Very disturbing new developments...

[mike tesko]

Now that I know and I have had it confirmed that B. Taylor worked at Essex police DHQ force armory, and that any unofficial test firing of the gun, silencer and control ammunition, was done there, rather than at the L:ab', it has consequences upon the integrity of any evidence given by the prosecutions ballistics expert, Malcolm Fletcher, in the following areas:-

(1) Silencer
(2) control ammunition
(3) pull-through of rifle
(4) Backspatter

Ewen Smith's suspicions were justified, after all...

Fletcher deceived the court with his reports and conclusions about the aforementioned exhibits, and because he lied about not knowing when the gun had last been fired prior to 20th September 1985, his evidence can no longer be relied upon to sustain these convictions...

[mike tesko]

When I visited Ewen Smith in 2003 / 04, he used to say that he suspected the ballistics expert, Malcolm Fletcher, of being dodgy...

Mike

Do you know why Jeremy sacked Ewen Smith?

-----------------

Yes, of course...

[jon]

B. Taylor, worked at DHQ force Amory, and he carried out the unofficial test firing there, before the crime scene ammunition, rifle and silencer, was sent to the Lab' to be checked and examined by Malcolm Fletcher, on 20th September 1985...

The testing done by B. Taylor at the force armory, was known about by Fletcher, despite the fact that Fletcher made a witness statement saying that prior to the official test firing of the weapon, and control ammunition on and after 20th September 1985, that he did not know when the gun had last been fired...

Fletcher lied...

He signed the same general examination records that were signed by B. Taylor and would have known that he fired the gun with control ammunition on dates before 20th September 1985...

Great work Mike , clear as day he is innocent , but every now and again a fool like Tut Tut or The Baggotman will turn up and tell us otherwise you know them Little Dickie 

[mike tesko]

B. Taylor, worked at DHQ force Amory, and he carried out the unofficial test firing there, before the crime scene ammunition, rifle and silencer, was sent to the Lab' to be checked and examined by Malcolm Fletcher, on 20th September 1985...

The testing done by B. Taylor at the force armory, was known about by Fletcher, despite the fact that Fletcher made a witness statement saying that prior to the official test firing of the weapon, and control ammunition on and after 20th September 1985, that he did not know when the gun had last been fired...

Fletcher lied...

He signed the same general examination records that were signed by B. Taylor and would have known that he fired the gun with control ammunition on dates before 20th September 1985...

He's still guilty.

-----

Who are you referring to?

[Richard lee]

The expert evaluation of the ballistics, is now severely undermined, because it can now be proven that Malcolm Fletcher, and B. Taylor, decieved the court by presenting misleading ballistics findings, as undisputed fact...

Even if true just one part of the case and there is more than enough to prove him guilty. Once again we wait for this fantastic new evidence.

[ngb1066]

When I visited Ewen Smith in 2003 / 04, he used to say that he suspected the ballistics expert, Malcolm Fletcher, of being dodgy...

Mike

Do you know why Jeremy sacked Ewen Smith?

-----------------

Yes, of course...

Are you prepared to say why?  It seems that progress was being made on a number of fronts and some of that seems to have been discontinued or at least delayed when Ewen Smith was sacked.  Obviously if there are reasons why you are unwilling to discuss this on an open forum I will respect that.

[mike tesko]

Anyway, what I propose to do, is post all the general examination records for all the crime scene ammunition, that I have in my possession, so that everyone can see for themselves that there must have been and was a conspiracy between B. Taylor and Malcolm Fletcher, to produce a false report and conclusions regarding the batch of crime scene ammunition...

There are very serious consequences to these activities which cannot be underestimated or ignored...

Since, an innocent mans liberty is at stake...

[mike tesko]

The expert evaluation of the ballistics, is now severely undermined, because it can now be proven that Malcolm Fletcher, and B. Taylor, decieved the court by presenting misleading ballistics findings, as undisputed fact...

Even if true just one part of the case and there is more than enough to prove him guilty. Once again we wait for this fantastic new evidence.

-------------

Stop being ridiculous, if the ballistic evidence was fabricated it means th e case against him collapses...

Get a life...

Stop being absolutely pathetic...

[John]

B. Taylor, worked at DHQ force Amory, and he carried out the unofficial test firing there, before the crime scene ammunition, rifle and silencer, was sent to the Lab' to be checked and examined by Malcolm Fletcher, on 20th September 1985...

The testing done by B. Taylor at the force armory, was known about by Fletcher, despite the fact that Fletcher made a witness statement saying that prior to the official test firing of the weapon, and control ammunition on and after 20th September 1985, that he did not know when the gun had last been fired...

Fletcher lied...

He signed the same general examination records that were signed by B. Taylor and would have known that he fired the gun with control ammunition on dates before 20th September 1985...

Great work Mike , clear as day he is innocent , but every now and again a fool like Tut Tut or The Baggotman will turn up and tell us otherwise you know them Little Dickie 

That means absolutely nothing in real terms. 

So what if the gun was tested several times, that in itself is of no benefit to any claims of innocence.  talk about grasping at straws!   

[mike tesko]

When I visited Ewen Smith in 2003 / 04, he used to say that he suspected the ballistics expert, Malcolm Fletcher, of being dodgy...

Mike

Do you know why Jeremy sacked Ewen Smith?

-----------------

Yes, of course...

Are you prepared to say why?  It seems that progress was being made on a number of fronts and some of that seems to have been discontinued or at least delayed when Ewen Smith was sacked.  Obviously if there are reasons why you are unwilling to discuss this on an open forum I will respect that.

