« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]   Go Down

Author Topic: From Julie Mugford's statements to her 'compelling evidence'  (Read 9677 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

sandy

  • Guest
Re: From Julie Mugford's statements to her 'compelling evidence'
« Reply #45 on: April 22, 2011, 08:57:PM »
I mean they no longer exist just like the transcript of Jeremy's evidence in chief.
Logged

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6961
Re: From Julie Mugford's statements to her 'compelling evidence'
« Reply #46 on: April 22, 2011, 09:03:PM »
Quote from: sandy on April 22, 2011, 08:57:PM
I mean they no longer exist just like the transcript of Jeremy's evidence in chief.

OK. I don't know why they would have been destroyed though.
Logged

sandy

  • Guest
Re: From Julie Mugford's statements to her 'compelling evidence'
« Reply #47 on: April 22, 2011, 09:05:PM »
or lost maybe??
Logged

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6961
Re: From Julie Mugford's statements to her 'compelling evidence'
« Reply #48 on: April 22, 2011, 09:11:PM »
Quote from: sandy on April 22, 2011, 09:05:PM
or lost maybe??

Maybe. Shame really as I would like to have seen those.
Logged

sandy

  • Guest
Re: From Julie Mugford's statements to her 'compelling evidence'
« Reply #49 on: April 25, 2011, 01:37:AM »
Quote from: Rochford Shields on April 21, 2011, 05:24:PM
The reason why I used 'compelling' in this thread was because I have read on several occasions that people who were in court found her testimony compelling.  No response from Mike about the statements prior to the trial so it looks like he can't post them.

Her evidence was compelling and extremely to the point.  Even the maestro himself couldn't trip her up.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]   Go Up
« previous next »