Author Topic: Russia - worrying?  (Read 365280 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline scipio_usmc

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9502
Re: Russia - worrying?
« Reply #165 on: March 09, 2015, 04:58:PM »
   There are no lies from me and if there are then I have no doubt that you can highlight them for me.
    To claim that Bush didn't lie about the intelligence agency assessments is a generous interpretation. It is well known now that the politicians misrepresented the intelligence and told outright lies. Dr. David Kelly the UN weapons inspector, who was outed as the source to the BBC's Andrew Gilligan, claimed that politicians had "sexed up" the intelligence and made claims that were unsupported by the intelligence. He was found dead in a bizarre supposed suicide. Imagine a Russian scientist claiming that Putin was lying about such an issue and outing his lies and then turning up dead. What would you make of that?
      Mobile chemical labs and the 45 minutes to launch WMD claims are and were supported by nothing. Colin Powell's speech to the UN has become infamous for the amount of lies and deceptions it contains. Colin Powell himself has said since that his speech would be a "blot on his record". Most people regard this as lying funnily enough.
    Your recollections are just wrong scipio. Everyone did not know that Iraq were in violation of the Disarmament protocols  (not a ceasefire agreement). The US at the time were pushing for war whatever the intelligence said. If you still believe this utterly discredited shit then there is no hope for you. The "sexed up" intelligence was an attempt by the US to gain legal cover from the UN for their war but it was going ahead anyway.
   When you say "it was thought" and that "there was an expectation" you fail to clarify by whom. These are not the kind of statements and intelligence that justify invading another country.
   Did you research the Zogby poll and compare it to the polls that you posted and is that why you haven't discussed them further?
   The PIPA poll that you linked to simply has no credibility. It is funded by the likes of the Rockefeller foundation and The Ploughshares Fund. The "advisors" to these funders of PIPA are packed with white American conservatives and lots of military men as well as John Kerry. The polling was carried out on behalf of CNN and USA Today and was carried out by the Pan Arab Research Centre. The Pan Arab Research Centre is owned by M. A. Kharafi and Sons. It is fair to say that the Kharafi's have extensive interests elsewhere and that they cannot be seen as impartial.
    The poll by PIPA, in summary, was commissioned by two biased American "news" channels. The polling organisation used was a group whose funding comes from supporters and sponsors of US aggression. The polling itself was carried out by an organisation with extensive commercial interests which call into question their impartiality. It is not worth the paper it is written on and is simply self serving and not an attempt to genuinely gauge Iraqi opinions. It is an attempt at justification by the very vested interests who sponsored it in the first place.
    "Getting rid of Saddam to establish a democracy was a very good thing". If they had got rid of Saddam for this reason it would be illegal under international law though wouldn't it? And who decides that it is a very good thing because there are millions of Iraqis who would disagree, but no doubt the mighty scipio would be able to tell them that they are all biased idiots who refuse to accept the evidence fabricated by the perpetrators themselves.
   
   

Producing evidence that the intelligence communities were wrong doesn't in any way establish Bush lied.

You are the one lying by trying to pretend that the World's intelligence agencies didn't judge what they did and instead pretending Bush simply made it up.

You also lied about the polls regarding the attitudes of the people of Iraq.  I post how the people of Iraq support deposing Saddam.  A majority of Iraqis support such even though the transition has been rough just like the transition from Socialism to Capitalism in the Iron curtain was rough but deemed worth it.   Instead of being honest and producing the results of such polls you resort to polls of whether their life is hard and try to pretend that such polls mean that Iraqis didn't want Saddam overthrown. You are biased and dishonest.

You already have little credibility but you further diminish any chance of having any when you praise Russian aggression and misrepresent Russian invasions of other countries as reasonable self-defense actions.  Invading Georgia and Ukraine wasn't self-defense.  Invading a country to annex ports is not reasonable self-defense actions.  If it is then that means the US can invade any country it desires to steal ports for our vessels.

