Listen, birdbrain, I do not ignore anything....
You, do not know, and you have no idea what I have taken into consideration in arriving at my own conclusions. I am streets ahead of your current way of thinking, I have been there, considered it, weighed up the pro's and cons, in favour or against it, and moved on...
I know that what you are advocating is absolutely wrong, and that any right thinking member of the public will clearly see that there is merit in what I am promoting...
Your conclusions are clearly driven by bias and since you haven't refuted the evidence I raised it means you are just ignoring it.
You are ignoring that if she had been in front of the house there are 3 windows that she could have been referring to and there would be no way to isolate which of the 3 she meant. So you would not be able to establish she meant the master bedroom window.
You are ignoring objective evidence that Moule, ildinhall and Brown were the ones assigned to the red/white contianment site.
You are ignoring objective evidence that those Jeapes said she replaced were at the white containment site.
You are ignoring that there is no barn at the red/white containment site.
You are interpreting things on purpose in a manner that affords the pretense she was at the front of the house so you can then pretend she was talking about the master bedroom window and you ignore all evidence that proves this to be false. You know the truth you just don't want to admit it. This isn't a matter of you being confused and fooled by Jeapes you are playing games. You don't even sincerely believe the things you are writing. You can swear up and down you are a gullible codger who believes the things you write but I don't believe it. You could never convince me that you are dumb and gullible and thus honestly believe what you are peddling- you are are just playing games.