I wonder how many more who are in prison without benefit of what you deem to be "proper" evidence, but as you have previously stated, you have no interest in their cases. It is VERY possible however that despite what you refer to as lack of "proper" evidence, they are, indeed, guilty. I'm told that other than those who have admitted their guilt, EVERY prisoner is innocent. That would put more innocent people behind bars than in front of them, wouldn't it?
I don't doubt for one minute that there aren't MANY in prison who shouldn't be there. Jordan Cunliffe,who was used,because he's slightly backward and has problems with his eyesight. He happened to have been jailed " by association " and not having committed the crime itself.
In some cases I believe in this but like the " Human Rights ",it's been abused.
Jordan was with the gang who killed Gary Newlove,but he wasn't the one who murdered the man. Those like Jordan should be questioned as well as background checks made,and a thorough investigation done before being sent to prison.
This has also been treated as a MOJ. Checks SHOULD have been made on Jordan,as should be made on all those who are in prison just " for being at a scene of murder ",as those who have a low IQ are more likely to be in cahoots with gangs of this type,which doesn't always necessarily mean that they're capable of inflicting harm.
I've never said that every prisoner is innocent.Those are entirely your own words.What I am saying is the amount of prisoners who haven't been afforded a proper investigation at the beginning.Jeremy being one of them.