Miscellaneous Notes...

[guest154]

Yes, just read back but someone on here using the term 'sectioned' doesn't mean she was. I think they have just misused the word.

Funny how THAT can turn into all of the above. 

[scipio_usmc]

I worked in IT for over 12 years and have no idea where to look either. Not enough information.

Doing an advanced search limiting responses to the subject field  under Jeremy's pictures did the trick.

But as you and others have pointed out just because someone makes a claim here that doesn't mean it is true.  Lookout has a habit of repeating claims from news articles books or other posters because she likes what they post and thus wants to accept it instead of treating the claim as an allegation and investigating to see whether it is actually true.



 

[Patti]

Doing an advanced search limiting responses to the subject field  under Jeremy's pictures did the trick.

But as you and others have pointed out just because someone makes a claim here that doesn't mean it is true.  Lookout has a habit of repeating claims from news articles books or other posters because she likes what they post and thus wants to accept it instead of treating the claim as an allegation and investigating to see whether it is actually true.

Welcome back Scip....

[Caroline]

Doing an advanced search limiting responses to the subject field  under Jeremy's pictures did the trick.

But as you and others have pointed out just because someone makes a claim here that doesn't mean it is true.  Lookout has a habit of repeating claims from news articles books or other posters because she likes what they post and thus wants to accept it instead of treating the claim as an allegation and investigating to see whether it is actually true.

Hey! You're back! 

[scipio_usmc]

Hey! You're back! 

yes though the message said my ban expired after 4 days it took 6 to wear off.

[Caroline]

yes though the message said my ban expired after 4 days it took 6 to wear off.

Not sure why that should be, but it may be due to the difference in time zones?

[scipio_usmc]

Not sure why that should be, but it may be due to the difference in time zones?

Till you set your clocks ahead you are only 4 hours ahead.  At worst you end up 6 hours ahead not 48 

[Caroline]

Till you set your clocks ahead you are only 4 hours ahead.  At worst you end up 6 hours ahead not 48 

Maybe they thought they just needed a bit more peace? 

[lookout]

Do you mean Steve? I don´t think he is being nasty, I just think he doesn´t know how to find it. Personally I have no idea where to look from what you write - and I am not trying to be nasty, I just don´t know where to look.

Not being funny,Alias,but it was posted by your own fair hand  Do a search on here " Jeremy Pictures ! August 2011.

[lookout]

It would appear that whatever I post these days,it comes under close scrutiny as though I've just made it up. After all, because NONE of us were at the scene and DON'T know what had happened,we ALL read what is already written in the hope that there might be some truth in it.,
Other than this,it's pretty much ALL supposition,so let's not forget that,particularly those who THINK that they're right !

[Caroline]

Not being funny,Alias,but it was posted by your own fair hand  Do a search on here " Jeremy Pictures ! August 2011.

It wasn't Alias, it was Chochokeira.

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,1346.msg42018.html#msg42018

[lookout]

Doing an advanced search limiting responses to the subject field  under Jeremy's pictures did the trick.

But as you and others have pointed out just because someone makes a claim here that doesn't mean it is true.  Lookout has a habit of repeating claims from news articles books or other posters because she likes what they post and thus wants to accept it instead of treating the claim as an allegation and investigating to see whether it is actually true.

I have " a habit of repeating claims ",do I ? Take a look around you,again,I'm not the only one !!
It's ALL repetitive so far as I can see/read-------------nothing new,even from you,same old,same old BS.

[lookout]

It wasn't Alias, it was Chochokeira.

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,1346.msg42018.html#msg42018

That was because in 2011,the way the posts appeared was misleading,but nevertheless I saw what was written and Keira was a good and knowledgeable poster.

[lookout]

Not being funny,Alias,but it was posted by your own fair hand  Do a search on here " Jeremy Pictures ! August 2011.

APOLOGIES,Alias. It WASN'T you,it was Keira. I followed the wrong line down, as it was in 2011,when posts weren't " separated ".

[Caroline]

That was because in 2011,the way the posts appeared was misleading,but nevertheless I saw what was written and Keira was a good and knowledgeable poster.

I'm sure she was but JUST her 'say so' isn't enough to take it as  a fact.