submit questions for the Essex Police Challenge

[John]

How is anyone supposed to produce any evidence at all when they're innocent ? It's impossible !

Not impossible, just difficult sometimes.

[Jane]

Because it sounds good, it's an argument that can be hidden behind because there is no answer to it.

Evidence HIDDEN under PII.
NEW promising evidence.
A phonecall from Ralph.
Itemised billing.
NEW evidence about Sheila's past medical history.

It all SOUNDS good. It brings supporters aboard because it sounds promising and surely HAS to be true! But it's fallen apart time and again. It says a lot when the arguements REPEATEDLY used by supporters and the campaign team - aren't even in the Bamber legal appeals.... I find that mind blowing & very, very telling.

To my eternal embarrassment, I was drawn in by the promise of seeing a picture of Sheila on the bed with one bullet wound, permission for which, along with several other things, being mysteriously withdrawn at the 11th hour HOWEVER, I have to take some responsibility for believing it. At the time, I WANTED it to be true.

[Caroline]

How is anyone supposed to produce any evidence at all when they're innocent ? It's impossible !

How did other MOJ gain their freedom? It's only impossible if there is no evidence because you're guilty. Jeremy stitched himself up with the phone call - no getting away from that.

[guest154]

To my eternal embarrassment, I was drawn in by the promise of seeing a picture of Sheila on the bed with one bullet wound, permission for which, along with several other things, being mysteriously withdrawn at the 11th hour

I dont think you should be embarsessed. Not to put words into your head but you must of been thinking "It HAS to be true because WHY would anyone make it up." which i think is a perfectly normal belief to have, Apes.

[Caroline]

I dont think you should be embarsessed. Not to put words into your head but you must of been thinking "It HAS to be true because WHY would anyone make it up." which i think is a perfectly normal belief to have, Apes.

I got drawn in too but once bitten .....

[Jane]

I dont think you should be embarsessed. Not to put words into your head but you must of been thinking "It HAS to be true because WHY would anyone make it up." which i think is a perfectly normal belief to have, Apes.

Aww Mat That's EXACTLY how it was.

[guest154]

I got drawn in too but once bitten .....

I believed the story of sheila running from the monastry 

[Jane]

I got drawn in too but once bitten .....

...........off came the rose tinteds, eh?

[lookout]

You will find that every claimed miscarriage of justice case contains anomalies of some sort where the evidence and facts do not match up exactly with the Crown's case.

In this case however there are no such anomalies, the evidence of which there is oodles matches the 'Jeremy did it' theory perfectly.

Even Mike Tesko has never once been able to produce the slightest evidence that Jeremy is innocent of the five murders and that alone tells its own story.

How is anyone supposed to produce any evidence at all when they're innocent ? It's impossible !

[Caroline]

...........off came the rose tinteds, eh?

Certainly did - they're grey now!

[Jane]

I believed the story of sheila running from the monastry 

Mat, I clung to that one for YONKS, even looking at it differently when I visited!!! There is NOTHING there to support such wild AND FALSE allegations. I think a HUGE disservice has been done them.

[Caroline]

How is anyone supposed to produce any evidence at all when they're innocent ? It's impossible !

I thought yu said Jeremy had new evidence? 

[lookout]

As a matter of interest,I take it that you're all 100% sure of Jeremy's guilt ? Yes ?

[Caroline]

I believed the story of sheila running from the monastry 

I didn't fall for that one! Only because there was never any reference to it in any docs.

[Caroline]

As a matter of interest,I take it that you're all 100% sure of Jeremy's guilt ? Yes ?

Can't say 100% but near as damned it!