Author Topic: From Julie Mugford's statements to her 'compelling evidence'  (Read 9690 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

sandy

  • Guest
Re: From Julie Mugford's statements to her 'compelling evidence'
« Reply #30 on: April 22, 2011, 05:02:PM »
I bet it haunts Colin as well the sight of two faced lieing mugford standing next to him at the funeral

I would love to know what Colin would feel like if her met her now especially knowing about her blood money


Sandy what do you thinks Colin feels about mugford and the fact she made money out of talking about his dead children

Do you think Colin would give her full marks Sandy

Keep coming out with rubbish like that the Wanker label will stick

You sound almost proud of her like a proud mother or father

Colin has every right to hate Mugford since if she had spoken to the authorities soon the whole thing would have been prevented and Jeremy would now be a free man.

Jackiepreece

  • Guest
Re: From Julie Mugford's statements to her 'compelling evidence'
« Reply #31 on: April 22, 2011, 05:15:PM »
First of all anything that I was told in confidence i would not repeat unless I was told it was ok

You might get a little teaser like you get for a movie or I might decide to share it by private message to people I trust

The relationship I have with Jeremy is about as good as it could get and I am 100% behind him

As for your stupid ridiculous comment full marks for speaking out

I take it you mean the news of the world

I am trying to think of a word to describe you

Oh that's it

Prick

chochokeira

  • Guest
Re: From Julie Mugford's statements to her 'compelling evidence'
« Reply #32 on: April 22, 2011, 05:19:PM »
It is the same old story, making comments without knowing the facts.  Sheila was taking medication for her condition which left her sedated. What would you do if a gun was pushed in your face hero??

Sheila would not have know anyone was dead, let alone her two sons.


I'm sure you're aware that Sheila had stopped taking her medication, sandy.

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6961
Re: From Julie Mugford's statements to her 'compelling evidence'
« Reply #33 on: April 22, 2011, 05:26:PM »
It is the same old story, making comments without knowing the facts.  Sheila was taking medication for her condition which left her sedated. What would you do if a gun was pushed in your face hero??

Sheila would not have know anyone was dead, let alone her two sons.


I'm sure you're aware that Sheila had stopped taking her medication, sandy.

Sheila didn't need to take haliperidol because she had injections. Her last last injection was on 11th July and it was half her usual dose. I think she had been prescribed other drugs earlier in the year, but I'm not sure if she was taking any of them. There was nothing found at the post mortem.

sandy

  • Guest
Re: From Julie Mugford's statements to her 'compelling evidence'
« Reply #34 on: April 22, 2011, 05:29:PM »
It is the same old story, making comments without knowing the facts.  Sheila was taking medication for her condition which left her sedated. What would you do if a gun was pushed in your face hero??

Sheila would not have know anyone was dead, let alone her two sons.


I'm sure you're aware that Sheila had stopped taking her medication, sandy.

Sheila didn't need to take haliperidol because she had injections. Her last last injection was on 11th July and it was half her usual dose. I think she had been prescribed other drugs earlier in the year, but I'm not sure if she was taking any of them. There was nothing found at the post mortem.

Sorry but it was detected in her bloodstream at post mortem.

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6961
Re: From Julie Mugford's statements to her 'compelling evidence'
« Reply #35 on: April 22, 2011, 05:32:PM »
It is the same old story, making comments without knowing the facts.  Sheila was taking medication for her condition which left her sedated. What would you do if a gun was pushed in your face hero??

Sheila would not have know anyone was dead, let alone her two sons.


I'm sure you're aware that Sheila had stopped taking her medication, sandy.

Sheila didn't need to take haliperidol because she had injections. Her last last injection was on 11th July and it was half her usual dose. I think she had been prescribed other drugs earlier in the year, but I'm not sure if she was taking any of them. There was nothing found at the post mortem.

Sorry but it was detected in her bloodstream at post mortem.

I meant the other drugs she'd been prescribed earlier that year. I know they found haloperidol and cannabis.
« Last Edit: April 22, 2011, 05:52:PM by Kaldin »

sandy

  • Guest
Re: From Julie Mugford's statements to her 'compelling evidence'
« Reply #36 on: April 22, 2011, 06:08:PM »
Ah so.

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6961

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?

sandy

  • Guest
« Last Edit: April 22, 2011, 06:43:PM by sandy »

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6961
Re: From Julie Mugford's statements to her 'compelling evidence'
« Reply #40 on: April 22, 2011, 07:56:PM »
By the way, here's Julie's statement to the police which she made on 8th August.

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=556.0;attach=1890;image

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=556.0;attach=1891;image

Interesting.

Do you have her final statements in which she opened up to the police?

No I don't I'm afraid. They may be around somewhere but I don't recall seeing them. I've seen a statement from her about the cheque book fraud and about her selling her story. Those are on Sleuthing for Justice, which is a private forum so you need to be a member to read it. Some of her statements might be on here - if you don't mind trawling through a lot of threads, or maybe Mike has them.

sandy

  • Guest
Re: From Julie Mugford's statements to her 'compelling evidence'
« Reply #41 on: April 22, 2011, 08:00:PM »
Why do you think her statements are so hard to find?   Could it be that they don't now exist in the same way that Jeremy's evidence in chief does not now apparently exist?

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6961
Re: From Julie Mugford's statements to her 'compelling evidence'
« Reply #42 on: April 22, 2011, 08:02:PM »
Why do you think her statements are so hard to find?   Could it be that they don't now exist in the same way that Jeremy's evidence in chief does not now apparently exist?

They may have been posted somewhere, I don't know. All I know is that I haven't seen them.

sandy

  • Guest
Re: From Julie Mugford's statements to her 'compelling evidence'
« Reply #43 on: April 22, 2011, 08:07:PM »
I think they don't exist and if they do I suspect mike doesn't have them.

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6961
Re: From Julie Mugford's statements to her 'compelling evidence'
« Reply #44 on: April 22, 2011, 08:07:PM »
I think they don't exist and if they do I suspect mike doesn't have them.

Do you mean the statements she gave when she shopped Jeremy? They must exist or there would have been no case.