How would you react ?

[Alias]

Nevill, in the alleged call, couldn't have made it MORE clear how serious he believed the situation to be. Even Jeremy admitted that he'd sounded panicked.

Sometimes things take time to sink in, and it differs from person to person.

[Adam]

Adam - Julie definitely lied in either her original statement or in court . There is proof of that.

Barbara Wilson also changed her statements .

The family said there were many family arguments - June Bouttell said the family got on really well and she had never witnessed an argument.

If you examine the evidence of how the silencer was found , where it was stored , and who reported it and handed it to the police - there are discrepancies.

And I think there is no point in anticipating the next submission - we will just have to wait and see.

Who lied in court ? Proof please.

[Jan]

Nevill, in the alleged call, couldn't have made it MORE clear how serious he believed the situation to be. Even Jeremy admitted that he'd sounded panicked.

As the time and conversation went on and things began to sink in he did - he did not say that in the beginning ( according to the police)

[nugnug]

My mind was made up. But Nugs has got me all confused.

Saying Jeremy phoned the forth furthest away police station, rather than 999 because he wanted a certain type of police reaction. Although Jeremy has never said this.

im saying if just wanted want some protection or support theres no reason to phone 999.

if you just want to make sure everything is all right i mean by the time they got she might of put the gun down.

[Jane]

im saying if just wanted want some protection or support theres no reason to phone 999.

if you just want to make sure everything is all right i mean by the time they got she might of put the gun down.

What protection do you imagine he thought would be afforded him by a plod on a bike or a pop pop? The first thing he'd have done was call for back up. OH!!! I SEE, it would have wasted MORE time, wouldn't it?

[lookout]

Who lied in court ? Proof please.

There will be proof----------------eventually. ( fingers crossed on that score )

[nugnug]

What protection do you imagine he thought would be afforded him by a plod on a bike or a pop pop? The first thing he'd have done was call for back up. OH!!! I SEE, it would have wasted MORE time, wouldn't it?

for all he knew things might of calmed down by the time he got there.

if your going into a dangrous sitaun haveing sone else there with you is much better than going alone.

[Jane]

for all he knew things might of calmed down by the time he got there.

if your going into a dangrous sitaun haveing sone else there with you is much better than going alone.

But it wasn't his call to make, Nugs, and why would he chose to go into a dangerous situation and be accompanied ONLY by one unarmed guy, possibly on a pop pop? Which ever way one chooses to see it, Jeremy wasted time.

[Jan]

Who lied in court ? Proof please.

who did not lie - proof please.

[Jane]

who did not lie - proof please.

I'd call that an ace :D

[Adam]

who did not lie - proof please.

No one lied. There is no proof anyone did.

Apart from Jeremy. Of which there was a lot of proof. Both forensic and circumstantial.

Supporters are getting more desperate, claiming witnesses lied in court. Of which there is no proof.

[nugnug]

basic logic says when somone changes a statement they cant be telling the truth in both statments.

[Adam]

I suppose claiming witnesses lied in court is better than saying Sheila mistook the silencer for a tampon.

[Jan]

basic logic says when somone changes a statement they cant be telling the truth in both statments.

15 love

oops sounds like I was being over friendly

[Jan]

I suppose claiming witnesses lied in court is better than saying Sheila mistook the silencer for a tampon.

Don't attribute that to a group of people rather than an individual - its not clever.