« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8]   Go Down

Author Topic: If confronted with a similar amount of incriminating evidence -  (Read 10131 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

guest154

  • Guest
Re: If confronted with a similar amount of incriminating evidence -
« Reply #105 on: October 03, 2015, 07:22:PM »
Quote from: petey on October 03, 2015, 07:12:PM
You need to understand the difference between 'working for' and prioritising.

Even if jb had x amount of people in his legal team this doesn't mean that he is the number one priority for any of these who will have different priorities.

Surely u don't think Simon McKay et al work 24:7 for jb?! People spend far more time on this forum debating jb than his legal team spend 'working' for him.

Anyone working full time for Bamber must have
1. A lot of time on their hands.
2. Nothing better to do, because surely there are easier ways to earn a crust.
3.  A blind spot in their mind if they are willing to work full time at a case where other capable people have strongly failed to win an appeal.
Logged

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: If confronted with a similar amount of incriminating evidence -
« Reply #106 on: October 03, 2015, 07:29:PM »
Quote from: mat on October 03, 2015, 07:22:PM
Anyone working full time for Bamber must have
1. A lot of time on their hands.
2. Nothing better to do, because surely there are easier ways to earn a crust.
3.  A blind spot in their mind if they are willing to work full time at a case where other capable people have strongly failed to win an appeal.






The QC and Barrister could be retired !
Logged

guest154

  • Guest
Re: If confronted with a similar amount of incriminating evidence -
« Reply #107 on: October 03, 2015, 07:31:PM »
Quote from: lookout on October 03, 2015, 07:29:PM





The QC and Barrister could be retired !

They must be slight masochists  ;D
Logged

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: If confronted with a similar amount of incriminating evidence -
« Reply #108 on: October 03, 2015, 07:35:PM »
Quote from: mat on October 03, 2015, 07:31:PM
They must be slight masochists  ;D







Not necessarily.They obviously think the case is worth pursuing.
Logged

guest154

  • Guest
Re: If confronted with a similar amount of incriminating evidence -
« Reply #109 on: October 03, 2015, 07:39:PM »
Quote from: lookout on October 03, 2015, 07:35:PM






Not necessarily.They obviously think the case is worth pursuing.

That's if they even all exist. Bamber has made claims in the past that haven't been true so I don't fully believe he has as many people working for him as those who support him claim.
Logged

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: If confronted with a similar amount of incriminating evidence -
« Reply #110 on: October 03, 2015, 07:42:PM »
Quote from: mat on October 03, 2015, 07:39:PM
That's if they even all exist. Bamber has made claims in the past that haven't been true so I don't fully believe he has as many people working for him as those who support him claim.






Suit yourself I'm not particularly interested in what you've got to say anyway. Total negativity.
Logged

Offline notsure

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1684
Re: If confronted with a similar amount of incriminating evidence -
« Reply #111 on: October 03, 2015, 07:55:PM »
Just read this thread. Think Adam has a problem.? Why do you say over and over again that there are 30 pieces of evidence against jb.Adam we are not children.. we are capable of reading your posts and fully understanding them first time round.

to be honest it makes you sound a bit nutty so i would suggest you try and think of something different to say as it is driving me crazy!
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8]   Go Up
« previous next »