Photographic still image taken from crime scene video - The shocking truth...

[mike tesko]

There is a 50 / 50 chance, that the female in the foreground in one of the posted images is Sheila, but I am 100% satisfied that Sheila is the female in the other photographic still taken from video footage during the training exercise. The particular video tape containing this image was taken long after PC Bird photographed Sheila's body on the floor alongside the edge of the bed, at a time when she had already been shot on the second occasion. The following image is understood to have been filmed on the last tape taken at the scene before the training exercise was brought to a dramatic conclusion...

[mike tesko]

The following image is believed to have been taken at around 9am, and would have been part of the first video tape used in the training exercise:-

[mike tesko]

The following photograph showing two bullet wounds to Sheila's neck, and blood running from the corners of her mouth, etc, was taken by PC Bird at around 10 O'clock:-

[mike tesko]

How did Sheila's body end up on the floor parallel with the edge of the bed and the rifle and bible on or next to her, after being filmed elsewhere at the scene with the body of a second female in close attendance?

Similarly, how did June Bambers body end up becoming propped up against the bedroom door, after she was filmed laying on a floor at the scene close to Sheila's body?

[mike tesko]

Who took the video footage at the crime scene between 9am and 11.10am, during the training exercise being supervised by senior officers?

[mike tesko]

Who took the video footage at the crime scene between 9am and 11.10am, during the training exercise being supervised by senior officers?

Why hasn't anyone owned up to being responsible for producing all this key video footage?

[Caroline]

The reason for my absence from the forum recently involved meetings with people to try and determine whether or not the female in the foreground of one of the posted images, was / is Sheila, or not? Views have been expressed to the effect that the female in question is not Sheila, and that it is Sheila. If it is Sheila, then obviously she must have still been alive at the time the video footage was being taken, because as we have been told, it was the second shot which killed her (not the first one). How could Jeremy have killed his sister, if she was still alive inside the farmhouse and had not yet been shot fatally beneath the chin?

So, the picture of Sheila with two shots and blood trailing from her mouth, could NOT have been taken 'AFTER' the bloodied face picture, because unless someone washed her face after CPR and let the blood trail out of her mouth again - we're on a road to nowhere!

[Caroline]

So, the picture of Sheila with two shots and blood trailing from her mouth, could NOT have been taken 'AFTER' the bloodied face picture, because unless someone washed her face after CPR and let the blood trail our of her mouth again - we're on a road to nowhere!

At no point do these images show - one shot!

[mike tesko]

At no point do these images show - one shot!

If  you are correct, then either Sheila or June were still very much alive, because if the female in the forefront is Sheila it would mean that she had not yet been shot at all, and if the female is June she must also have still been alive because in either example, with no shots at all in Sheila's case, she could not be dead (yet), because according to you the fatal second shot, neither the non fatal first shot had been fired by this stage, so Sheila would have to be alive at the time this video footage is being taken. On the other hand, the fatal shot between June Bambers eyes was the shot which killed her, so if the female is June Bamber, she was not dead by the time the crucial video footage was taken...

It's a PARADOX...

(End of game, game over, pass go and collect a thousand pounds) thank you very much...

[mike tesko]

Crimes that shook Britain - Jeremy Bamber. Image fades in and out in a flash, after 3.39 minutes...

[Jane]

The way I'm experiencing it Mike, is that you appear to be saying that Woman 1 has yet to be shot between the eyes and Woman 2 has yet to receive a fatal shot, ergo, should we choose to believe that the woman laying near the MFI furniture is June/Sheila, it was police shoooters who ended their lives. Personally, I DON'T believe it, but who knows. Everyone else may disagree with me.

[Mr. Gee]

Well it's much ado about nothing then?

[mike tesko]

The way I'm experiencing it Mike, is that you appear to be saying that Woman 1 has yet to be shot between the eyes and Woman 2 has yet to receive a fatal shot, ergo, should we choose to believe that the woman laying near the MFI furniture is June/Sheila, it was police shoooters who ended their lives. Personally, I DON'T believe it, but who knows. Everyone else may disagree with me.

For the sake of clarity, the three images I posted In sequential order are as follows:-

(a) - (Still image from video) the one with two bodies in, no blood on face of female in foreground...
(b) - (photo taken by PC Bird) the one showing two wounds on Sheila's neck, and blood running from sides of mouth and  neck...
(c) - (Still image from video) the one showing additional blood on face and neck...

Is your reference to MFI furniture supposed to be compelling evidence which undermines the credibility of the photographic still taken from video footage? Since, such furniture was available on sale from the late 1970's, onward...

[Jane]

For the sake of clarity, the three images I posted In sequential order are as follows:-

(a) - (Still image from video) the one with two bodies in, no blood on face of female in foreground...
(b) - (photo taken by PC Bird) the one showing two wounds on Sheila's neck, and blood running from sides of mouth and  neck...
(c) - (Still image from video) the one showing additional blood on face and neck...

Thank you Mike As I experience it:-

A. The (visible) woman in the still image from video is NEITHER Sheila nor June and it ISN'T the Bamber bedroom.
B. I'm as certain as is possible that THIS is Sheila.
C. If this is Sheila, the nightdress is entirely different  in colour/style from the one worn in B.

This, of course, is only MY opinion. Others, undoubtedly, will see it differently.

[mike tesko]

For the sake of clarity, the three images I posted In sequential order are as follows:-

(a) - (Still image from video) the one with two bodies in, no blood on face of female in foreground...
(b) - (photo taken by PC Bird) the one showing two wounds on Sheila's neck, and blood running from sides of mouth and  neck...
(c) - (Still image from video) the one showing additional blood on face and neck...

Is your reference to MFI furniture supposed to be compelling evidence which undermines the credibility of the photographic still taken from video footage? Since, such furniture was available on sale from the late 1970's, onward...

The case I am proposing by reference to these photographic images, is that (a) represents  a time in the proceedings when either Sheila had not been shot at all, or that she had been shot non fatally once, or that June Bamber had not yet been shot between the eyes. Photographic image (b) shows a time in the proceedings by which stage Sheila had been shot twice. Photographic image (c) shows a time in the proceedings when additional blood appears all over her face and neck...