The meeting with The Sun newspaper:

[nugnug]

He hasn't denied it either - he likes to tell the truth where possible 

not denying somthing isnt the same as confirming it.

[susan]

It's not like every reporter films/records every time they meet with someone, crazy! But even if they had there would still be an excuse as to why you can't trust! 

Colin said as soon as he read the article he knew by the wording Jeremy had told them about the photo's and that is where the story had come from. 

[Adam]

jeremy hasnt confirmed anything as far as i know.

The OS confirmed the meeting happened. A previous thread showed Jeremy is involved with this.

The OS is saying it was a big sting set up by The Sun. My recent thread shows this laughable.

[Jane]

Yep, someone could be doing an impression of Jeremy? 

DUCK EVERYONE, we're under attack from flying elephants :D :D :D

[Adam]

I have told Nugs he has to change and say 'just because Jeremy did this, it does not make him the killer'.

However he is just saying he does not believe it happened. Although the OS said it did happen. 

It seems Lookout accepts it happened. She has not said much, apart from an attempt to change the subject.

[Caroline]

DUCK EVERYONE, we're under attack from flying elephants :D :D :D

Well, one stopped flying and has been present through out the thread - the elephant is the fact that it's OBVIOUS he tried to sell the pictures but instead of acknowledging it's presence, people are trying to walk around it. 'The Elephant' is getting fatter though, eventually, there will be no space to move for the elephant in the room! 

[Jane]

In how many ways can nude photos be described? Not that many, right? But in each and every person´s mind, it can be interpreted differently.
I can´t see this as proof.
What did Jeremy mean by "famous pictures"? That term can easily be misunderstood. Famous pictures, couldn´t they just have been fashion pictures which had been in magazines?
Besides, I think that Gringo has an excellent point: why wasn´t the meeting recorded, wouldn´t that have been the norm?

It's possible that the meeting WAS recorded.......................as security against a time when Jeremy may have denied it took place/disputed something said. He never has so producing the recording wasn't necessary.

[susan]

Yes, they can be described in different way but if you add the words dildo and cucumber - it narrows the field. I don't think gringo has ANY point - why didn't they film it for that matter? Why didn't they invite the whole reporting team to witness the event? Simple answer is that 'they didn't' but just because they didn't do something, doesn't alter the FACT that Colin said Jeremy described the pictures to him, in the SAME way as had been reported in The Sun.

Caroline the famous photo's Jeremy removed from Sheila's flat if they were just nude photo's like the ones he left in the cupboard why did he take them it was not because he cared because he could have taken the album with photo's of Sheila and her boys. Colin said that Jeremy's behaviour was distasteful the way he was gloating over the explicit photo's. But we don;t know if the reporter recorded the conversation why was Jeremy not screaming his head off when he saw the article on the front page of the Sun.

[Caroline]

I have told Nugs he has to change and say 'just because Jeremy did this, it does not make him the killer'.

However he is just saying he does not believe it happened. Although the OS said it did happen. 

It seems Lookout accepts it happened. She has not said much, apart from an attempt to change the subject.

No it doesn't make him a killer but by accepting that he did this, I guess you have to accept that if he could do that (without conscience), what else is he capable of?

[Adam]

No it doesn't make him a killer but by accepting that he did this, I guess you have to accept that if he could do that (without conscience), what else is he capable of?

That is why Nugs won't accept it.

[Caroline]

Caroline the famous photo's Jeremy removed from Sheila's flat if they were just nude photo's like the ones he left in the cupboard why did he take them it was not because he cared because he could have taken the album with photo's of Sheila and her boys. Colin said that Jeremy's behaviour was distasteful the way he was gloating over the explicit photo's. But we don;t know if the reporter recorded the conversation why was Jeremy not screaming his head off when he saw the article on the front page of the Sun.

Exactly! 

[nugnug]

The OS confirmed the meeting happened. A previous thread showed Jeremy is involved with this.

The OS is saying it was a big sting set up by The Sun. My recent thread shows this laughable.

i cant find that on the offical sight could you post a link please adam.

[guest154]

No it doesn't make him a killer but by accepting that he did this, I guess you have to accept that if he could do that (without conscience), what else is he capable of?

Perfect point.

[Jane]

Exactly! 

Odd, don't you think, that he was all fired up to sue the psychologist who said he was a psychopath -according to him, she lied- yet when we think what the sale of porny pics would have said about his sister,  he didn't turn a hair to deny that he's done it OR make any attempt to try to salvage her reputation when the story broke.

[Adam]

http://jeremybamber.org/jeremy-bamber/


For Nugs. Fifth paragraph from the bottom.