I am not making any assumptions Patti stated the following:
I didn't make any assumptions, Patti was crystal clear.
Patti has never dealt with the issues I raised which establish the call was not reasonably likely to have occurred. Nor has any other Jeremy supporter despite being challenged to do so time and again.
Patti chooses to ignore such and just pretend there is no evidence that tells us whether the call happened or didn't and thus there is reasonable doubt over his guilt. It amounts to creating the fiction the call was possible to create the fiction there is reasonable doubt.
Why should I deal with anything that you raise? It takes me half the night to digest what you have posted. However, I do take on board some of the things you post and I quite agree with them.
The problem I have is being told by you that I am biased and do not demonstrate anything. Well, I have come to the decision that I am going to speak to you as you speak to me.
You twist and turn everything I say, to suit you and your glamorized beliefs because you cannot come to terms with anything that anyone puts too you. If I was to say the black is black you would write an epilogue saying it is not so.
I have said what I said about the phone call and it has gotten so twisted its enough to make me take the duster and polish the polished table. I am not going to continue to repeat myself either.
Contradiction. I am biased because I believe that there is no evidence to prove one way or the other that telephone from Nevill to Jeremy existed.... I wont shift on that opinion either, is that OK?
