Author Topic: Bambers Application for Prerogative of Pardon 2005  (Read 20163 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline scipio_usmc

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9502
Re: Bambers Application for Prerogative of Pardon 2005
« Reply #240 on: February 26, 2015, 05:45:PM »

Sorry, but there's no way I can put the accusation of a female "whining like a baby" in the same degree of foulness as calling a female a F&^$£^g  B)(*h.

For the record I accuse men and women alike of whining, gender has no bearing on it.  I guess in a way he is gender neutral as well because he cussed out Caroline just like he did to males previously.

If he called a woman the B word I missed it.     
Politeness is organized indifference- Paul Valéry

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Bambers Application for Prerogative of Pardon 2005
« Reply #241 on: February 26, 2015, 05:47:PM »
There were rumors he was a mercenary because he had done contracting work overseas. Whether Jeremy believed those rumors himself who knows but he took advantage of them and the rumors were sufficient for Julie to believe MM could take a job as a hitman.




That's what I said--------------a fantasist.  ::) He felt big.Safety in numbers. I call them cowards meself.

Mr. Gee

  • Guest
Re: Bambers Application for Prerogative of Pardon 2005
« Reply #242 on: February 26, 2015, 05:59:PM »
For the record I accuse men and women alike of whining, gender has no bearing on it.  I guess in a way he is gender neutral as well because he cussed out Caroline just like he did to males previously.

If he called a woman the B word I missed it.   
Go ahead justify yourself. As usual. Be a man for a change and stand by your mistake. I have. I have used abusive words towards a woman and regret it. But what is done is done. I ask no forgiveness. I've just got to dear my mistakes. Go on you know you really yern to become a man.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Bambers Application for Prerogative of Pardon 2005
« Reply #243 on: February 26, 2015, 07:35:PM »
Wasn´t MM a plumber? Hardly a "professional hitman".

Huh? I'm not saying he WAS a professional hit man - but they THOUGHT he was!
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Re: Bambers Application for Prerogative of Pardon 2005
« Reply #244 on: February 26, 2015, 07:37:PM »
Huh? I'm not saying he WAS a professional hit man - but they THOUGHT he was!

I´m not deaf.

Mr. Gee

  • Guest
Re: Bambers Application for Prerogative of Pardon 2005
« Reply #245 on: February 26, 2015, 07:48:PM »
Haha he was a professional hit man. He got his victims to put one end of a copper pipe to their ear and then he blew through the other end. ;D

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: Bambers Application for Prerogative of Pardon 2005
« Reply #246 on: February 26, 2015, 07:58:PM »
The MM thing is actually quite interesting - I don't really think we have got to the bottom of why he came into the picture. The police seemed to think  it was viable that a hit man was involved - and IMO I don't think it came from JB . So did they say to JM - we think someone did make a call - we think JB used someone else in the house - do you have anyone he might know who would be up to the job?

They took it quite seriously  with all the statements /finger printing / blood tests etc.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Bambers Application for Prerogative of Pardon 2005
« Reply #247 on: February 26, 2015, 07:59:PM »
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Bambers Application for Prerogative of Pardon 2005
« Reply #248 on: February 26, 2015, 08:23:PM »
The MM thing is actually quite interesting - I don't really think we have got to the bottom of why he came into the picture. The police seemed to think  it was viable that a hit man was involved - and IMO I don't think it came from JB . So did they say to JM - we think someone did make a call - we think JB used someone else in the house - do you have anyone he might know who would be up to the job?

They took it quite seriously  with all the statements /finger printing / blood tests etc.





MM knew the inside of WHF because he used to visit on a formal capacity as well as a working one ??
 The Bambers thought he was " a nice man " ?? They obviously had no idea of his pedigree  ::) Who are we to know that his alibi was sound ? He could have got his girlfriend to spin a tale.
And why didn't he sue for wrongful arrest ?

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Bambers Application for Prerogative of Pardon 2005
« Reply #249 on: February 26, 2015, 08:28:PM »




MM knew the inside of WHF because he used to visit on a formal capacity as well as a working one ??
 The Bambers thought he was " a nice man " ?? They obviously had no idea of his pedigree  ::) Who are we to know that his alibi was sound ? He could have got his girlfriend to spin a tale.
And why didn't he sue for wrongful arrest ?

Basically Lookout if you're saying MM was responsible - you're also saying Jeremy is guilty!!
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Bambers Application for Prerogative of Pardon 2005
« Reply #250 on: February 26, 2015, 08:33:PM »
The MM thing is actually quite interesting - I don't really think we have got to the bottom of why he came into the picture. The police seemed to think  it was viable that a hit man was involved - and IMO I don't think it came from JB . So did they say to JM - we think someone did make a call - we think JB used someone else in the house - do you have anyone he might know who would be up to the job?

They took it quite seriously  with all the statements /finger printing / blood tests etc.

They have to take any accusation seriously.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Bambers Application for Prerogative of Pardon 2005
« Reply #251 on: February 26, 2015, 08:41:PM »
Basically Lookout if you're saying MM was responsible - you're also saying Jeremy is guilty!!




But I am NOT saying that MM was responsible. I got the expected reaction though. ;D ;D ;D ;D

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Re: Bambers Application for Prerogative of Pardon 2005
« Reply #252 on: February 26, 2015, 08:43:PM »
How could anybody believe that the local plumber was a professional hitman?

Offline maggie

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13651
Re: Bambers Application for Prerogative of Pardon 2005
« Reply #253 on: February 26, 2015, 08:45:PM »
How could anybody believe that the local plumber was a professional hitman?
Think he'd worked out in Libya?  and encouraged the rumours that he was a mercenary. ;D  in fact he was working on building sites.  He's lucky he didn't find himself in the cell next to Jeremy,  there's a moral there somewhere  ;) ;)

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Bambers Application for Prerogative of Pardon 2005
« Reply #254 on: February 26, 2015, 08:46:PM »
Just as if.The man didn't look as though he could punch his way out of a wet paper bag let alone slaughter a whole family.

I've said time and time again that anyone who can do that is as mad as a hatter--------totally insane.