The meeting with The Sun newspaper:

[Caroline]

 They weren't on the Stokenchurch list,so where were they ?

I'm sure they went up in smoke fairly quickly after the article appeared in The Sun.

[lookout]

 Being in possession of porno pics would have been illegal back then,and I can't understand why he wasn't charged with such,along with the other charges,etc at trial.
Anything " explicit " I'd have classed as pornographic.

[nugnug]

not necasarly it would depend what was in them the law was very vague on the matter and still is.

[Caroline]

Being in possession of porno pics would have been illegal back then,and I can't understand why he wasn't charged with such,along with the other charges,etc at trial.
Anything " explicit " I'd have classed as pornographic.

No it wasn't, think you need to check your fact Lookout. Pornography was on the top shelf then but it CERTAINLY wasn't illegal. I'm not sure where you're getting your info from but you should shoot the messenger 

[lookout]

I'm sure they went up in smoke fairly quickly after the article appeared in The Sun.

If they ever existed at all.Apart from the usual mucky page three articles,I can't see anything being much different. Up in flames with the rest of the evidence.
About as disrespectful as JM posing after the trial. The things some folk will do for money!!

[Caroline]

not necasarly it would depend what was in them the law was very vague on the matter and still is.

I posted the transcript from the video Nugs and there was nothing in what he said that was remotely illegal. I'll post it again. I have highlighted what Jeremy told the reporter about what the pictures depicted.

"We got a call from Jeremy Bamber's friend, Brett Collins; saying that Jeremy Bamber had some photographs to sell of his late sister and would 'we' The Sun newspaper, be interested in buying them. It was a bizarre situation. We were in an oldy worldy pub and we were talking about the photo's, what were they and what did they show? There was apparently shots with a vibrator and with a cucumber being used as a sex toy. Erm and would The Sun be interested in buying them? He said “well we want cash and would like to conclude this every quickly.” I never did see the photographs, whether they did exist or not, I don't know, I reported back to the office what the situation was and got a message back from the editor saying “Turn the bastard over” We ran the story the next day saying “Jeremy Bamber Tries to Sell Pornographic Pictures of his Sister.”

I was applauded, you know, you've got this very cool young man, completely unperturbed by the facts of the situation. The massacre, these dead people that had given him a home and he seemed completely unconcerned about them. He talked about Bambi particularly as an inanimate object, you know, it wasn't a sister that he had known and loved. He seemed completely unconcerned about these people. He wanted money and he wanted it quick."

[Caroline]

If they ever existed at all.Apart from the usual mucky page three articles,I can't see anything being much different. Up in flames with the rest of the evidence.
About as disrespectful as JM posing after the trial. The things some folk will do for money!!

Not many 'innocent' people would try and sell explicit pictures of their dead sister  only days after her death. You're right - 'the things people will do for money'.

[nugnug]

I posted the transcript from the video Nugs and there was nothing in what he said that was remotely illegal. I'll post it again. I have highlighted what Jeremy told the reporter about what the pictures depicted.

"We got a call from Jeremy Bamber's friend, Brett Collins; saying that Jeremy Bamber had some photographs to sell of his late sister and would 'we' The Sun newspaper, be interested in buying them. It was a bizarre situation. We were in an oldy worldy pub and we were talking about the photo's, what were they and what did they show? There was apparently shots with a vibrator and with a cucumber being used as a sex toy. Erm and would The Sun be interested in buying them? He said “well we want cash and would like to conclude this every quickly.” I never did see the photographs, whether they did exist or not, I don't know, I reported back to the office what the situation was and got a message back from the editor saying “Turn the bastard over” We ran the story the next day saying “Jeremy Bamber Tries to Sell Pornographic Pictures of his Sister.”

I was applauded, you know, you've got this very cool young man, completely unperturbed by the facts of the situation. The massacre, these dead people that had given him a home and he seemed completely unconcerned about them. He talked about Bambi particularly as an inanimate object, you know, it wasn't a sister that he had known and loved. He seemed completely unconcerned about these people. He wanted money and he wanted it quick."

who is suposed to have taken these photos.

[Jane]

who is suposed to have taken these photos.

Nugs, the "who" is hardly relevant. It's more common than may be thought for husbands to want "private," or even to see NOT so private, pictures of wives displayed in "boys" mags. Colin, as an artist, probably took some beautiful private pictures.

 Sheila wasn't in high end modelling so undoubtedly would have come across photographers who were more than willing to encourage her to pose for them showing what nature -and the surgeon's knife- had endowed her with. Given that she'd had breast augmentation -which wouldn't have been necessary for serious modelling where less is definitely more- it's very possible that she'd had it done with glamour modelling in mind. The photographer responsible for taking raunchy shots, if he hadn't known her, was unlikely to have been interested in her name or face, ONLY in getting paid. If he HAD known her, I can list NUMEROUS reasons why he wouldn't have wanted to admit to having taken them.

I don't know if you're simply interested to know who took the pictures OR suggesting that they'd done something illegal, in which case I would say that the responsibility was entirely Sheila's as the pictures couldn't have been taken without her cooperation and consent.

[nugnug]

colin said he hadent even seen the pictures how could he of taken them.

[susan]

colin said he hadent even seen the pictures how could he of taken them.

Hello nugnug

Colin had not seen the explicit pictures that Jeremy had he saw the ones he took at WHF early into their relationship they were nude but not explicit.

[nugnug]

Nugs, the "who" is hardly relevant. It's more common than may be thought for husbands to want "private," or even to see NOT so private, pictures of wives displayed in "boys" mags. Colin, as an artist, probably took some beautiful private pictures.

 Sheila wasn't in high end modelling so undoubtedly would have come across photographers who were more than willing to encourage her to pose for them showing what nature -and the surgeon's knife- had endowed her with. Given that she'd had breast augmentation -which wouldn't have been necessary for serious modelling where less is definitely more- it's very possible that she'd had it done with glamour modelling in mind. The photographer responsible for taking raunchy shots, if he hadn't known her, was unlikely to have been interested in her name or face, ONLY in getting paid. If he HAD known her, I can list NUMEROUS reasons why he wouldn't have wanted to admit to having taken them.

I don't know if you're simply interested to know who took the pictures OR suggesting that they'd done something illegal, in which case I would say that the responsibility was entirely Sheila's as the pictures couldn't have been taken without her cooperation and consent.

i

i am saying i dont belive the hardcore ones exist.

nobodys seen them.

[Jane]

colin said he hadent even seen the pictures how could he of taken them.

There appears to have been TWO sets of pictures, Nugs. Is it really that surprising that Colin HADN'T seen pictures that may have been far more sexually explicit than those he had taken? It's possible, that having seen them for herself, in the cold light of day, Sheila wasn't terribly proud of them.

[Adam]

So Jeremy may have got hold of both sets of pictures. When rummaging around Sheila's flat, post the expensive Amsterdam/Burnham/funeral jolly ups.

[susan]

So Jeremy may have got hold of both sets of pictures. When rummaging around Sheila's flat, post the expensive Amsterdam/Burnham/funeral jolly ups.

Adam both sets of pictures were at Sheila's flat and Jeremy found them but was only interested in the explicit ones. Colin stated in his book he was in shock that Sheila would be into that type of picture and he said she must have been desperate to do them.