You are an apologist for Russian aggression and ridiculously attack the US as being an aggressor.  You have things completely backwards and remind me of the Marxist apologists during the Cold War who loved the USSR and defended everything it did while trashing the West and Capitalism.     

indeed a great number of people like you tried suggesting ISIS wasn't so bad and the West was intentionally distorting about them in order to justify invading sovereign nations.  ISIS is running wild trying to wipe out the non-Muslim populations of the land they occupy, brutalizing any Muslims who stand up to them and destroying historic treasures.  They are barbarians the World was not making up things to justify taking action.  Despite these real horrors the World is not taking action in earnest because the leaders of the World don't care enough to do what is necessary.

Politeness is organized indifference- Paul Valéry

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17253
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: Russia - worrying?
« Reply #166 on: March 09, 2015, 05:05:PM »
a partly agrea with you it was actully bill clintons lie bush just repeated it wether he knew what he was saying was untrue or not well that cant be proven ethere way.

guest7363

  • Guest
Re: Russia - worrying?
« Reply #167 on: March 09, 2015, 07:30:PM »
then we don't really know if its true  :(  Bronson to my understanding is isolated and not allowed to mix with others
The Krays and Me - Blood, Honour and Respect. Doing ...read his Book or google the link?

Offline gringo

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3414
Re: Russia - worrying?
« Reply #168 on: March 09, 2015, 08:45:PM »
Producing evidence that the intelligence communities were wrong doesn't in any way establish Bush lied.

You are the one lying by trying to pretend that the World's intelligence agencies didn't judge what they did and instead pretending Bush simply made it up.

You also lied about the polls regarding the attitudes of the people of Iraq.  I post how the people of Iraq support deposing Saddam.  A majority of Iraqis support such even though the transition has been rough just like the transition from Socialism to Capitalism in the Iron curtain was rough but deemed worth it.   Instead of being honest and producing the results of such polls you resort to polls of whether their life is hard and try to pretend that such polls mean that Iraqis didn't want Saddam overthrown. You are biased and dishonest.

You already have little credibility but you further diminish any chance of having any when you praise Russian aggression and misrepresent Russian invasions of other countries as reasonable self-defense actions.  Invading Georgia and Ukraine wasn't self-defense.  Invading a country to annex ports is not reasonable self-defense actions.  If it is then that means the US can invade any country it desires to steal ports for our vessels.

You are an apologist for Russian aggression and ridiculously attack the US as being an aggressor.  You have things completely backwards and remind me of the Marxist apologists during the Cold War who loved the USSR and defended everything it did while trashing the West and Capitalism.     

