Another Freudian Slip?

[Caroline]

it neer ceases to amaze me how many peope now exatly what should of happend in a sitaun thee neer been in.

You receive a call at 3:10am, the words 'gun' 'crazy' 'come quick' are uttered in a 'panicked' voice by your father. What would a RATIONAL person do?

A. Call police on 999 (to be on the safe side)?
B. Come quick - as requested?
C. Both A and B?
D. Call someone completely unrelated to the situation who couldn't help even if they wanted to?
E. Mull it over then take time to look for local police station number?
F. Both D and E?

To West he said his dad sounded 'terrified', in his police interview he said his dad sounded 'panicked' to Ann Eaton he said he didn't go over there in case Sheila shot 'him too' and when asked why he didn't call 999, he said he didn't know on occasion, on others that either his family were private people (which makes no sense because he called police anyway) or that he didn't think the situation was serious.

I have no love for the police but none of the above makes any sense other than to have called 999 or to have gone to the farm as requested and ideally both. I know for a FACT Nugs that I WOULD have done the latter - without question and if you're honest with yourself, I'm sure you and most people here would have done the same!! I don't expect that people will be honest though, they will just make more excuses. 

[Caroline]

Not at all. It's far easier for yourselves to repeat what's already in place,than it is to bring something new to the argument.

What new things have you brought?

[lookout]

Hi Susan.
They " might " be interesting,but WILL they tell us any more than we already supposedly know.?
I think anyone who has an ounce of uncertainty would agree that all is not well with this case.

I'm actually waiting on some info that won't be contained in either book.

[Caroline]

Your argument takes very little thought as it's easier to condemn someone than it is to support them, without the evidence that condemned them in the first place,forensic or otherwise.
This is why EP went for the easiest option.

Whereas your argument takes none at all, all you do is agree with Jeremy. You're in denial Lookout and even if you did have doubts, I don't think you would ever admit them. You can't even admit when you have made a mistake.

EP didn't go for the easiest option, the easiest option would have been to stick to their guns about Sheila. Changing to Jeremy brought then a LOT of criticism hence why their was an enquiry. 

[Caroline]

Hi Susan.
They " might " be interesting,but WILL they tell us any more than we already supposedly know.?
I think anyone who has an ounce of uncertainty would agree that all is not well with this case.

I'm actually waiting on some info that won't be contained in either book.

Good luck with that! 

[susan]

You receive a call at 3:10am, the words 'gun' 'crazy' 'come quick' are uttered in a 'panicked' voice by your father. What would a RATIONAL person do?

A. Call police on 999 (to be on the safe side)?
B. Come quick - as requested?
C. Both A and B?
D. Call someone completely unrelated to the situation who couldn't help even if they wanted to?
E. Mull it over then take time to look for local police station number?
F. Both D and E?

To West he said his dad sounded 'terrified', in his police interview he said his dad sounded 'panicked' to Ann Eaton he said he didn't go over there in case Sheila shot 'him too' and when asked why he didn't call 999, he said he didn't know on occasion, on others that either his family were private people (which makes no sense because he called police anyway) or that he didn't think the situation was serious.

I have no love for the police but none of the above makes any sense other than to have called 999 or to have gone to the farm as requested and ideally both. I know for a FACT Nugs that I WOULD have done the latter - without question and if you're honest with yourself, I'm sure you and most people here would have done the same!! I don't expect that people will be honest though, they will just make more excuses.

Caroline thinking about this situation if I were ever in it I guess I would jump in my car and drive over hoping I could sort it out with my sister and my Dad but if I thought it had gone passed that point I would dial 999 don't even have to think about it.

[lookout]

Good luck with that! 

Thankyou.

[Caroline]

Caroline thinking about this situation if I were ever in it I guess I would jump in my car and drive over hoping I could sort it out with my sister and my Dad but if I thought it had gone passed that point I would dial 999 don't even have to think about it.

Of course Susan, those are the only two sensible options.

[lookout]

Jeremy could quite easily have told the police " that he too had been threatened if he dared go near WHF ". After all,why should he have cared what he had to say at that juncture,knowing the'd all died ?" A good,thought-out murderer would have " planned " it better ??

[Caroline]

Jeremy could quite easily have told the police " that he too had been threatened if he dared go near WHF ". After all,why should he have cared what he had to say at that juncture,knowing the'd all died ?" A good,thought-out murderer would have " planned " it better ??

Then he would have had no excuse for NOT calling 999!  . I agree but Jeremy wasn't a 'good murderer' which us why he got caught!

[lookout]

What new things have you brought?

That's just it--------------I'm not obliged to say,unless someone beats me to it. This is the price for remaining loyal, " that I haven't brought any new things to an argument ".

[Caroline]

That's just it--------------I'm not obliged to say,unless someone beats me to it. This is the price for remaining loyal, " that I haven't brought any new things to an argument ".

You haven't brought anything new (cept for hinting about the J top) because you haven't got anything new to bring - just the promise of it.

[Jane]

Surely then, the police were also in denial from the 7th August to the 8th of September, because they excepted his story about not dialing 999.

The charm of a psychopath who can persuade usually very rational people to accept the ridiculous??

[nugnug]

Whereas your argument takes none at all, all you do is agree with Jeremy. You're in denial Lookout and even if you did have doubts, I don't think you would ever admit them. You can't even admit when you have made a mistake.

EP didn't go for the easiest option, the easiest option would have been to stick to their guns about Sheila. Changing to Jeremy brought then a LOT of criticism hence why their was an enquiry. 

do you think everybody who doesnt agrea with you about somthing is in denial.

[Jane]

Hi Susan.
They " might " be interesting,but WILL they tell us any more than we already supposedly know.?
I think anyone who has an ounce of uncertainty would agree that all is not well with this case.

I'm actually waiting on some info that won't be contained in either book.

But a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush, Lookout. There's no guarantee that anything other than rehashed old material will....................REmaterialize!!!