Michael Fielder Proven liar

[Caroline]

did fielder say this in the orgnal aritcal or in later interviews.

He mentioned it in the original article or how would Colin mention it in his statement that he made a few days after the article appeared in the Sun?

[Jane]

dont you think in all the years of somone else of the guilty persauision would of pointed out all these documents and sources if they were real.

OK. So it seems that now you're saying that anyone else who posts words on white paper are posting the genuine thing but Scipio posts fakes!!!! Are you also suggesting that he goes to the bother of faking them himself?!!!!!

[scipio_usmc]

dont you think in all the years of somone else of the guilty persauision would of pointed out all these documents and sources if they were real.

People in the "guilty camp" have LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONG pointed out that the log expressly states no response was received by the police.  I am not by any stretch the first to notice this and raise it.

Nor am I the first to notice that these log entries don't actually state where the 5 bodies were found neither entry says whether bodies were upstairs or downstairs.





Nor am I the first to notice that the raid team declared they saw June's body second, before they even went fully upstairs by using a primitive periscope. Nor am I the first to note that by the time of the first message the raid team had already found Nevill and June hence why they said male and female found so far.

My points are not new everything I raise has been raised previously.  It is not my fault that old disproved points keep being raised again and again but that necessitates me reraising the rebuttals used in the past.

 
 

[scipio_usmc]

Now Nugs is saying documents posted by another poster have been falsely drawn up. But has no evidence to back this up.

They may have told you not to call nugs names or something but certainly didn't tell you that you can't try to disprove his posts by using evidence.   I may fight in the trenches with people but at least I do so by posting arguments and evidence I don't simply call people names and that's it.

I think nugs embarrassed himself enough by not recognizing the log I posted from was originally posted here by Mike and suggesting it is fake. There isn't any great need to pile on even more. 

If there is any doubt at all as to who posted it this should end that:

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,732.0.html

[Caroline]

They may have told you not to call nugs names or something but certainly didn't tell you that you can't try to disprove his posts by using evidence.   I may fight in the trenches with people but at least I do so by posting arguments and evidence I don't simply call people names and that's it.

I think nugs embarrassed himself enough by not recognizing the log I posted from was originally posted here by Mike and suggesting it is fake. There isn't any great need to pile on even more. 

If there is any doubt at all as to who posted it this should end that:

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,732.0.html

The log you posted was written by Bonnet, it's on the back of the log he wrote from the call received from West.

[maggie]

Adam can you please stop making personal remarks about posters, stirring and dragging up old grievances.  I have removed the offending posts.

[Adam]

Adam can you please stop making personal remarks about posters, stirring and dragging up old grievances.  I have removed the offending posts.

Of course Maggie.

We can all just discuss the current issue. Whether the documents Scipio posted are fake, as Nugs claims.

[maggie]

Of course Maggie.

We can all just discuss the current issue. Whether the documents Scipio posted are fake, as Nugs claims.

Thank you Adam.

[Caroline]

Well, that was awkward 

[Adam]

Well, that was awkward 

April always requests I am banned whenever I post the truth about Nugs.

Although she happy to let him claim documents posted by Scipio are fake or have him call my posts 'bullshit' while I am offline. 

Maybe they were buddies when she was a Jeremy supporter.

Anyway, hopefully Nugs will elaborate on his fake documents claim on this thread. And also answer my question on the David Boutflour thread he created. I cannot see how this thread supports guilt or innocence. In other words what was the point ?

[Jane]

April always requests I am banned whenever I post the truth about Nugs.

Although she happy to let him claim documents posted by Scipio are fake or have him call my posts 'bullshit' while I am offline. 

Maybe they were buddies when she was a Jeremy supporter.

Anyway, hopefully Nugs will elaborate on his fake documents claim on this thread. And also answer my question on the David Boutflour thread he created. I cannot see how this thread supports guilt or innocence.

Do you have literacy problems, Adam OR do you simply not bother to read correctly what others post? Please point me to any of my posts which support Nug's suggestion that Scipio posts fake documents.

[Caroline]

April always requests I am banned whenever I post the truth about Nugs.

Although she happy to let him claim documents posted by Scipio are fake or have him call my posts 'bullshit' while I am offline. 

Maybe they were buddies when she was a Jeremy supporter.

Anyway, hopefully Nugs will elaborate on his fake documents claim on this thread. And also answer my question on the David Boutflour thread he created. I cannot see how this thread supports guilt or innocence. In other words what was the point ?

Not buddies and not enemies, just people on a forum Adam.

The point of the thread (I believe) was to suggest that Fielder is a liar, therefore he must have lied about the photographs, therefore Jeremy didn't try to sell them, therefore there is a big conspiracy and everyone is lying except Jeremy. That's the way it usually goes!

 

[Jane]

........................ I cannot see how this thread supports guilt or innocence. In other words what was the point ?

No, you wouldn't see the point because you appear to have little tolerance for any thread which you can't crow about having created. 

[scipio_usmc]

The log you posted was written by Bonnet, it's on the back of the log he wrote from the call received from West.

My point though was Mike initially posted it.  I merely copied the snippet from the document he posted. So if claiming this is a fake then the claim is Mike posted a fake and I merely copied from his fake.  Nugs didn't realize Mike posted it which says much more than I could say....

[Caroline]

My point though was Mike initially posted it.  I merely copied the snippet from the document he posted. So if claiming this is a fake then the claim is Mike posted a fake and I merely copied from his fake.  Nugs didn't realize Mike posted it which says much more than I could say....

Yes, I know - was just clarifying where it came from.