indeed a great number of people like you tried suggesting ISIS wasn't so bad and the West was intentionally distorting about them in order to justify invading sovereign nations.  ISIS is running wild trying to wipe out the non-Muslim populations of the land they occupy, brutalizing any Muslims who stand up to them and destroying historic treasures.  They are barbarians the World was not making up things to justify taking action.  Despite these real horrors the World is not taking action in earnest because the leaders of the World don't care enough to do what is necessary.
   Everybody knows that the US and UK governments lied to go to war. To misrepresent this as intelligence failures is mendacious. The number of intelligence agents who have spoken since and at the time make it quite clear that the politicians deliberately exaggerated the intelligence. They asked for intelligence that would justify war. Any following of these events at the time made clear that the US was pushing for war at the UN. It wasn't other countries that had hundreds of thousands of troops massed ready to invade and bomb Iraq before war had supposedly been decided upon.
     Were the US military there just in case? or do you think that they were going to war whatever the world thought? The US were wrong to invade Iraq and this is not even disputed by anyone informed.
    To claim that the Russians are the aggressors on the world stage is ignoring the evidence in front of you.
    You are self evidently a war apologist and your understanding of the Ukraine conflict has clearly been fed to you by the US State Dept. You may be stupid enough to believe in US exceptionalism but the rest of us see the US as world bullies. The reason that they can act in this way on the world stage is because there are enough gullible, brainwashed and half informed voters to allow it. You are obviously among their number.
    Your attacks are so ridiculous that you have to put words into my mouth by claiming that I am an ISIS apologist. The wars that you support created ISIS. Without the Iraq invasion, the bombing of Libya and the US funding of Islamist rebels in Syria ISIS would not even exist. US interventions cause far more harm than good and the evidence for this is all around.
     Regarding the polls, I put forward to you a number of facts which you have just ignored. I know that it is because those truths are uncomfortable for you and that you have no reply so you just fall back on your usual tactic when faced with uncomfortable truths by resorting to ad hom attacks and calling people liars. Tell me where I lied about the polls. The ones you posted were carried out by demonstrably biased parties and if you dispute my findings then do so with your own evidence to refute what I said. If you cannot do so don't worry you can just call me a liar without actually bothering to point out any lies.
     I may have little credibility with you but that is to be expected with someone like you and I would have more cause to be concerned if you regarded me credible. Your arrogance in believing that you are the final word on each and every subject is staggering to behold, especially from someone so ill informed. 
     I watched Fox News last night for an hour or so(I know!!) and the bias and hysteria is a sight to behold and then it occurred to me that it was like listening to the News by Scip :o :o.
    The views on Iran and the Middle East in general are so lacking in balance and nuance that they are beyond satire.
    Your views are Iraq, Iran, Russia etc. are shared by a small minority of the world and most of those are American Republican supporters. The rest of the world view the US as the number 1 threat to world peace.
    Do yourself a favour and do a search on " biggest threat to world peace poll" if you disbelieve me or think I am lying. I did that search and lots of polls came up and they were consistent in their findings. There are lots to choose from and the polling took place over lots of countries.
     Who do you think the world views as the biggest threat then Scip? Could it be Russia or perhaps Iran?
     Funnily enough they were not even close so you have much work to do. The biggest threat by a considerable margin was the US so it appears that the world is full of people with little credibility who are biased and dishonest. Either that or horror of horrors you are a self aggrandising half informed war apologist. Even in America the US tied for third place with North Korea as biggest threat to world peace.
     Your on the wrong side of the argument scip, but that's nothing new to you :o
   
« Last Edit: March 09, 2015, 08:46:PM by gringo »

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13795
Re: Russia - worrying?
« Reply #169 on: March 09, 2015, 09:40:PM »
The wars that you support created ISIS.   

Correction, The incompetent Iraqi army is responsible for ISIS

Offline gringo

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3414
Re: Russia - worrying?
« Reply #170 on: March 09, 2015, 09:43:PM »
Correction, The incompetent Iraqi army is responsible for ISIS
  Who trained the incompetent Iraqi Army?
     Not that your summary is correct, but if it was, the incompetence of the Iraqi Army can be laid directly at the US door.
     You're not very good at this are you?
« Last Edit: March 09, 2015, 09:44:PM by gringo »

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13795
Re: Russia - worrying?
« Reply #171 on: March 09, 2015, 09:59:PM »
  Who trained the incompetent Iraqi Army?
     Not that your summary is correct, but if it was, the incompetence of the Iraqi Army can be laid directly at the US door.
     You're not very good at this are you?

The Iraqi army was responsible for state security and it failed. Half the Iraqi army joined ISIS the other half ran away like cowards.

As for WMD how about a former Iraqi airforce general is that a reliable enough source for you?

http://youtu.be/nrSl30UIPRs?t=10s




Offline scipio_usmc

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9502
Re: Russia - worrying?
« Reply #172 on: March 09, 2015, 10:13:PM »
Correction, The incompetent Iraqi army is responsible for ISIS

That's why ISIS was able to take over swaths of Iraq it is not what enabled ISIS to commence operations though. It started in Syria which gringo is intentionally ignoring.  ISIS was able to flourish in Syria because the World chose to let a dictator remain in power and this for him to he maintained power in select areas and ceding power to Islamic fundamentalists in another.  The World did nothing to establish a sane democratic government in Syria so now it is split among 2 different horrible regimes one of which is invading its neighbors.

