Exhibits from the family

[guest154]

Errrm, given that Jeremy is already convicted, I think the onus is on those who think is innocent to PROVE IT!!

They've been trying and failing for years. I can't think of one good arguement that has been brought up.

[lookout]

What's the point,then,in debating ??

[Caroline]

What's the point,then,in debating ??

The onus on you and other supporters is to produce a valid argument for innocence.

[Jan]

The onus on you and other supporters is to produce a valid argument for innocence.

Crikey Caroline you sound just like Scipio. This is a forum for discussion not a court.

[scipio_usmc]

Crikey Caroline you sound just like Scipio. This is a forum for discussion not a court.

The burden of proof in a debate rests with the proponent.  This is not merely in court but a general rule. 

[lookout]

Jan's right.It is like a ruddy courtroom---------------as if it mattered 

[Caroline]

Crikey Caroline you sound just like Scipio. This is a forum for discussion not a court.

Is it?

[Alias]

They've been trying and failing for years. I can't think of one good arguement that has been brought up.

Why are you trying to  come up with one - 30, yes, thirty years after?
My answer= he probably didn´t do it.

[guest154]

Why are you trying to  come up with one - 30, yes, thirty years after?

Not sure what your post means, doesn't make much sense to me. I'm not trying to come up with anything. The point was supporters coming up with a good evidence based argument and the fact that they never have.

[Alias]

Why are you trying to prove that someone who already has a life sentence, the harshest you can get, is guilty?
Must be a doubt in your heart.

[guest154]

Why are you trying to prove that someone who already has a life sentence, the harshest you can get, is guilty?
Must be a doubt in your heart.

There is no doubt, there is enough evidence to prove guilt 100% for me. I am honest about my position on the case, I think he is guilty.
Why do people talk about The Yorkshire Ripper? Charles Manson? Bronson? NOT because they think they are innocent - but there are those that believe those killers are innocent.

The insane theories by some supporters don't knock my belief in his guilt. The 2002 appeal (which gives you an insight into what the defence have) doesn't knock my belief in his guilt.

It's all mirrors and smoke screens and none of it is backed up by ANYTHING if you look into it deeply, you may be tricked by it and have doubt because of it - but I certainly don't.

[Alias]

But you are still talking about it = doubt.

[Alias]

Honestly I dont think JB did it. Its just a feeling

[Alias]

Honesty is - honesty

[Caroline]

Why are you trying to prove that someone who already has a life sentence, the harshest you can get, is guilty?
Must be a doubt in your heart.

OH!! not this old chestnut - reason being that people are STILL making excuses for him. By the way, those 200 boxes? Jeremy has admitted to having seen most of!