Author Topic: Another Freudian Slip?  (Read 42002 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Another Freudian Slip?
« Reply #585 on: October 30, 2015, 05:22:PM »
Sheila would have been with her babies and Neville probably didn't want to go and see a soppy picture.






Which reminds me,Sheila had wanted another baby didn't she ? I wonder if the poor thing thought that doing so would cement the marriage ?

Offline Stephanie

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7614
  • The facts leading to the Simon Hall confession
Re: Another Freudian Slip?
« Reply #586 on: October 30, 2015, 05:37:PM »
I was thinking the same thing AND how come they didn't ALL go to the cinema at the same time?  ;) ;D ;D

His next blog or the one after that may have them all going to the cinema together  ;D He may even point out which parent was a fan of Redford and Eastwood  ;D

Wonder what films he's referring to? Will he blog the titles of the films?

“The only people who are mad at you for telling the truth are those people who are living a lie. Keep telling the truth"

Offline Stephanie

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7614
  • The facts leading to the Simon Hall confession
Re: Another Freudian Slip?
« Reply #587 on: October 30, 2015, 05:42:PM »
I've just researched Clint Eastwood films and he didn't appear to make a many films in the 80's?

JB would have been 20 in 1981 - so his 20's would be up until 1990..

And he was 24 when he was arrested, so.....

I've only found 2 movies starring Eastwood in the early 80's?

Same for Redford?

Maybe the local cinemas were 'rehashing' the old films?  ;D or maybe he's confused?
« Last Edit: October 30, 2015, 05:47:PM by stephanie »
“The only people who are mad at you for telling the truth are those people who are living a lie. Keep telling the truth"

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21102
Re: Another Freudian Slip?
« Reply #588 on: October 30, 2015, 05:45:PM »
I wonder which one was the Good,the Bad and the Ugly..

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Another Freudian Slip?
« Reply #589 on: October 30, 2015, 05:48:PM »
 ;D ;D ;D ;D Very droll Steve. Or perhaps you were serious  :-[

Offline Stephanie

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7614
  • The facts leading to the Simon Hall confession
Re: Another Freudian Slip?
« Reply #590 on: October 30, 2015, 05:48:PM »
I wonder which one was the Good,the Bad and the Ugly..

He would have been 5 years old when that was released?
“The only people who are mad at you for telling the truth are those people who are living a lie. Keep telling the truth"

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: Another Freudian Slip?
« Reply #591 on: October 30, 2015, 06:03:PM »
He is supposed to have said that 1 to 2 days after the fact, so looking back in hindsight he said if I had gone over I would have been shot...?????

I agree .

Also I do still wonder if Neville was forced to make the call by Sheila.

people say lots of things when they know the facts - like Neville would never have made the call - but if the police had gone round there and Sheila was ranting and raving and had not fired a shot - no one would have thought the call was odd

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Another Freudian Slip?
« Reply #592 on: October 30, 2015, 06:14:PM »





Which reminds me,Sheila had wanted another baby didn't she ? I wonder if the poor thing thought that doing so would cement the marriage ?

Cement the marriage? They were DIVORCED!  ;D
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Another Freudian Slip?
« Reply #593 on: October 30, 2015, 06:16:PM »
In one blog he talks of reaching his twenties and going to the movies with 'friends' and in another blog he talks about going to the cinema with just his "mum" in his twenties? Very confusing....

Sorry Caroline just re-read your post (above) and you've already pointed this out...

Won't harm re-ittreating the fact....

Who did he go to the movies with in his twenties;

His Mum?

Or

His Friends?

Maybe they all went together to watch Clint Eastwood or was it Robert Redford? I'm confused!!  :-\
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: Another Freudian Slip?
« Reply #594 on: October 30, 2015, 06:16:PM »
Cement the marriage? They were DIVORCED!  ;D

you know what lookout means - the chance of a reconciliation which was talked about. Although I think that was in Sheilas head.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Another Freudian Slip?
« Reply #595 on: October 30, 2015, 06:17:PM »
Sheila would have been with her babies and Neville probably didn't want to go and see a soppy picture.

Soppy with Clint Eastwood or Robert Redford?? Nevill loved the pictures, he was especially fond of Clint Redford or maybe it was Robert Eastwood? ???
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Another Freudian Slip?
« Reply #596 on: October 30, 2015, 06:20:PM »
I agree .

Also I do still wonder if Neville was forced to make the call by Sheila.

people say lots of things when they know the facts - like Neville would never have made the call - but if the police had gone round there and Sheila was ranting and raving and had not fired a shot - no one would have thought the call was odd

he said it the following day when AE asked him. In fact it wasn't a day later, it was hours later and he said tht was he reason for not going over - so it wasn't in hindsight, it was he reason at the time.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: Another Freudian Slip?
« Reply #597 on: October 30, 2015, 06:22:PM »
its pretty obvious he meant WHEN he went with his mum later on Sheila did not go . Not that he JUST went with his mum.

And I remember lots of those films and I am the same age - but I just to watch them on TV- not the cinema as far as I remember .

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Another Freudian Slip?
« Reply #598 on: October 30, 2015, 06:23:PM »
I've just researched Clint Eastwood films and he didn't appear to make a many films in the 80's?

JB would have been 20 in 1981 - so his 20's would be up until 1990..

And he was 24 when he was arrested, so.....

I've only found 2 movies starring Eastwood in the early 80's?

Same for Redford?

Maybe the local cinemas were 'rehashing' the old films?  ;D or maybe he's confused?

I was just thinking that! My dad used to like Clint Eastwood and his movie going days would have been quite a few years before JB is talking about.  ;D ;D ;D
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Another Freudian Slip?
« Reply #599 on: October 30, 2015, 06:27:PM »
its pretty obvious he meant WHEN he went with his mum later on Sheila did not go . Not that he JUST went with his mum.

And I remember lots of those films and I am the same age - but I just to watch them on TV- not the cinema as far as I remember .

He said he stopped going to the pictures with his DAD when he learned to drive because we wanted to go with people his ow age. However, he's previously said that in his twenties he was still going to the pictures with his mother. It doesn't make any sense. I've seen pictures with CE and the RR but never at the pictures - he was talking about the cinema but mentions nothing about what they saw.
Few people have the imagination for reality