That's a bit of a stupid thing to assert
"Colin Caffell (her ex-husband) said that although there had been violent outbursts by Sheila during their time together, this had involved the throwing of
pots and pans and the occasional striking of him. To his knowledge she had never harmed the children or behaved violently towards anybody else."
http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2002/2912.htmlWomen do indeed turn to pots and pans for defense and a female lawyer I work with constantly says she would use a frying pan as her weapon of choice if someone broke into her house because how heavy it is and thus the damage it can do. Is she sexist?
This is from a website discussing cleaning pots and pans:
"Also, pots and pans make viable weapons against intruders, though once you're done exercising your right to protect your home, you may just want to throw the pot and/or pan away. Blood is much harder to clean than grease, and frankly, who knows where that thieving ne'er-do-well has been? Be safe: Blood is a biohazard."
Alias won't even admit female nails break plenty and insists Sheila's nails would not have broken during the struggle so naturally she will ignore the issue of Sheila's weapon of choice being something other than a gun.