What 'particular' aspects of the case convince supporters that Jeremy is 'innocent'?
I have never been 100% sure that Jeremy is innocent although I tend to think he is.
The few percent that spoils it for me is the cleanness of Sheila and the silencer evidence. Although, both the cleanness and the silencer cold have an alternative to be considered.
The 10-2 majority. Not all the jurors thought he was guilty.
I am very suspicious of Jones, especially when he met the girls off duty and attended the bank with them. He also told Colin not to mention he had changed his statement in court otherwise it would cause problems. Plus, a year later he attended the girls flat to verify times on one of the clocks although the clock its self had been altered due to the clocks being put back in October 1985. He was the one that took the silencer. He was the one that was there that day when a paint sample was taken from the under shelf of the AGA. A yellow sticker marks the place where the paint sample was taken, yet they failed to notice the scratch marks which were a inch away. Jones was in it up to his neck, even to the point where he tells AE not to mention that he had taken a pair of black canvas shoes from Sheila's bedroom. I do not trust his involvement in the case.
The windows, need I say anymore about them?
The blood evidence was never fully examined.
No real forensic evidence was ever supplied in court other than the silencer evidence and even that could be flawed in court of today.
The blood on Sheila's arm form the wrist could have been back spatter, this was never fully examined.
The draw-back was fully examined in court.
The telephone was never fingerprinted.
Then there is the NOTW deal.
DNA?
?
Its not what is said in court that provided the best evidence its the forensic evidence that tells the truth.