-----------------

I might be prepared to give one or two insights, but I can't go into everything, since it would not be fair to both Jeremy, or to Ewen, who I got on very well with...

[mike tesko]

B. Taylor, worked at DHQ force Amory, and he carried out the unofficial test firing there, before the crime scene ammunition, rifle and silencer, was sent to the Lab' to be checked and examined by Malcolm Fletcher, on 20th September 1985...

The testing done by B. Taylor at the force armory, was known about by Fletcher, despite the fact that Fletcher made a witness statement saying that prior to the official test firing of the weapon, and control ammunition on and after 20th September 1985, that he did not know when the gun had last been fired...

Fletcher lied...

He signed the same general examination records that were signed by B. Taylor and would have known that he fired the gun with control ammunition on dates before 20th September 1985...

Great work Mike , clear as day he is innocent , but every now and again a fool like Tut Tut or The Baggotman will turn up and tell us otherwise you know them Little Dickie 

That means absolutely nothing in real terms. 

So what if the gun was tested several times, that in itself is of no benefit to any claims of innocence.  talk about grasping at straws!   

-----------

Listen very carefully, and take notice, I can only put up with so much nonsense, and unless you are prepared to talk reasonably I will have no choice but to ban you - I will debate any aspect of this case with anyone, even the relatives or the police involved, but please stop taking the piss, or in other words "FUCK OFF"...

[Richard lee]

The expert evaluation of the ballistics, is now severely undermined, because it can now be proven that Malcolm Fletcher, and B. Taylor, decieved the court by presenting misleading ballistics findings, as undisputed fact...

Even if true just one part of the case and there is more than enough to prove him guilty. Once again we wait for this fantastic new evidence.

-------------

Stop being ridiculous, if the ballistic evidence was fabricated it means th e case against him collapses...

Get a life...

Stop being absolutely pathetic...

Felon Mike... you want to stop being pathetic cause from where i am standing he's still in jail, either put up or shut up...

[ngb1066]

Anyway, what I propose to do, is post all the general examination records for all the crime scene ammunition, that I have in my possession, so that everyone can see for themselves that there must have been and was a conspiracy between B. Taylor and Malcolm Fletcher, to produce a false report and conclusions regarding the batch of crime scene ammunition...

There are very serious consequences to these activities which cannot be underestimated or ignored...

Since, an innocent mans liberty is at stake...

The most serious aspect of an "unofficial" earlier test firing of the rifle by the police is that any blood inside the barrel of the rifle produced as a result of backspatter would almost certainly have been completely eliminated by the firing of the rifle.  Therefore the point relied upon at trial by the prosecution that the silencer must have been attached to the rifle during the shooting because of the lack of blood inside the barrel of the rifle is completely discredited.  Although this may not seem much in the overall scale of things it is nevertheless a very important piece of evidence which assists Jeremy's appeal.  I will be interested to read more about this.

[Richard lee]

B. Taylor, worked at DHQ force Amory, and he carried out the unofficial test firing there, before the crime scene ammunition, rifle and silencer, was sent to the Lab' to be checked and examined by Malcolm Fletcher, on 20th September 1985...

The testing done by B. Taylor at the force armory, was known about by Fletcher, despite the fact that Fletcher made a witness statement saying that prior to the official test firing of the weapon, and control ammunition on and after 20th September 1985, that he did not know when the gun had last been fired...

Fletcher lied...

He signed the same general examination records that were signed by B. Taylor and would have known that he fired the gun with control ammunition on dates before 20th September 1985...

Great work Mike , clear as day he is innocent , but every now and again a fool like Tut Tut or The Baggotman will turn up and tell us otherwise you know them Little Dickie 

That means absolutely nothing in real terms. 

So what if the gun was tested several times, that in itself is of no benefit to any claims of innocence.  talk about grasping at straws!   

-----------

Listen very carefully, and take notice, I can only put up with so much nonsense, and unless you are prepared to talk reasonably I will have no choice but to ban you - I will debate any aspect of this case with anyone, even the relatives or the police involved, but please stop taking the piss, or in other words "FUCK OFF"...

Desperate times for desperate people me thinks and stop getting so angry when you lose an argument 

[Richard lee]

B. Taylor, worked at DHQ force Amory, and he carried out the unofficial test firing there, before the crime scene ammunition, rifle and silencer, was sent to the Lab' to be checked and examined by Malcolm Fletcher, on 20th September 1985...

The testing done by B. Taylor at the force armory, was known about by Fletcher, despite the fact that Fletcher made a witness statement saying that prior to the official test firing of the weapon, and control ammunition on and after 20th September 1985, that he did not know when the gun had last been fired...

Fletcher lied...

He signed the same general examination records that were signed by B. Taylor and would have known that he fired the gun with control ammunition on dates before 20th September 1985...

Great work Mike , clear as day he is innocent , but every now and again a fool like Tut Tut or The Baggotman will turn up and tell us otherwise you know them Little Dickie 

That means absolutely nothing in real terms. 

So what if the gun was tested several times, that in itself is of no benefit to any claims of innocence.  talk about grasping at straws!   

-----------

Listen very carefully, and take notice, I can only put up with so much nonsense, and unless you are prepared to talk reasonably I will have no choice but to ban you - I will debate any aspect of this case with anyone, even the relatives or the police involved, but please stop taking the piss, or in other words "FUCK OFF"...

Try it in court where it counts  :D