Peter Eatons fingerprints found on bloodstained ammunition box found in cupboard

[mike tesko]

Procedures not followed, allowing dodgy silencer, blood and paint evidence, to be introduced to help convict Jeremy Bamber of the murders:-


103. There are certain protocols that have to be followed in order to allow for evidential weight to be accorded to that item. The public’s witness statement must contain the following; a) The laboratory item and exhibit number. b) The item must be described. c) The location from where it was discovered must be stated. d) The date and time it was found must be stated. e) How it was handled, i.e. was it placed with other items where it could have been contaminated, did the handler wear gloves? f) The method of transportation of the item, from where it was stored prior to being given to the Police. g) Who handled the exhibit between its discovery, and it being submitted to the forensic team at the laboratory. h) Finally, how was it packaged.

[mike tesko]

The missing pages of evidence from witness statements:-


104. Similarly, Insp. Cranwell as the Laboratory Liaison Officer was assisted by DS Lovell, (see Document C-8/9) and that they gave testimony to COLP when they made their enquiry. 

105. Both officers made a declaration that their original witness statements were four pages in length, however, both of these witness statements have been edited prior to their disclosure and are now three pages in length. 

[mike tesko]

Word perfect witness statements, made three weeks a part:-


106. In addition both statements can be seen to be word for word identical, yet A/Insp. Cranwell made his statement on 7th August 1991, while DS Lovell wrote his on 29th August 1991. 

[mike tesko]

Like peas in a pod, identical in every way, even to the extent that both had a page missing - except for the names of the witnesses, which have not been changed, to protect the guilty:-

107. It is submitted that these two officers colluded in falsifying corroboration and that COLP found this as fact and concealed it from Jeremy Bamber when he made his complaint to the Police Complaints Commission. 

[mike tesko]

No police records to show sound moderator properly kept in police possession between 13th and 30th August 1985:-


108. While COLP admits, ‘The question of the evidential quality appertaining to this silencer has been reflected on at length in the reports dealing with Allegations 1 and 3. In the main it has revolved around its integrity and whether continuity can be established. This whole area is open to debate and none more so than the custody of the silencer between 13th August 1985 and 30th August 1985,’ 
COLP then goes on to state, ‘I believe we can establish, to reasonable satisfaction, that the silencer was properly retained by police during this period. I say ‘reasonable satisfaction’ advisably because unless something is retained under indisputably secure conditions with guaranteed records then a small area of uncertainty will always remain,’ (see COLP Allegation 2 paragraphs 2.61, 2.62, 001919, 001920; our italics).

[mike tesko]

COLP investigation was bias (not impartial):-


109. It could be argued that prima facie COLP failed in their duty of care to Jeremy Bamber in establishing that the protocol that governs the provenance of an exhibit, not found by a Police Officer, was clearly breached, calling into question the whole tenure of his trial in the first instance. However we allege that this lack of enquiry has to do with the motive asserted earlier, that COLP had an agenda in not undertaking their investigation with impartiality, (see paragraphs 164 - 165 of this submission).

[mike tesko]

Misguided intentions:-


110. Indeed their enquiry lacks probity. Their investigation clearly shows incongruity in the assertions and factual information gathering of the crime scene in the first instance by officers of Essex Police, which they have culpably ignored.

[guest2181]

Something I find of particular interest is that a Jeremy supporter posted most of the Dickinson report on Sleuthing for Justice but failed to post what are among the most important parts. Harters copied what was posted but paras 305-320 are missing.  These paras are the ones that would detail what was collected from Eaton in September, when various test firing of the gun took place and when the lab tested the blood for the grouping tests.  Isn't it funny how the supporter refused to post these sections which could demolish the allegations he was making....

I have come to the conclusion that Mike is too frightened to post those paragraphs.

[scipio_usmc]

I have come to the conclusion that Mike is too frightened to post those paragraphs.

I agree, I think these paragraphs contain details that severely harm his allegations.