Sheila Caffells note, police Exhibit DRH/42?

[lookout]

 Each letter in the alphabet has a number------------simple enough to work out,except that if you're a " white witch " like Sheila had told Helen Grimster that she was,then you'd understand the significance of both letters and numbers.
13 also means Rebellion. Which would also figure if this is what Sheila meant by being a white witch.

[guest154]

13th letter of the alphabet is M.

Jeremy has an M in his name!   

 

[lookout]

 It doesn't work like that.
M--4.



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
A B C D E F G H I
J K L M N O P Q R
S T U V W X Y Z.

[mike tesko]

Oh no! I think I know what's coming next! 

If you add up together the 3's, it produces a total of 15, which equals the exact number 15 of the 25 bullets fired at the time of the killings via use of the anshuzt rifle, including the five double magazine marked rounds..,

I think Sheila intended to kill the other four victims and herself by use of 3 bullets a piece, but events took a turn for the worse, hence the use of the other .22 rifle (and the police ammunition) in the final scenario...

[guest154]

It doesn't work like that.
M--4.



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
A B C D E F G H I
J K L M N O P Q R
S T U V W X Y Z.

The 13th letter of the alphabet is M no matter what you try and force. You're entitled to your own opinion but not your own facts.

[mike tesko]

Also, just as a matter of interest, note the use of the printed word, "PLEASE", toward the bottom of the coded note (first part of DRH/32), since the same handwritten word ( PLEASE) concludes the fresh note I am referring to, albeit it is handwritten in this latest note, whilst printed in the former example...

[lookout]

Utter tripe and desperation!

Like Sheila you mean ? She was the white witch----------she wrote the note.I'm only trying to decipher it.Why not have a go yourself instead of forever mocking my bloody posts !!

[Caroline]

Like Sheila you mean ? She was the white witch----------she wrote the note.I'm only trying to decipher it.Why not have a go yourself instead of forever mocking my bloody posts !!

Because it only means something to the person that wrote it and we don't even know who that was. Anyway, this wasn't the note being discussed at the beginning of the thread???

[lookout]

Because it only means something to the person that wrote it and we don't even know who that was. Anyway, this wasn't the note being discussed at the beginning of the thread???

I note you didn't remark to Scip when he put it up. It's still a note whether you like it or not and is obviously relevant to the case as it was given an exhibit number.

[Jane]

Like Sheila you mean ? She was the white witch----------she wrote the note.I'm only trying to decipher it.Why not have a go yourself instead of forever mocking my bloody posts !!

How on earth can you POSSIBLY know that Sheila wrote the words when you have only been TOLD that Sheila wrote the words by someone who'd been told that Sheila wrote the words. Given that no one involved knew her until after her death, how the hell do they KNOW she wrote the words?

[Caroline]

I note you didn't remark to Scip when he put it up. It's still a note whether you like it or not and is obviously relevant to the case as it was given an exhibit number.

He wasn't talking about the content of the note and as usual, you missed the point he was making 

[Caroline]

How on earth can you POSSIBLY know that Sheila wrote the words when you have only been TOLD that Sheila wrote the words by someone who'd been told that Sheila wrote the words. Given that no one involved knew her until after her death, how the hell do they KNOW she wrote the words?

I'm wondering also how DRH/42 can represent the note initially described by Mike and also the one posted by Scip  . The label only states 'handwritten note' but can't represent both notes!

[lookout]

He wasn't talking about the content of the note and as usual, you missed the point he was making 

I didn't read his post I was eating my dinner.Still haven't read it,just saw the letters and tried to fathom them out,though I'm sorry I bothered as I only get ridiculed anyway.

[notsure]

Hello,

Yes, a lot of bad feeling, and I have been as guilty as some of them when it comes to dishing it out. But I have vowed to try and steer clear of the trouble makers by ignoring them until they learn to debate respectfully...

The information I provide is contained in my version of the case file, which consists of around 50,000 documents. I came into possessession of these after the failed 2002 appeal, when good friends of Jeremy's who had been holding them in storage in their garage, needed the room and were going to destroy them if no-one could be found to take possession of them. To cut a long story short, I volunteered to have them providing that they belonged to me, and I had to promise to make copies of any document requested by Jeremy which he might need for any new CCRC application. By and large we kept to this arrangement until the beginning of 2004, when I removed one of the photographs showing Sheila's body on the bed from a confidential police photographic album loaned to Ewen Smith who's solicitors office was based in Birmingham. The thing about this photograph is that it showed Sheila laid Flatt on her back on top of the bed with her head resting on the left hand pillow. The photographer who took this particular photograph must have been standing on the bedroom floor in the region of the bottom of the bed. The hem if her nightdress is ridden up to the top of her thighs in this photograph, she is not wearing panties, and when I first saw it in the photographic album, I was shocked to see that the police had taken such a photograph whereby her groin region was fully exposed for all to see. When I look at this photograph it reminds me of a soft porn picture. I never expected to see anything at all like that in the withheld police album. I can also tell you that in this photograph there is no blood in a triangular shape which appears later in the photographs taken of Sheila on the bedroom floor next to the bed. Additionally there is no blood running from the corners of her mouth, no blood which has looked in her left eye socket, and no diagonal blood running across her neck from any second bullet wound by that stage. There is no rifle at all on her body, there is no bible, there is no bloodied fingermarks on the front lower part of her nightdress. There is no evidence of aspirated blood in the chest region of her nightdress. There is no bloodied fingermarks on her throat at all. She is laid there, hem of nightdress risen, back of her head resting on the left hand pillow. Anyone seeing this photograph for the first time would think she must have been dead at this time, simply because of the nature of the photograph, since if the photographer had known she was not dead, what was he doing taking lewd photographs of a wounded suspect? I have since learned, confirmed by Jeremy himself that police at the scene took a series of these photographs using the bodies of victims as props in a side show. I believe police took a total of 78 such photographs with the intention of keeping copies for themselves like some sort of a trophy. Anyway, we don't yet know who took those 78 lewd photographs at the scene, the police have for 30 years kept a lid in the whole sordid affair. What they did was disrespectful and perverted. Yet none of these police perverts have ever been disciplined, or prosecuted. Now, when I first saw this photograph of Sheila in the bed, I realised straight away that there was something wring with her body being in top of the bed in that pose, minus the rifle, and only a small vertical run of blood down from a solitary wound in her throat, whereas, in later photographs taken when Sheila's body ends up on the bedroom floor by the edge of the bed, there is then an additional shot on her throat, with blood running horizontally across her neck, blood running from the corners of her mouth, blood has run out if her left nostril and run backwards and pooled into her left eye socket. There is now a rifle a top her body and someone has now arranged both her hands upon and around the gun as though she must have shot herself. There is now a bloodied fingermark around the source if a second wound under her chin, and evidence of freshly made aspirated blood on the upper front region of her nightdress, along with bloodied fingermarks in the front lower right hand side of her nightdress, all features which were not present in the earlier photograph they took of Sheila in the bed...

Jeremy Vamber did not shoot and kill his sister, and he had no involvement in stage managing her body on the bedroom floor to make it look like his sister had taken her own life - police themselves were responsible for doing all those things...

[Caroline]

I didn't read his post I was eating my dinner.Still haven't read it,just saw the letters and tried to fathom them out,though I'm sorry I bothered as I only get ridiculed anyway.

Perhaps because when others had a go, you claimed (as though you knew) 'It doesn't work like that'. You're just guessing which is obviously all anyone can do with that note because no one here (or anywhere) knows what it means - if anything at all.