Like I said, he hadn't done it before so it was a question of learning as he went. There may have been a lot that he'd have done differently had he had time over again...................trouble was, he didn't.
But surely he would have learnt that the gun with silencer was too long after the first failed shot.
I hear what you are saying. In the heat of the moment mistakes would be made and there is no template to follow. It just seems a stretch too far that after these blunders he would replace the silencer and then invent the phone call, which would obviously implicate himself if the silencer was discovered.
He could not be wholly confident that the suicide of Sheila would be accepted after messing up so spectacularly, not only needing two shots but also using a silencer for both shots despite it being too long. But we are to believe that he went ahead with a plan that pointed to his guilt the moment it was discovered that Sheila was murdered.
As a matter of interest, April, do you believe in the silencer evidence or do you believe it fabricated?
I ask not to argue over the silencer evidence on this thread but as a matter of interest. It is possible to believe that the silencer evidence is fabricated and that Jeremy is guilty obviously, as I am aware that some do.