0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,3698.0.htmlThis Thread makes interesting reading imo.
He declined to answer. Oh dear. There is no reason for Fielding to lie in a documentary 20 years later.
Well if there was a drugs gang involved,Jeremy's better staying where he is,or he'll be dead meat.
How do you know?
There wasn't
Why do you think Fielding would go on TV 20 years later and say he met Collins & Bamber, if he didn't ?
Why do you think Jeremy declined to answer when asked ?
Supporters have to accept this happened. But can say it doesn't make him guilty. Very strange behaviour though for a grieving son/brother/uncle.
Are there any other instances where someone connected to an appalling crime have tried to cash in straight away ? Do people agree this sealed his fate ? As the narrator of the new video said. It is true this put him in a worse light, but there is no mention of it being brought up at trial, so did not effect the juries decision.
Are there people who committed murders for money who spent the money right away instead of waiting? Yes plenty it would probably be a shorter list of those who didn't spend right away.Did what seal his fate? Are you asking if being greedy thus committing the murders sealed his fate or spending lavishly after the murders did so? Quite obviously it was the former that sealed his fate. The lavish spending after isn't what convicted him.
His behaviour as a hole one could argue got the ball rolling against him. Had he put on a much better act and kept it full time for at least a month then maybe things could have been different