What Makes Supporters Believe Jeremy is Innocent?

[lookout]

Don't you know ? He got in through the keyhole  Or he could have done if every room hadn't been locked from the inside and the key remained in the lock !!
So tell us all how he got out of a room which had been locked from the inside with NO means of escape ?

[nugnug]

Not in my books he didn't do it. No. I've never seen a more farcical and bungled investigation carried out since I watched the Keystone Kops.

Bicycle,wetsuit,ets,etc. No forensic evidence,the list could go on,and does.

the wetsuit is the sort of thing you might read in a fictional detective story.

[lookout]

the wetsuit is the sort of thing you might read in a fictional detective story.

I couldn't believe that it WAS believed.

[Adam]

I couldn't believe that it WAS believed.

Well it is almost certain that Jeremy cycled to WHF. The bike was brought over just before the massacre. RB said there was a way out of Jeremy's back garden into the fields. RB said the cycle journey was easy and passed no dwellings.

Bob Woffinden and RB suggested Bamber wore a wet suit. It was not discussed in court or at Bamber's police interviews.

There are threads on both issues.

[lookout]

I couldn't care less how many threads/links/newspapers/books state what those two said. One only said it because of the other who happened to have been a " pillar of the community ". Doesn't was with me. Woffinden is conspicuous by his absence these days and has probably gone on to other things a little less taxing to his brain.

[nugnug]

I couldn't believe that it WAS believed.

well imagine if you approached the police and said i think this guy i know committed while wearing a wetsuit riding a womans bicycle what do you think they would say to you.

[lookout]

well imagine if you approached the police and said i think this guy i know committed while wearing a wetsuit riding a womans bicycle what do you think they would say to you.

Go home to bed,missus. You'll be better in the morning.

[scipio_usmc]

Talk about a general question.

You know what they are.

The relatives, Julie and police all lied. The silencer was somehow expertly contaminated and Neville called the police. There were 'conversations in the house' and two bodies found in the kitchen.

There is of course no proof of this. But that's just a minor detail.

This is a good question.  Many times we have tried to understand the position and motivations.  Leave it to you to try to ruin the thread out of jealousy because you didn't start it.

[lookout]

This is a good question.  Many times we have tried to understand the position and motivations.  Leave it to you to try to ruin the thread out of jealousy because you didn't start it.

I take it that you know Adam,then.

[Jan]

Why is it that posters can not let others give their opinions without being nasty or vindictive . It has been proven on nearly every point that there are differing "expert" opinions .

And Nearly every aspect of the case can be looked at from opposing views ( because that's all they are) So really you are left with two things - JM and the silencer.

Personally I have never dismissed them but I find her statements and testimony (IMO) a load of tosh. I can not see anyway on earth she would have Identified the twins and supported JB at the funeral and for a month afterwards knowing what she said she knew.

The moderator - I have read the statements of those involved and they all vary . And again I find the situation of taking it home and away from the crime scene ridiculous.


There are lots of other reasons I think JB is innocent and personally I think I am entitled to my opinion without nastiness and ridicule from certain posters .

[Caroline]

This is a good question.  Many times we have tried to understand the position and motivations.  Leave it to you to try to ruin the thread out of jealousy because you didn't start it.

It was inevitable - best ignore him, his input was never required in the first place.

[Jane]

Why is it that posters can not let others give their opinions without being nasty or vindictive . It has been proven on nearly every point that there are differing "expert" opinions .

And Nearly every aspect of the case can be looked at from opposing views ( because that's all they are) So really you are left with two things - JM and the silencer.

Personally I have never dismissed them but I find her statements and testimony (IMO) a load of tosh. I can not see anyway on earth she would have Identified the twins and supported JB at the funeral and for a month afterwards knowing what she said she knew.

The moderator - I have read the statements of those involved and they all vary . And again I find the situation of taking it home and away from the crime scene ridiculous.


There are lots of other reasons I think JB is innocent and personally I think I am entitled to my opinion without nastiness and ridicule from certain posters .

Much as I HATE comparing this case with any other, I was intrigued to hear that the girl friend of the guy who is being charged with murdering his step sister, is being charged with perverting the cause of justice. What has she done that Julie didn't?

[John]

There are lots of other reasons I think JB is innocent and personally I think I am entitled to my opinion without nastiness and ridicule from certain posters .

Unfortunately for you and the handful of AN Others, the evidence points clearly to his involvement so thinking he is innocent amounts to nothing more than semantics.

[Jan]

Well it looks like she certainly knew what happened and covered it up because she was appealing for help on facebook apparently. I guess the difference is she got found out and did not come forward and  tell the police .

[lookout]

Much as I HATE comparing this case with any other, I was intrigued to hear that the girl friend of the guy who is being charged with murdering his step sister, is being charged with perverting the cause of justice. What has she done that Julie didn't?

Another Huntley girlfriend ? This is why the justice system is skewed and also corrupt !!
It also depends on how good an actress you are too. Feigning vulnerability counts for a lot.