Hello Scipio thanks for that I was always under the impression that Julie's evidence alone was not enough to convict him but on reflection I guess at the end of the day it was all down to who the Jury believed Julie or Jeremy and I guess they believed her. One would have thought the Defence would have tried to discredit her in someway i.e. cheque fraud drugs but maybe they are not allowed to do this in Court.
The defence did bring up the cheque book fraud to try to discredit her.
As Simon Mckay said, there was more than just Julie's word. A lot of what she said is supported by other people.
