I've seen this before and was left with did he or didn't he.
Like the Bamber case the most important evidence is either missing or has been destroyed.
The house where the little girl lived looked off track to me, so it has to be someone who knew her in my opinion. Shame on the mother for leaving her at 12 years old to look after a baby, but on saying that times were hard then and there was no childcare as we have today. So maybe saying shame on the mother is not a fair thing to say.
The government here says that when a child reaches 10 years old the mother has to find work unless she has children under the age of 10. I think this is an enforcement to be honest one that can only lead to children being left to fend for themselves in a world where there is such violence and child abuse.
He lost his appeal in 2014 or the judge rejected his application. He is adamant that he did not kill her, but what on earth was he doing in the woods? Shooting up in not a very good excuse. How can the items from his car which was found on the drive of her home be explained? other than the items were planted which is suggested by one ex copper. The other thing is the scarf and rope, how can that be explained unless again these items were planted, which is unlikely....
The other bloke that was named as being a suspect...why don't the authorities get a DNA sample? its as easy as that, but they fail to do the obvious.
Fair trial I don't think he got one....tbh....
