« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8   Go Down

Author Topic: If confronted with a similar amount of incriminating evidence -  (Read 10142 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44293
Re: If confronted with a similar amount of incriminating evidence -
« Reply #90 on: August 24, 2015, 08:52:PM »
Quote from: Jan on August 24, 2015, 08:49:PM
trust me I have missed nothing .

I have only decided to read your posts because you have dropped from the most rude and annoying posters to second place . I am still very annoyed with you because of you accusations and lack of apology .

If you have missed nothing, why did you say my points are just do with Sheila ?

Logged
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: If confronted with a similar amount of incriminating evidence -
« Reply #91 on: August 24, 2015, 08:54:PM »
because there is no direct evidence to link Jeremy to carrying out the crime.
Logged

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44293
Re: If confronted with a similar amount of incriminating evidence -
« Reply #92 on: August 24, 2015, 09:01:PM »
Quote from: Jan on August 24, 2015, 08:54:PM
because there is no direct evidence to link Jeremy to carrying out the crime.

You and Lookout will never say there is.

There are over 30 forensic points which link Bamber to the crime. Which I have posted.

You and Lookout will dig in and say there is none. If there is just one, he is guilty.

Keep fire fighting. Jeremy needs his Xxxxx'x.

« Last Edit: August 24, 2015, 09:17:PM by maggie »
Logged
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: If confronted with a similar amount of incriminating evidence -
« Reply #93 on: August 24, 2015, 09:04:PM »
Quote from: Adam on August 24, 2015, 09:01:PM
You and Lookout will never say there is.

There are over 30 forensic points which link Bamber to the crime. Which I have posted.

You and Lookout will dig in and say there is none. If there is just one, he is guilty.

Keep fire fighting. Jeremy needs his Xxxxx'x


that proves you are an idiot . I am not Poppy .

that is an accusation from a desperate person.

If you are so sure of his guilt you should be confident and not hitting out when you are proven wrong.
« Last Edit: August 24, 2015, 09:18:PM by maggie »
Logged

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44293
Re: If confronted with a similar amount of incriminating evidence -
« Reply #94 on: August 24, 2015, 09:16:PM »
Quote from: Jan on August 24, 2015, 09:04:PM

that proves you are an idiot . I am not Poppy .

that is an accusation from a desperate person.

If you are so sure of his guilt you should be confident and not hitting out when you are proven wrong.

I must admit Lookouts statement in the Sheila's leg being pulled thread did give me some doubts.

She said 'it was my leg being pulled'.
Logged
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: If confronted with a similar amount of incriminating evidence -
« Reply #95 on: August 24, 2015, 09:53:PM »
Quote from: Adam on August 24, 2015, 09:16:PM
I must admit Lookouts statement in the Sheila's leg being pulled thread did give me some doubts.

She said 'it was my leg being pulled'.

perhaps we should research when that theory first came into the scheme of things ?

Do you think Jeremy did not realise that dead bodies cant move?
Logged

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: If confronted with a similar amount of incriminating evidence -
« Reply #96 on: October 02, 2015, 10:43:PM »
Quote from: Adam on August 24, 2015, 09:01:PM
You and Lookout will never say there is.

There are over 30 forensic points which link Bamber to the crime. Which I have posted.

You and Lookout will dig in and say there is none. If there is just one, he is guilty.

Keep fire fighting. Jeremy needs his Xxxxx'x.
...
Logged
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: If confronted with a similar amount of incriminating evidence -
« Reply #97 on: October 02, 2015, 11:07:PM »
Logged
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: If confronted with a similar amount of incriminating evidence -
« Reply #98 on: October 02, 2015, 11:23:PM »
Quote from: Caroline on October 02, 2015, 11:07:PM
Been watchin Batman Mike?

Hahaha, Yeah...
Logged
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33771
Re: If confronted with a similar amount of incriminating evidence -
« Reply #99 on: October 03, 2015, 09:54:AM »
Quote from: Caroline on October 02, 2015, 11:07:PM
Been watchin Batman Mike?
 
Quote from: mike tesko on October 02, 2015, 11:23:PM
Hahaha, Yeah...


Heheheheeeeee. Now we ALL can treat Jeremy being proved innocent as a joke, can't we? ;D ;D ;D
Logged

guest154

  • Guest
Re: If confronted with a similar amount of incriminating evidence -
« Reply #100 on: October 03, 2015, 06:55:PM »
Quote from: Jane J on October 03, 2015, 09:54:AM

Heheheheeeeee. Now we ALL can treat Jeremy being proved innocent as a joke, can't we? ;D ;D ;D

 ;D
Logged

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: If confronted with a similar amount of incriminating evidence -
« Reply #101 on: October 03, 2015, 06:58:PM »
Except that it's no joke about the amount of legal people working for him right now. ;D ;D ;D ;D
Logged

guest154

  • Guest
Re: If confronted with a similar amount of incriminating evidence -
« Reply #102 on: October 03, 2015, 07:09:PM »
Quote from: lookout on October 03, 2015, 06:58:PM
Except that it's no joke about the amount of legal people working for him right now. ;D ;D ;D ;D

Oh yeah, those mysterious legal people.  Thankfully innocence isn't judged upon the amount of legal representation a person has, if it was then best let every one convicted of a crime out of prison - because they all have laywers/barristers/solicitors.

Are you saying that this new set of laywers/barristers/solicitors better than his last set?
Logged

Offline petey

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1309
Re: If confronted with a similar amount of incriminating evidence -
« Reply #103 on: October 03, 2015, 07:12:PM »
Quote from: lookout on October 03, 2015, 06:58:PM
Except that it's no joke about the amount of legal people working for him right now. ;D ;D ;D ;D

You need to understand the difference between 'working for' and prioritising.

Even if jb had x amount of people in his legal team this doesn't mean that he is the number one priority for any of these who will have different priorities.

Surely u don't think Simon McKay et al work 24:7 for jb?! People spend far more time on this forum debating jb than his legal team spend 'working' for him.
Logged

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: If confronted with a similar amount of incriminating evidence -
« Reply #104 on: October 03, 2015, 07:18:PM »
Oh Christ-------------here we go !!
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8   Go Up
« previous next »