I would ask everybody who is remotely interested in what happened to my nephew, when looking at this CCTV footage, to view it twice, once with the sound audible, and secondly, with the sound turned down, or off. The reason why we as a family would seek to request everyone to adopt this practice, is because with the sound audible it comes across very clearly in our view that my nephew was not being aggressive, or threatening during the events recorded on film. He was only wanting to be told, or given the name and rank number of the police officer who had marked his hand whilst forcibly taking the phone from him. Nobody deserved to be assaulted in the fashion that my nephew was attacked simply because he was trying to identify the person who had assaulted him. There was no need for the police officer in question (FLINT) to have done what he did in the way that he went about doing it, he could simply have unplugged the phone lead without any need to have any physical contact with my nephews arm or hand at all. Why should anyone be at risk of a beating and sustaining a life threatening injury to his heart through being deliberately and violently kneed in the ribs at a time when my nephew was already handcuffed upon the floor face down. We are not very happy with the police, we are not very happy with the assistant coroner Miss Cranny, or the pathologist who have all claimed to have seen this CCTV footage and all come to the conclusion that it was my nephew who was the agressor, refusing to leave and threatening the staff, but this version of events is totally untrue. I can only assume that when they viewed the CCTV footage that the sound was turned down low, or turned off altogether, because with no accompanying sound the body language of my nephew could easily be confused for aggressive and threatening behaviour....