Aug 10
Moderator collected by police- Aug 12
Moderator taken to the lab and tested by the lab- Aug 13
Lab contacted police to tell them human blood was found on/in the moderator and red paint on the knurled tip-the police then went to WHF to take paint samples to find out where the red paint was from- Aug 14

The moderator was found 3 days after the murder when a thorough job was being done to clean the place out. 

[scipio_usmc]

It certainly wasn't gossip !!

It's nonsense. The notion he would write to anyone to say he didn't believe Julie is absurd but especially a Jeremy supporter.  Jeremy supporters have nothing to justify their position so make up nonsense including a letter that even if true would mean nothing at all because her husband's uninformed opinion doesn't mean squat.  Jeremy supporters put forth absurd claims of police shooting the victims and all sorts of other nonsense in an effort to pretend Jeremy is innocent.