Author Topic: Another Freudian Slip?  (Read 42085 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Another Freudian Slip?
« on: April 05, 2015, 10:31:PM »
According to AE's statement (taken between 8th and 13th Sept) she asked Jeremy why he didn't go to WHF as allegedly requested by Nevill's phone call - Jeremy replied that he was frightened that the call may have been a trick in order to lure him to the farm so Sheila could 'shoot him too'. At this point (after the supposed call from Nevill) Jeremy isn't supposed to know that anyone had been shot!
Few people have the imagination for reality

guest154

  • Guest
Re: Another Freudian Slip?
« Reply #1 on: April 05, 2015, 10:34:PM »
It is weird that he is claiming in the minutes after the phone call he was worried he was being lured to WHF so he could be shot too.
There is no reason that should of entered his head at that time BUT if it had - then he WOULD of called 999 at that point.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Another Freudian Slip?
« Reply #2 on: April 05, 2015, 10:36:PM »
It is weird that he is claiming in the minutes after the phone call he was worried he was being lured to WHF so he could be shot too.
There is no reason that should of entered his head at that time BUT if it had - then he WOULD of called 999 at that point.

He wasn't supposed to know that anyone had been shot  ;)
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33781
Re: Another Freudian Slip?
« Reply #3 on: April 05, 2015, 10:39:PM »
He wasn't supposed to know that anyone had been shot  ;)




Allegedly, Nevill told him ONLY that Sheila had the gun and gave no indication that it had been used. Jeremy said he was afraid "She would SHOOT ME TOO"

Offline jon

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1437
Re: Another Freudian Slip?
« Reply #4 on: April 05, 2015, 10:40:PM »
According to AE's statement (taken between 8th and 13th Sept) she asked Jeremy why he didn't go to WHF as allegedly requested by Nevill's phone call - Jeremy replied that he was frightened that the call may have been a trick in order to lure him to the farm so Sheila could 'shoot him too'. At this point (after the supposed call from Nevill) Jeremy isn't supposed to know that anyone had been shot!
Is this the same AE you claimed perjured herself , by claiming she saw , a blob of blood that looked like jam , on a silencer , you yourself proving it was not possible ? Did you not actually cut yourself to prove her a liar ?

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Another Freudian Slip?
« Reply #5 on: April 05, 2015, 10:46:PM »
Is this the same AE you claimed perjured herself , by claiming she saw , a blob of blood that looked like jam , on a silencer , you yourself proving it was not possible ? Did you not actually cut yourself to prove her a liar ?

Is this thread about the silencer? Might you be deflecting attention because you can't answer the point? But just for you I'll reiterate that - I don't think the silencer was used! However, when Jeremy was making his statement, there were others present and being as Ann didn't make a great fuss about the above point, she clearly didn't see the significance.

If you have a point to make about the topic, lets hear it, if you want to talk about the silencer - there are plenty of other threads that deal with it.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21102
Re: Another Freudian Slip?
« Reply #6 on: April 05, 2015, 10:50:PM »
Maybe he was just looking back over the whole morning and wanted to present it in the most dramatic possible terms. We know how he loves to hold court..

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Another Freudian Slip?
« Reply #7 on: April 05, 2015, 10:51:PM »
Maybe he was just looking back over the whole morning and wanted to present it in the most dramatic possible terms. We know how he loves to hold court..

That wouldn't make sense to the comment he made.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline jon

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1437
Re: Another Freudian Slip?
« Reply #8 on: April 05, 2015, 10:54:PM »
Is this thread about the silencer? Might you be deflecting attention because you can't answer the point? But just for you I'll reiterate that - I don't think the silencer was used! However, when Jeremy was making his statement, there were others present and being as Ann didn't make a great fuss about the above point, she clearly didn't see the significance.

If you have a point to make about the topic, lets hear it, if you want to talk about the silencer - there are plenty of other threads that deal with it.
My question to you is simple , does AE only tell lies about the silencer ?

Offline Patti

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13193
Re: Another Freudian Slip?
« Reply #9 on: April 05, 2015, 10:54:PM »
He is supposed to have said that 1 to 2 days after the fact, so looking back in hindsight he said if I had gone over I would have been shot...?????

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21102
Re: Another Freudian Slip?
« Reply #10 on: April 05, 2015, 10:57:PM »
My question to you is simple , does AE only tell lies about the silencer ?
My own view is if there was any foul play over the silencer it was Robert Boutflour behind it and not his daughter. It must be incredibly difficult to reaffirm lies within such a detailed statement as she gave.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33781
Re: Another Freudian Slip?
« Reply #11 on: April 05, 2015, 10:59:PM »
My own view is if there was any foul play over the silencer it was Robert Boutflour behind it and not his daughter. It must be incredibly difficult to reaffirm lies within such a detailed statement as she gave.



RWB made no bones about the fact that he expected total obedience from his children, albeit they were adult.

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: Another Freudian Slip?
« Reply #12 on: April 05, 2015, 11:02:PM »
IF he is innocent he must have felt he made a huge amount of mistakes on the night which resulted in the death of his whole family - I think he was just trying to cover up for the fact that he probably was quite cowardly . In retrospect it is easy to judge - but perhaps he felt if he had not called the police or Julie and gone over immediately he may have been able to help. Don't forget that if he is innocent there has been a huge amount of character assasination so we don't truly know how he fitted into the family and whether he could have calmed things down . The fact is we know now that if innocent , he probably could not have helped so probably would have been shot.

Offline scipio_usmc

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9502
Re: Another Freudian Slip?
« Reply #13 on: April 06, 2015, 12:28:AM »
According to AE's statement (taken between 8th and 13th Sept) she asked Jeremy why he didn't go to WHF as allegedly requested by Nevill's phone call - Jeremy replied that he was frightened that the call may have been a trick in order to lure him to the farm so Sheila could 'shoot him too'. At this point (after the supposed call from Nevill) Jeremy isn't supposed to know that anyone had been shot!

This is one of those things I use as an example that Jeremy told different people different things.  Note that he didn't use this excuse with the police or at trial.  This was constructed specifically for his family to provide an excuse for why he didn't go over.  It is like when he told Colin Caffell that Sheila did it because June and Nevill decided she had to give custody of the kids to someone else.  That is not what he told anyone else but Collin it was designed just for him.  He didn't use these claims with police because they were defective.  He figured it was good enough to use on them though.

       
Politeness is organized indifference- Paul Valéry

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Another Freudian Slip?
« Reply #14 on: April 06, 2015, 02:30:AM »
My question to you is simple , does AE only tell lies about the silencer ?

Your question is irrelevant!
Few people have the imagination for reality