Photographic still image taken from crime scene video - The shocking truth...

[Caroline]

I am not saying the still image that was taken from the crime scene video was taken when June ended up where shown by the time PC Bird started to take his photographs (10am). It should be obvious that if the female in the still image is June (and I believe it is) then by that stage when the crime scene was being videoed June Bamber had not yet been shot directly between the eyes, so on this basis Jeremy could not possibly have been responsible for shooting his mother between the eyes...

I don't think is.

[tyler]

In a nutshell - I don't know about anyone else (or I do really), I don't think either picture is June or Sheila.

Me neither. Like you,Im certain Ive seen this photo before and IIRC the deceased is a foreign woman.

[Jane]

I am not saying the still image that was taken from the crime scene video was taken when June ended up where shown by the time PC Bird started to take his photographs (10am). It should be obvious that if the female in the still image is June (and I believe it is) then by that stage when the crime scene was being videoed June Bamber had not yet been shot directly between the eyes, so on this basis Jeremy could not possibly have been responsible for shooting his mother between the eyes...

Mike, are you telling us that the police were responsible for shooting Sheila AND June?

[mike tesko]

Mike with more years experience than I care to mention, I can tell you categorically that the hair of the woman laying on the green carpet has neither the texture nor growth pattern /shape of Sheila or June.

The angle taken in the video footage cannot be compared against the view produced when PC Bird started to take photographs at around 10am...

The female looks like Sheila, as compared to the other image of the still photograph taken from the crime scene video showing additional blood all over Sheila's face and throat..

In any event, both still images were created from the same crime scene video...

And...

The female, in all three images posted is wearing the same set of earrings...

[mike tesko]

The same set of earrings, present in all images posted:-

[Caroline]

These pictures have been in the public domain for a long while and are actually on the forum. Had they been of any use. Jeremy would now be free. I'd be highly surprised if they would be taken seriously by anyone because they are stills but from a documentary on the WHF murders.

[Jane]

The same set of earrings, present in all images posted:-

Impossible to tell because of the poor quality of the picture.

[mike tesko]

These pictures have been in the public domain for a long while and are actually on the forum. Had they been of any use. Jeremy would now be free. I'd be highly surprised if they would be taken seriously by anyone because they are stills but from a documentary on the WHF murders.

CYCLOPS members are satisfied that the female in the photograph taken by PC Bird at around 10 am, and the photographic still taken from the crime scene video, showing additional blood all over Sheila's face and throat, as a result of CPR, is the same person - this has been confirmed by matching the blood stain (run) adjacent to the earlobe containing the earring attached to the victims right ear...

Check it out, for yourselves - it's definitely Sheila in both images...

[mike tesko]

Impossible to tell because of the poor quality of the picture.

The poor quality of the photographic still, showing Sheila with additional blood all over her face, is something I have no control over. Quality has been lost in the process adopted in producing still imagery from video footage. Experts in this field will be able to explain the processes used, and any deficiencies of quality from one technique using a video camera, as opposed to simply using a camera....

[Jane]

CYCLOPS members are satisfied that the female in the photograph taken by PC Bird at around 10 am, and the photographic still taken from the crime scene video, showing additional blood all over Sheila's face and throat, as a result of CPR, is the same person - this has been confirmed by matching the blood stain (run) adjacent to the earlobe containing the earring attached to the victims right ear...

Check it out, for yourselves - it's definitely Sheila in both images...

I guess being visually impaired is the result of having only one eye.

[Caroline]

CYCLOPS members are satisfied that the female in the photograph taken by PC Bird at around 10 am, and the photographic still taken from the crime scene video, showing additional blood all over Sheila's face and throat, as a result of CPR, is the same person - this has been confirmed by matching the blood stain (run) adjacent to the earlobe containing the earring attached to the victims right ear...

Check it out, for yourselves - it's definitely Sheila in both images...

They need to go to spec savers for a new monocle. Proof is in the pudding - but I won't be betting on freedom any time soon.

[mike tesko]

These two images are definitely of Sheila Caffell, one taken by camera, the other filmed and a still image produced from the footage.

[mike tesko]

And...

These two still photographic images taken from the crime scene video footage, are of similar quality befitting film footage taken at the scene on 7th August 1985...

One of these images was filmed before the other one, as shown in the sequence I have posted them in:-

[mike tesko]

If the female who was filmed is Sheila, then where is the blood running from the corners of her mouth, down from her nostril and pooled in her left eye socket? Where is the blood running diagonally across her neck? So, if the female shown was Sheila, she had most definitely not yet been shot on the second occasion by the time the video footage was being taken. She must have been shot after this footage was taken, which can only mean that she did shoot herself at some stage thereafter, or as the case may be, then the police shot her...

[mike tesko]

If the female who was filmed is Sheila, then where is the blood running from the corners of her mouth, down from her nostril and pooled in her left eye socket? Where is the blood running diagonally across her neck? So, if the female shown was Sheila, she had most definitely not yet been shot on the second occasion by the time the video footage was being taken. She must have been shot after this footage was taken, which can only mean that she did shoot herself at some stage thereafter, or as the case may be, then the police shot her...

If the female in the footage, is not Sheila, but is June Bamber, instead, then the following has to apply - by the time this image was being recorded on the crime scene video footage, June had not yet been shot between the eyes...

So, if Sheila no second shot into neck, if June not yet shot between the eyes, so we have a PARADOX, which I believe establishes beyond reasonable doubt that Jeremy did not shoot the second shot into Sheila's neck, or the shot between his mothers eyes. Whichever way you turn, Jeremy is in the clear, you cannot place Jeremy into that farmhouse after the crime scene video footage was being taken showing this key image where there is no visible blood around the mouth and throat (if the female was Sheila), or a bullet between the eyes (if the female is / was June)...