I'm no fan of the Iraqi government but at least it is not a threat to their neighbors and not brutalizing its own people.   It failute to adequately defend its people from a foreign threat is the most serious criticism to level.
Politeness is organized indifference- Paul Valéry


Offline gringo

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3414
Re: Russia - worrying?
« Reply #174 on: March 09, 2015, 10:44:PM »
That's why ISIS was able to take over swaths of Iraq it is not what enabled ISIS to commence operations though. It started in Syria which gringo is intentionally ignoring.  ISIS was able to flourish in Syria because the World chose to let a dictator remain in power and this for him to he maintained power in select areas and ceding power to Islamic fundamentalists in another.  The World did nothing to establish a sane democratic government in Syria so now it is split among 2 different horrible regimes one of which is invading its neighbors.

I'm no fan of the Iraqi government but at least it is not a threat to their neighbors and not brutalizing its own people.   It failute to adequately defend its people from a foreign threat is the most serious criticism to level.
  Far from ignoring Syria I have mentioned it a number of times. Your analysis could have been written by the US State Dept. The US funded and armed rebels in Syria. Even NATO admit that Assad has the support of the majority of Syria, which is a secular state under Assad. He may be far from perfect but ISIS are much worse.
     However much you would like to deny it, ISIS are the direct result of US interference. Had the US not invaded Iraq and disbanded the Army in their de-baathication of Iraq then ISIS and Al Qaeda would never have had a presence there. The US unleashed the chaos and there are those in the US now calling for yet more war against Iran. Needless to say it is Republicans like McCain and the usual war mongering suspects.
      Had the US not interfered in Syria, by pretending that the rebels that they supported in Syria were in any way representative of what the Syrians themselves want, then ISIS would not now be swarming all over the Middle East.
      Your lack of nuance and context in your ill informed analysis is embarrassing. Why do you think the majority of the world stands against your wars? Why do you think that by a considerable margin the rest of the world sees the US as the biggest threat to world peace?, even the brainwashed US public put themselves at joint third with North Korea.
      Does none of this tell you anything or are you that blind and arrogant that you cannot consider the possibility that the US are the biggest danger to the planet?
« Last Edit: March 09, 2015, 10:47:PM by gringo »

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13795
Re: Russia - worrying?
« Reply #175 on: March 09, 2015, 10:55:PM »
That's why ISIS was able to take over swaths of Iraq it is not what enabled ISIS to commence operations though. It started in Syria which gringo is intentionally ignoring.  ISIS was able to flourish in Syria because the World chose to let a dictator remain in power and this for him to he maintained power in select areas and ceding power to Islamic fundamentalists in another.  The World did nothing to establish a sane democratic government in Syria so now it is split among 2 different horrible regimes one of which is invading its neighbors.

I'm no fan of the Iraqi government but at least it is not a threat to their neighbors and not brutalizing its own people.   It failute to adequately defend its people from a foreign threat is the most serious criticism to level.

In Syria we have a religious civil war. 40% of Syrians back Assad they are all more or less non sunni muslim or Christian.

http://www.understandingwar.org/sites/default/files/PieChart13Dec.jpg

The pro Assad are a unity of minorities that don't want Sunni rule. I cant see how the world could have done anything, To go in and create a democracy and expect the emotions of hatred to just go away?

Democracy is fairly stable in Muslim countries when the population is predominantly one sect of Islam. for example and Tunisia, Lebanon, Turkey, Kuwait and Iran (to some degree) all have a predominante religion.

In Syria like with Iraq the Sunnis will vote for the Sunni candidiate and the Shia will vote for their Shia candidate more or less. Hopefully things will change.

