Author Topic: Bambers Application for Prerogative of Pardon 2005  (Read 20114 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: Bambers Application for Prerogative of Pardon 2005
« Reply #390 on: February 27, 2015, 07:45:PM »
what sort of stupid sexist comment is that skippy?

you obviously have spent your life with the wrong women.

in this country now women are just as likely to use weapons unfortunately.

but this was not just a "domestic" this was murder by a desperate person. And everyone knew where the weapons were kept.Dont forget Sheila thought the cia were after her . So frying pans would have been inadequate ::)

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Re: Bambers Application for Prerogative of Pardon 2005
« Reply #391 on: February 27, 2015, 07:48:PM »
what sort of stupid sexist comment is that skippy?

you obviously have spent your life with the wrong women.

in this country now women are just as likely to use weapons unfortunately.

but this was not just a "domestic" this was murder by a desperate person. And everyone knew where the weapons were kept.Dont forget Sheila thought the cia were after her . So frying pans would have been inadequate ::)

A frying pan? Really?   ::)

Oh, of course, women are always in the kitchen where they belong. Silly me.
« Last Edit: February 27, 2015, 07:49:PM by Alias »

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: Bambers Application for Prerogative of Pardon 2005
« Reply #392 on: February 27, 2015, 07:53:PM »
If he was going to think up the complicated scenario that he did to cover the murder you think he would have got the details right ::) All that planning and then to get the story about the rabbits wrong?

I just don't think he thought it mattered . He never thought he would be a suspect . He never thought to sit down and think about everything in detail . If he was innocent , despite what people have said he would have been in shock. Not like others writing everything down on cards.

It was not until Sept that he found out everything he did on that night would be scrutinised .

.

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13786
Re: Bambers Application for Prerogative of Pardon 2005
« Reply #393 on: February 27, 2015, 07:56:PM »
"It doesn't matter that the cupboard didn't have a lock.  The issue is that Sheila had no interest in guns and would not have gone to the cupboard to get the weapon.  The weapon of choice of women during an argument is a frying pan" - Skippy


Case closed!


 ::)

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Re: Bambers Application for Prerogative of Pardon 2005
« Reply #394 on: February 27, 2015, 07:58:PM »
"It doesn't matter that the cupboard didn't have a lock.  The issue is that Sheila had no interest in guns and would not have gone to the cupboard to get the weapon.  The weapon of choice of women during an argument is a frying pan" - Skippy


Case closed!


 ::)

You can learn a lot from his posts - about HIM!  ;)

Offline maggie

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13651
Re: Bambers Application for Prerogative of Pardon 2005
« Reply #395 on: February 27, 2015, 08:04:PM »
A frying pan? Really?   ::)

Oh, of course, women are always in the kitchen where they belong. Silly me.
;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Bambers Application for Prerogative of Pardon 2005
« Reply #396 on: February 27, 2015, 08:07:PM »
According to the Boutflours,there was nothing wrong with Sheila.There was no talk of fostering as Aunty June wouldn't have allowed it to happen.Sheila didn't take drugs. Jeremy had told lies about the fostering.The Boutflours had told police that what Jeremy had told them was all lies.
So shall we all agree with them ? Shall we believe them ?

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Re: Bambers Application for Prerogative of Pardon 2005
« Reply #397 on: February 27, 2015, 08:07:PM »
;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Yes, Maggie, isn´t that what we do? Don´t we always lurk out there in the kitchen with frying pans in our dish-wash-water soaked marigolds, ready to charge?  ;D

Offline maggie

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13651
Re: Bambers Application for Prerogative of Pardon 2005
« Reply #398 on: February 27, 2015, 08:09:PM »
Yes, Maggie, isn´t that what we do? Don´t we always lurk out there in the kitchen with frying pans in our dish-wash-water soaked marigolds, ready to charge?  ;D
That's what I do Alias, am tied to the kitchen sink at all times  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: Bambers Application for Prerogative of Pardon 2005
« Reply #399 on: February 27, 2015, 08:15:PM »
I could think of some situations on here where a frying pan would be useful.

MCP come to mind

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44411
Re: Bambers Application for Prerogative of Pardon 2005
« Reply #400 on: February 27, 2015, 08:18:PM »
According to the Boutflours,there was nothing wrong with Sheila.There was no talk of fostering as Aunty June wouldn't have allowed it to happen.Sheila didn't take drugs. Jeremy had told lies about the fostering.The Boutflours had told police that what Jeremy had told them was all lies.
So shall we all agree with them ? Shall we believe them ?

AE said Sheila had trouble putting sugar in coffee.

RB said Sheila had to hold a glass with two hands.

It's in their WS's.

Re load, twice. Mmm.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13786
Re: Bambers Application for Prerogative of Pardon 2005
« Reply #401 on: February 27, 2015, 08:24:PM »
AE said Sheila had trouble putting sugar in coffee.

RB said Sheila had to hold a glass with two hands.

It's in their WS's.

Re load, twice. Mmm.

I believe they had not seen her for the last 8 month of her life?

She seemed to be able to dress and do her hair ect

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44411
Re: Bambers Application for Prerogative of Pardon 2005
« Reply #402 on: February 27, 2015, 08:27:PM »
I believe they had not seen her for the last 8 month of her life?

She seemed to be able to dress and do her hair ect

Have you got a source for this please.

So she went through quite a transformation then. Unable to put sugar in tea to a crazy superwoman.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Bambers Application for Prerogative of Pardon 2005
« Reply #403 on: February 27, 2015, 08:28:PM »
I believe they had not seen her for the last 8 month of her life?

She seemed to be able to dress and do her hair ect





But they KNEW her better than anyone.Whether they'd seen her or not.

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13786
Re: Bambers Application for Prerogative of Pardon 2005
« Reply #404 on: February 27, 2015, 08:49:PM »




But they KNEW her better than anyone.Whether they'd seen her or not.

I would say except for June and Neville the doctors that dealt with her with her would no better than anyone. since they have to be very observant and do go by rumors or gossip. Thats my opinion anyway