Author Topic: Photographic still image taken from crime scene video - The shocking truth...  (Read 75388 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

John

  • Guest
I have seen it though, so it must have been on Youtube at some point - or what?

Possibly as that is where I took the stills from in Feb 2012.
« Last Edit: February 02, 2015, 06:24:PM by John »

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
I found it on you tube - true crimes- one pic is just before 3 min 44 secs -

also found this one which I had not watched before which show some tests with the gun.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_i2CjYDJGTo

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
I found it on you tube - true crimes- one pic is just before 3 min 44 secs -

also found this one which I had not watched before which show some tests with the gun.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_i2CjYDJGTo

Thanks Jan!  :)

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h4XDiAoafc  this is the one with the photo

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h4XDiAoafc  this is the one with the photo

The video doesn't exist Jan?
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
The video doesn't exist Jan?

I just watched it - perhaps I did not copy the whole link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h4XDiAoafck

search crimes that shook Britain- bamber - documentary version

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33776
I just watched it - perhaps I did not copy the whole link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h4XDiAoafck

search crimes that shook Britain- bamber - documentary version



Oh dear. Talk about licence and condensing!!! Got to the part where Bob Miller said Sheila had only been "out of hospital a few days"!!!!! and gave up. Will go back to it later.....................but thanks for the link, Jan.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
I just watched it - perhaps I did not copy the whole link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h4XDiAoafck

search crimes that shook Britain- bamber - documentary version

Thanks Jan but this is actually in the archives under 'Video's' http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,370.msg189919.html#msg189919
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Thanks Jan but this is actually in the archives under 'Video's' http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,370.msg189919.html#msg189919

just saying that is where one of the stills comes from.

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Jan thanks for the link I did get it did not know it was in the Archives.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
How amazing that these photographic still images are now being touted as fakes when both were broadcast as part of tv documentaries. Of course they are not fakes, but out of interest who faked them then? There is no truth to support such a false allegation. Provide the evidence to back up what is being alleged, or you will just have to accept that these photographic still images are genuine...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33776
How amazing that these photographic still images are now being touted as fakes when both were broadcast as part of tv documentaries. Of course they are not fakes, but out of interest who faked them then? There is no truth to support such a false allegation. Provide the evidence to back up what is being alleged, or you will just have to accept that these photographic still images are genuine...


Undoubtedly, unless they used dummies, and prosthetic departments are capable of producing truly life -or should that be DEATH- like likenesses, they're genuine pictures of someone.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Anyone who claims that photographic image (a) is not new material because its been shown before, or seen before, should explain to me  why no-one has brought up the issue of there  being  two female bodies in the image, not just one? Why would someone go to the trouble of fakung a photograph with two female bodies inIit close to each other, when the official police case is that Sheila and Junes bodies were found on a bedroom floor either side of a double bed - Sheila laid out flat on the floor alongside the  edge of the bed, whilst June was slumped against the bedroom door on the other side of the bed...

« Last Edit: February 03, 2015, 11:57:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline maggie

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13651
Both photographs are fake. Mike knows this.

More concerning is that NGB also knows this but always the charade to continue. Speaks volumes.
Hi Dodger I repeat ngb's request, would you please sign in via the forum with a short summary of your interest in the case.
Thank you  :)

Mr. Gee

  • Guest
How amazing that these photographic still images are now being touted as fakes when both were broadcast as part of tv documentaries. Of course they are not fakes, but out of interest who faked them then? There is no truth to support such a false allegation. Provide the evidence to back up what is being alleged, or you will just have to accept that these photographic still images are genuine...
And the last image also that they said was a fake when you first posted it they now say is a picture of Sheila in the morg. I can remember when many of the guilters where saying then that it was not genuine.