Offline scipio_usmc

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9502
Re: Russia - worrying?
« Reply #176 on: March 09, 2015, 11:04:PM »
Everybody knows that the US and UK governments lied to go to war. To misrepresent this as intelligence failures is mendacious. The number of intelligence agents who have spoken since and at the time make it quite clear that the politicians deliberately exaggerated the intelligence. They asked for intelligence that would justify war. Any following of these events at the time made clear that the US was pushing for war at the UN. It wasn't other countries that had hundreds of thousands of troops massed ready to invade and bomb Iraq before war had supposedly been decided upon.
     Were the US military there just in case? or do you think that they were going to war whatever the world thought? The US were wrong to invade Iraq and this is not even disputed by anyone informed.
    To claim that the Russians are the aggressors on the world stage is ignoring the evidence in front of you.
    You are self evidently a war apologist and your understanding of the Ukraine conflict has clearly been fed to you by the US State Dept. You may be stupid enough to believe in US exceptionalism but the rest of us see the US as world bullies. The reason that they can act in this way on the world stage is because there are enough gullible, brainwashed and half informed voters to allow it. You are obviously among their number.
    Your attacks are so ridiculous that you have to put words into my mouth by claiming that I am an ISIS apologist. The wars that you support created ISIS. Without the Iraq invasion, the bombing of Libya and the US funding of Islamist rebels in Syria ISIS would not even exist. US interventions cause far more harm than good and the evidence for this is all around.
     Regarding the polls, I put forward to you a number of facts which you have just ignored. I know that it is because those truths are uncomfortable for you and that you have no reply so you just fall back on your usual tactic when faced with uncomfortable truths by resorting to ad hom attacks and calling people liars. Tell me where I lied about the polls. The ones you posted were carried out by demonstrably biased parties and if you dispute my findings then do so with your own evidence to refute what I said. If you cannot do so don't worry you can just call me a liar without actually bothering to point out any lies.
     I may have little credibility with you but that is to be expected with someone like you and I would have more cause to be concerned if you regarded me credible. Your arrogance in believing that you are the final word on each and every subject is staggering to behold, especially from someone so ill informed. 
     I watched Fox News last night for an hour or so(I know!!) and the bias and hysteria is a sight to behold and then it occurred to me that it was like listening to the News by Scip :o :o.
    The views on Iran and the Middle East in general are so lacking in balance and nuance that they are beyond satire.
    Your views are Iraq, Iran, Russia etc. are shared by a small minority of the world and most of those are American Republican supporters. The rest of the world view the US as the number 1 threat to world peace.
    Do yourself a favour and do a search on " biggest threat to world peace poll" if you disbelieve me or think I am lying. I did that search and lots of polls came up and they were consistent in their findings. There are lots to choose from and the polling took place over lots of countries.
     Who do you think the world views as the biggest threat then Scip? Could it be Russia or perhaps Iran?
     Funnily enough they were not even close so you have much work to do. The biggest threat by a considerable margin was the US so it appears that the world is full of people with little credibility who are biased and dishonest. Either that or horror of horrors you are a self aggrandising half informed war apologist. Even in America the US tied for third place with North Korea as biggest threat to world peace.
     Your on the wrong side of the argument scip, but that's nothing new to you :o
   


You are incapable of telling the truth about anything it is hilarious.

The intelligence officials confirm that the intelligence consensus was Iraq still had WMD programs.  You can't produce evidence to the contrary because you are full of crap.

The US military was in Saudi Arabia for years to defend it from Iraq and enforce the no fly zones that were imposed as a result of Iraq's aggression.  The US and UK militaries deployed in force after it became clear Iraq would never fully comply with its obligations. It was even selling oil on the black market to fund military projects that were thought to be WMD related.

You no doubt are one of the same clowns who insisted the US and Uk were doing this to steal Iraq's oil.  What did the US and UK get out of the war?  Why would they lie what benefit was there in war?  The only benefit of getting rid of Saddam was getting rid of a dictator who was a threat to his neighbors.  There was nothing else in it for the US and UK.  The motivation they gave is the motivation they had- to get rid of a threat who they thought had WMDs that's it.

The US didn't fund ISIS this is just another of your pathetic lies.  Everything you post is the complete opposite of reality which is why you praise Russian aggression of stealing lands because they want the ports.

You are like the Soviet propagandists who would trash the West and Capitalism.  It is all complete BS, you know it but don't care about the truth. 

Politeness is organized indifference- Paul Valéry

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13795
Re: Russia - worrying?
« Reply #177 on: March 09, 2015, 11:16:PM »

You are incapable of telling the truth about anything it is hilarious.

The intelligence officials confirm that the intelligence consensus was Iraq still had WMD programs.  You can't produce evidence to the contrary because you are full of crap.

The US military was in Saudi Arabia for years to defend it from Iraq and enforce the no fly zones that were imposed as a result of Iraq's aggression.  The US and UK militaries deployed in force after it became clear Iraq would never fully comply with its obligations. It was even selling oil on the black market to fund military projects that were thought to be WMD related.

