0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
This wasn't the same note with the letters and 3's on it as a couple of weeks ago. That other drivel came from a clairvoyant,something which Colin was into.
Mike misrepresented the letter he referred to in the first post of this thread as being DRH/42 which was found on Sheila's night stand. I posted the actual DRH/42 to show that is not the case.
There were three parts of exhibit DRH/42, one of them was the note I am mentioning, another part was the coded message, and a third part was some undecipherable writings...
No Mike I don't believe that is true . We spent a lot of time deciphering those notes and they were not written by Sheila. Perhaps with all the documents you have seen you have become confused.
It is not confusion, he knows what he is doing and is doing so intentionally.
Crikey this is getting weird
My advice is believe nothing you read, unless you see it backed up by a document...and if someone posts something that sounds outlandish and says it's from a document - check the actual document to see if it is really there.When you're new to the case you can believe things that aren't true and because you have no reason not to believe them you store them away as fact.
We do try not to though :DIt does come with experience
Happens to us all! I still kick myself for believing for the longest time the whole monestary story without actually checking it out for myself.
Yes I agree with that one - although there was a source - the source was never verified therefore it has now become an urban myth.
