Scip why make up such nonsense? That is the third time this week you have made blatantly false claims about the moderator. If you want to convince people of Jeremy's guilt making stuff up is not going to do you any favours
Third time? Your accusations fell apart completely with respect to both of your prior allegations and fail now as well. Just as I stated Fletcher testified that the only way for blood to get in the moderator was via drawback or intentional planting not accidental contamination. The blood was distributed in the moderator as I suggested. I noted correctly the removal of the visible blood by the lab and microscopic blood by the defense expert. You made the ludicrous suggestion that Lincoln stated the blood he found was transferred by the lab as they swabbed it when he clearly suggested the blood he found is what they missed while swabbing it. The one not doing himself any favors is you in continuing to pretend I was wrong.
I didn't make up anything with respect to the DNA either. There were enough markers to know Sheila's DNA was found in 5 of the samples. The Court of Appeals was willing to spot the defense on the issue because it made no difference whether it was Sheila's or not since the DNA wasn't blood based and thus the Court accepted the defense claim that maybe it was Sheila's maybe it wasn't and then proceeded to say even if the defense claims are taken as true it proves nothing and doesn't refute the evidence used at trial.
There were 10 areas of the moderator tested the baffles in 3 different batches labeled A, B and C and then 7 other areas.
"Since the CCRC referred this case to the court, further DNA testing has taken place of other parts of the moderator. Seven swabbings have been taken from internal parts of the moderator apart from the baffles. All seven results indicated that DNA from more than one person was present. The results were complex and incomplete and it was not possible to determine how many people had contributed to the DNA from the mixture. The predominant contribution appeared to have come from a female or females.
When comparisons were possible, components matching Sheila Caffell's DNA profile were detected in five of these seven results. The other two results also contained components which matched those of Sheila Caffell, but not at all of the ten areas of DNA tested where information was available for comparison. Some of the components detected did not match the profile of Sheila Caffell
or the Caffell twins."
http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2002/2912.htmlNote "or the Caffell twins which was the court's way of indicating it was being suggested that the DNA that didn't match Sheila's completely was from one or both of the twins. Sheila and one or both of the twins were the major contributors in all 7 samples. There was at least 1 minor contributor in each of these 7 samples but no way to tell if the minor contributor in each sample was the same person or a different person.
