The meeting with The Sun newspaper:

[nugnug]

What documents?

well like a contract or somthing he derw up with them or sighned records of the meeting if a meeting happend im sure the said jornlist would of made an expences cliam.

[susan]

well like a contract or somthing he derw up with them or sighned records of the meeting if a meeting happend im sure the said jornlist would of made an expences cliam.

nugnug sorry I thought by documents you meant the photo's I see now you mean a legal contract or the like in exchange for the photo's.

[lookout]

It seems strange to me that nothing came out of " that meeting ?"

[Adam]

It seems strange to me that nothing came out of " that meeting ?"

Something did come out of it.

The Sun had a front page story and did not need to pay Jeremy 25k for it.

[lookout]

 I don't think so. Besides,Jeremy doesn't do blood money !

[nugnug]

this story is certanly provable of disprovable ethere way.

[Caroline]

I don't think so. Besides,Jeremy doesn't do blood money !

He didn't get the chance.

[Caroline]

well like a contract or somthing he derw up with them or sighned records of the meeting if a meeting happend im sure the said jornlist would of made an expences cliam.

What contract? They didn't have a contract with Bamber, the proof is that they wrote the story about it and Bamber didn't deny it, he also told Colin he had explicit pics of Sheila - what more do you want?

[Caroline]

The " offence " of " trying to sell explicit pics of a deceased woman ".

That's not an offence Lookout, they were his pictures.

[Caroline]

Legal documents-------------listed as " extortion" in trying to obtain monies by unsavoury means. You should know how everyone sensationalized everything at the time. Dishing the dirt and scraping the barrel springs to mind.

This is what he was supposed to have been trying to do,wasn't it ??  Something that was allegedly full of shock and awe surely would have been listed as a crime/offence at the time ?  The fact that he was accompanied by his " poofy " friend was enough to have made headline news ?

Perhaps the Sun can cast their minds back,I won't hold my breath.

Of course it's not a crime! It's morally wrong not legally. The article was written about him trying to sell porno pics of his dead sister - it most definitely DID appear in The Sun, but there was no legal case or charges because of it. Interestingly, there were no denials by Bamber either 

[lebaleb]

If it's in the Sun it must be true!

[Caroline]

If it's in the Sun it must be true!

JUst because it's in The Sun doesn't mean it's not true and enough information had been supplied to show that this particular accusation is legit.

[lookout]

That's not an offence Lookout, they were his pictures.

 They weren't on the Stokenchurch list,so where were they ?

[scipio_usmc]

JUst because it's in The Sun doesn't mean it's not true and enough information had been supplied to show that this particular accusation is legit.

It's kind of funny when you think about it.  He went to the Sun so they could publish dirty photos and instead they got an even better story- scumbag brother tries to sell us dirty photos of his sister.  They did better paying nothing to him than becoming complicit by paying him.


 

[Caroline]

It's kind of funny when you think about it.  He went to the Sun so they could publish dirty photos and instead they got an even better story- scumbag brother tries to sell us dirty photos of his sister.  They did better paying nothing to him than becoming complicit by paying him.

Exactly, there's nothing new in an ex model having a few risky pics taken, but the story about Jeremy trying to sell explicit pics of his dead sister must have been like gold dust to them.