You no doubt are one of the same clowns who insisted the US and Uk were doing this to steal Iraq's oil.  What did the US and UK get out of the war?  Why would they lie what benefit was there in war?  The only benefit of getting rid of Saddam was getting rid of a dictator who was a threat to his neighbors.  There was nothing else in it for the US and UK.  The motivation they gave is the motivation they had- to get rid of a threat who they thought had WMDs that's it.

The US didn't fund ISIS this is just another of your pathetic lies.  Everything you post is the complete opposite of reality which is why you praise Russian aggression of stealing lands because they want the ports.

You are like the Soviet propagandists who would trash the West and Capitalism.  It is all complete BS, you know it but don't care about the truth.

Scip check out what Gringo said when this thread began

Devastation caused and still being caused by those Western lies and propaganda should have woken everyone to the fact that we are the Nazis now.

And he has the audacity the call us ill informed lol

Offline gringo

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3414
Re: Russia - worrying?
« Reply #178 on: March 09, 2015, 11:19:PM »
The Iraqi army was responsible for state security and it failed. Half the Iraqi army joined ISIS the other half ran away like cowards.

As for WMD how about a former Iraqi airforce general is that a reliable enough source for you?

http://youtu.be/nrSl30UIPRs?t=10s
  I can't believe your still here and can only assume that you don't read the posts. You were shown to be out of your depth long ago.
     The Iraqi Army was disbanded by the Coalition Provisional Authority. There is lots of information on this and it is described as a blunder even by the US's own intelligence assessments. A new army was formed from scratch by the Paul Bremer who had supreme authority of the CPA. The new army was armed and trained by the US. These decisions were taken against the advice of the US military and CIA chief.
     The Iraqi army formed, armed and trained by the US turned out to be not very good and to have loyalties that differed from the US. Who could possibly have predicted that? Well apart from anyone informed and all of the intelligence assessments, military and CIA advice of the time.
     To be honest I couldn't be arsed watching your latest supposed evidence of Iraqi WMD, largely because I know that it will not be evidence. There were no WMD, the world knows that now. The weapons inspectors at the time said there were no WMD, weapons inspectors and intelligence agents have spoken of the distortions of the politicians to present conjecture as hard fact and misrepresent the intelligence to push for war.
    Millions around the world marched against war for the reasons that are becoming apparent now. All of this turmoil was predictable and predicted by many. The supporters of war denied that turmoil would be unleashed and now blame others for it. Stop embarrassing yourself and go and have a read up

Offline gringo

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3414
Re: Russia - worrying?
« Reply #179 on: March 09, 2015, 11:29:PM »

You are incapable of telling the truth about anything it is hilarious.

The intelligence officials confirm that the intelligence consensus was Iraq still had WMD programs.  You can't produce evidence to the contrary because you are full of crap.

The US military was in Saudi Arabia for years to defend it from Iraq and enforce the no fly zones that were imposed as a result of Iraq's aggression.  The US and UK militaries deployed in force after it became clear Iraq would never fully comply with its obligations. It was even selling oil on the black market to fund military projects that were thought to be WMD related.

You no doubt are one of the same clowns who insisted the US and Uk were doing this to steal Iraq's oil.  What did the US and UK get out of the war?  Why would they lie what benefit was there in war?  The only benefit of getting rid of Saddam was getting rid of a dictator who was a threat to his neighbors.  There was nothing else in it for the US and UK.  The motivation they gave is the motivation they had- to get rid of a threat who they thought had WMDs that's it.

The US didn't fund ISIS this is just another of your pathetic lies.  Everything you post is the complete opposite of reality which is why you praise Russian aggression of stealing lands because they want the ports.

You are like the Soviet propagandists who would trash the West and Capitalism.  It is all complete BS, you know it but don't care about the truth.
  Funny that the rest of the world doesn't see things your way. You have convinced no-one that the US have good intentions. More and more people are waking to the fact that the US is a threat to the world. Your lies are falling on deaf ears.