Author Topic: submit questions for the Essex Police Challenge  (Read 37929 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline maggie

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13651
Re: submit questions for the Essex Police Challenge
« Reply #480 on: March 11, 2015, 10:32:PM »
Inadvertently,  that's a good point.

In addition to the phone call, leaving the house apparently secure, also made the prospect of anybody else other than Jeremy or Sheila being responsible.
Badly thought out imo.

Offline gringo

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3414
Re: submit questions for the Essex Police Challenge
« Reply #481 on: March 11, 2015, 10:33:PM »
Not inentionally,  other than it looked like an argument was about to escalate.

I was just trying to bring the discussions back down again.

My apologies if you've taken offence.   :-[
   No offence taken, thanks for clarifying and no need to apologise :)

guest2181

  • Guest
Re: submit questions for the Essex Police Challenge
« Reply #482 on: March 11, 2015, 10:33:PM »
Badly thought out imo.

Yes, but I guess hindsight is a wonderful thing.  :-\

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13781
Re: submit questions for the Essex Police Challenge
« Reply #483 on: March 11, 2015, 10:35:PM »
Julie said he considered this. But there were valuable items which had been under insured. Someone might spot the fire and it may get stopped before the evidence has been destroyed. It was a big house and would be hard to burn down.

Ah Julie said  ::)

Offline maggie

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13651
Re: submit questions for the Essex Police Challenge
« Reply #484 on: March 11, 2015, 10:37:PM »
Yes, but I guess hindsight is a wonderful thing.  :-\
If he worked on it for a year it was a bit shoddy imo  ;)

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Re: submit questions for the Essex Police Challenge
« Reply #485 on: March 11, 2015, 10:37:PM »
Hey gringo when Adam appears he will start a thread ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D  Patti's Percentages.  What a hoot ;D

Sounds naughty!

Offline maggie

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13651
Re: submit questions for the Essex Police Challenge
« Reply #486 on: March 11, 2015, 10:38:PM »
Sounds naughty!
;D ;D ;D ;D ;D London Girl  ;D ;D

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13781
Re: submit questions for the Essex Police Challenge
« Reply #487 on: March 11, 2015, 10:38:PM »
If he worked on it for a year it was a bit shoddy imo  ;)

He may not have even done anything  :(

guest2181

  • Guest
Re: submit questions for the Essex Police Challenge
« Reply #488 on: March 11, 2015, 10:44:PM »
He may not have even done anything  :(

Maybe, but the evidence does suggest otherwise,  well more than suggest 'in my opinion'.

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13781
Re: submit questions for the Essex Police Challenge
« Reply #489 on: March 11, 2015, 10:47:PM »
Maybe, but the evidence does suggest otherwise,  well more than suggest 'in my opinion'.

How much can you trust the evidence thou. Do you believe there could be foul play involved with the silencer?

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44381
Re: submit questions for the Essex Police Challenge
« Reply #490 on: March 11, 2015, 10:49:PM »
Ah Julie said  ::)

Well WHF was nof burnt down.

It would be strange that Jeremy would kill his parents for inheritance, but burn down a big, magnificent house.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44381
Re: submit questions for the Essex Police Challenge
« Reply #491 on: March 11, 2015, 10:51:PM »
Jeremy did speak to a friend about burning down WHF, prior to the massacre. Saying if everyone died, everything would be his.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

guest2181

  • Guest
Re: submit questions for the Essex Police Challenge
« Reply #492 on: March 11, 2015, 11:05:PM »
How much can you trust the evidence thou. Do you believe there could be foul play involved with the silencer?

Well I knew nothing at all about the case, I was told 'what the situation was' by others, I set out to find out for myself and form my own opinion. I've been on this forum on and off almost since it's inception, arguably I know the case as well as anybody.

I've formed the opinion that I have regarding JB's guilt, based on my take on the information available.

I don't believe there was foul play of any kind regarding the sound moderator. There have been many claims made about the SM, from exhibit references, multiple SM's, the find date etc, etc. Every single claim has been found out to be a concoction.
The claims may sound compelling at first, but when you actually delve in to them, you can see that they are fantastical. It's not just a case of misunderstanding either, they are outright lies attempting to pull the wool over people's eyes. They are obviously not given any mileage, other than on these types of message boards.

That's where I am anyway.

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Re: submit questions for the Essex Police Challenge
« Reply #493 on: March 11, 2015, 11:18:PM »
Inadvertently,  that's a good point.

In addition to the phone call, leaving the house apparently secure, also made the prospect of anybody else other than Jeremy or Sheila being responsible.

Inavertently!  :'( That was me, so if I make a good point, it is per definition inadvertently.

Of course it was a good point - advertently. What super-idiot shoots someone twice, then proceeds to stage it as a suicide, crawls out a window, locks it from outside (never heard of such a thing anywhere else, but never mind, it didn´t have to be proven.....), then calls the cops with a made up claim about a phone call, which excludes anyone else but you or the victim you shot twice and staged as a suicide - what massive moron would do that?
In fact i made a brilliant point, if I may say so myself!

guest2181

  • Guest
Re: submit questions for the Essex Police Challenge
« Reply #494 on: March 11, 2015, 11:19:PM »
Inavertently!  :'( That was me, so if I make a good point, it is per definition inadvertently.

Of course it was a good point - advertently. What super-idiot shoots someone twice, then proceeds to stage it as a suicide, crawls out a window, locks it from outside (never heard of such a thing anywhere else, but never mind, it didn´t have to be proven.....), then calls the cops with a made up claim about a phone call, which excludes anyone else but you or the victim you shot twice and staged as a suicide - what massive moron would do that?
In fact i made a brilliant point, if I may say so myself!

Well Done Alias.  :D