what happend to brett colins

[Adam]

Jeremy -

Grew and sold drugs.

Stole watches when abroad.

Boasted about smuggling heroin across to another country.

Robbed the caravan site.

Massacred five people.

Smuggled drugs from Amsterdam to England.

[Adam]

https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&ei=N_tlVcqZMcWwUbKMgeAD&url=http://content.wow.com/wiki/Jeremy_Bamber&ved=0CCsQFjAGOBQ&usg=AFQjCNGxICfpAFlZvE9Vl4Ub8NdglTOvrA&sig2=PqyAp4r3I4or6F4BAGchhA

[Jan]

You blame everyone else for Jeremy's bad actions except Jeremy.  Quite clearly he was the one who decided to rob the caravan site and not as you claim because Julie put him up to it- he dragged her there.  But you would rather believe she corrupted him because you don't want to face he was bad. Brett didn't put up Jeremy to kill his family Jeremy decided to do so on his own. You close your eyes to the truth instead preferring to believe you know what Jeremy is really like based on things no more reliable than consulting some gypsy who claims to have a crystal ball.  You use this totally unreliable fiction to discount solid evidence that proves his guilt in the meantime. It just shows some people willingly hide from reality rather than facing it.

 

I am surprised you even bought that up . You have Julies version against Jeremys and so what if he did do it - it does not make him a murderer. If you are going to use that argument Julies past shows clearly she was a liar - and yet it was her evidence that was a main contribution to him being jailed. So fact- the principle witness was a liar and had committed fraud and was connected with drugs offences .

[/color]

[Jan]

I fail to see anything stimulating about being a member of anything where people agree all the time. OK. You seem to think there would be nothing wrong with Jeremy trying to flog porny pics of his dead sister (because he didn't actually receive any money?) and yet you seem to throw up your hands in horror at the mere thought of Sheila allowing such to be taken. Don't blame me if you come up with thoughts which I consider to be discussion worthy.

Where did lookout say that ? I don't think she accepts that they were pornographic - and she does not believe the Sun would not have published them if they existed?

Or did I misunderstand your posts Lookout?

And even Colin was shocked at the ones taken in her garden so I think Lookout is allowed to "throw her hands up in horror"  if that is how you see it.


Question 1 - did Colin or anyone else  then or since actually see the pictures that the Sun so graphically described and attributed the description to Jeremy?

[Jan]

back to thread

I would be interested to see any press articles about Brett after the trial.

[Adam]

How is Julie a liar ?

She lied early on in her WS. She was in a daze after Jeremy rudely woke her. Twice. Then summoned her over.

But she came good.

She didn't mention the 1984 cheque book fraud. There were more important issues. But she did mention the caravan break in.

[Jan]

How is Julie a liar ?

She lied early on in her WS. She was in a daze after Jeremy rudely woke her. Twice. Then summoned her over.

But she came good.

She didn't mention the 1984 cheque book fraud. There were more important issues. But she did mention the caravan break in.

She committed fraud - that makes her a liar 

she was according to the official document involved in drug smuggling - you have to be a liar to do that
She lied in her first statement -

The bank said she lied about a policeman going in to the bank with her


Lies .

So check your facts before you post - idiot .

Go and support yourself you need it.

[Adam]

back to thread

I would be interested to see any press articles about Brett after the trial.

Go find them then.

Brett left the sinking ship. As far as I know quite early on.

There is no mention of him since the jolly up in St Tropez.

[Caroline]

Where did lookout say that ? I don't think she accepts that they were pornographic - and she does not believe the Sun would not have published them if they existed?

Or did I misunderstand your posts Lookout?

And even Colin was shocked at the ones taken in her garden so I think Lookout is allowed to "throw her hands up in horror"  if that is how you see it.


Question 1 - did Colin or anyone else  then or since actually see the pictures that the Sun so graphically described and attributed the description to Jeremy?

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,6696.msg308034.html#msg308034

[scipio_usmc]

I am surprised you even bought that up . You have Julies version against Jeremys and so what if he did do it - it does not make him a murderer. If you are going to use that argument Julies past shows clearly she was a liar - and yet it was her evidence that was a main contribution to him being jailed. So fact- the principle witness was a liar and had committed fraud and was connected with drugs offences .

Surprised I brought up lookouts ridiculous suggestion that Julie corrupted him?  The only lies Julie told were to help out Jeremy.  She didn't lie about the checks she admitted to it like she admitted to being with him when he burglarized the caravan site and admitted to using drugs.

You have not come up with anything to dent her testimony against Jeremy and a great deal of evidence in the case corroborates his guilt. Like lookout you have some ridiculous bias in favor of Jeremy and not the truth.

[Jan]

Surprised I brought up lookouts ridiculous suggestion that Julie corrupted him?  The only lies Julie told were to help out Jeremy.  She didn't lie about the checks she admitted to it like she admitted to being with him when he burglarized the caravan site and admitted to using drugs.

You have not come up with anything to dent her testimony against Jeremy and a great deal of evidence in the case corroborates his guilt. Like lookout you have some ridiculous bias in favor of Jeremy and not the truth.

That's your opinion - I know that because its all you ever say - you are like groundhog day . And I could not care one jot about you or what you think when you post like that.

[Caroline]

I am surprised you even bought that up . You have Julies version against Jeremys and so what if he did do it - it does not make him a murderer. If you are going to use that argument Julies past shows clearly she was a liar - and yet it was her evidence that was a main contribution to him being jailed. So fact- the principle witness was a liar and had committed fraud and was connected with drugs offences .

No, but it does make him an absolute vile human being, the kind of human being who has no conscience, the kind who's greed knows no bounds, the kind that could kill his family and not bat and eyelid. In short - a complete psychopath.

[nugnug]

well you seem to be cliaming he corupted the both burgeled the caravan site in law they were both equally guilty.

theres no way of saying for a fact that one corupted the other.

[Caroline]

well you seem to be cliaming he corupted the both burgeled the caravan site in law they were both equally guilty.

theres no way of saying for a fact that one corupted the other.

I'd say they were equally guilty of the caravan burglary; but Jeremy killed his family and then tried to sell explicit pictures of his dead sister - a sister that he murdered. He took her children, her parents, her life, her reputation and finally, he tried to steal her dignity! Wadda guy!!

[scipio_usmc]

well you seem to be cliaming he corupted the both burgeled the caravan site in law they were both equally guilty.

theres no way of saying for a fact that one corupted the other.

He's the one who took her there and the one who stole the money. He took her because he thought she would be skinny enough to be able to reach inside to grab the key. He asked her to get the key but she could not reach it so then he broke in instead and stole the money.  She was guilty of a failed attempt to help him enter.  Because she was unsuccessful in her attempt he broke in and actually stole the money.  In what way do you see their guilt equally?  They are not equals in the eyes of the law.

In the meantime she had no need to tell police about her attempt to get the key she could have have said he brought her there and as she sat he broke in and stole the money and because his family owned it she didn't realize anything was wrong till later.  She didn't lie and say such she admitted her unsuccessful attempt to help him.