Two bodies in the kitchen. A time for closure ?

[Jan]

Do you think Sheila was in the kitchen when the raid team entered WHF ?

Mr Gee has his opinions - I am not being drawn on that. why do you think the logs do not match how you think the police just had a case of mistaken ID?

[Adam]

Mr Gee has his opinions - I am not being drawn on that. why do you think the logs do not match how you think the police just had a case of mistaken ID?

You refuse to give you're opinion on a discussion forum.

I have given my opinion in the thread post. Even suggesting it is time for closure.

Forget about the logs. Do you believe Sheila was in the kitchen when the raid team entered WHF ?

[Jan]

You refuse to give you're opinion on a discussion forum.

I have given my opinion in the thread post. Even suggesting it is time for closure.

Forget about the logs. Do you believe Sheila was in the kitchen when the raid team entered WHF ?

Adam one question at a time - if there was a case of the police though the body was June - why does it say one dead male one dead female ?

[Mr. Gee]

You refuse to give you're opinion on a discussion forum.

I have given my opinion in the thread post. Even suggesting it is time for closure.

Forget about the logs. Do you believe Sheila was in the kitchen when the raid team entered WHF ?

It is the logs that will tell you that answer. But you refuse to believe them, instead believing other logs that said she was not. But some logs say she was. In fact we cannot forget about the logs, because all our opinions are based upon what the logs say. What we want to know is why some logs say one thing and why some say another?
I just refuse to see those logs as a simple mistake.

[Caroline]

Adam one question at a time - if there was a case of the police though the body was June - why does it say one dead male one dead female ?

I agree with Hartley's explanation of this - I'll try and find it.

[Mr. Gee]

I agree with Hartley's explanation of this - I'll try and find it.

I don't. I think it was just his opinion. There were just too many mistakes for them to be mistakes.

[Jane]

It is the logs that will tell you that answer. But you refuse to believe them, instead believing other logs that said she was not. But some logs say she was. In fact we cannot forget about the logs, because all our opinions are based upon what the logs say. What we want to know is why some logs say one thing and why some say another?
I just refuse to see those logs as a simple mistake.

It's possibly worth considering that the reason Adam presents so many -and frequently worthless- points is in order to cover all basses so it becomes unnecessary for him to respond to our questions. All he has to do is refer us back to a thread. When was the last time he answered you without sidestepping?

[Alias]

It's possibly worth considering that the reason Adam presents so many -and frequently worthless- points is in order to cover all basses so it becomes unnecessary for him to respond to our questions. All he has to do is refer us back to a thread. When was the last time he answered you without sidestepping?

He hardly ever does. He has this pre-designed molds which he links to.

[Jan]

I agree with Hartley's explanation of this - I'll try and find it.

I have seen Hartleys explanation .

I  still believe the logs can still be looked at both ways.

[Adam]

It's possibly worth considering that the reason Adam presents so many -and frequently worthless- points is in order to cover all basses so it becomes unnecessary for him to respond to our questions. All he has to do is refer us back to a thread. When was the last time he answered you without sidestepping?

You don't say any bad points.

Or say any good points.

Or say any points at all.

Or create threads.

Or say why you changed from innocent to guilty after I joined.

You just post to or about me.

I hope when I become elderly there will be more in my life than just posting to or about someone I have never spoken to. 

[Adam]

It is the logs that will tell you that answer. But you refuse to believe them, instead believing other logs that said she was not. But some logs say she was. In fact we cannot forget about the logs, because all our opinions are based upon what the logs say. What we want to know is why some logs say one thing and why some say another?
I just refuse to see those logs as a simple mistake.

Well a log on the night said one male, one female. My thread post explains why.

The crime scene photos have Sheila in the bedroom and Neville downstairs.

[Caroline]

I have seen Hartleys explanation .

I  still believe the logs can still be looked at both ways.

I agree that there are several seemingly odd things about the logs but the fact that they can be explained took the mystery out of it for me.

[Jane]

He hardly ever does. He has this pre-designed molds which he links to.

Alias, I'm inclined to think it's because he can't. We probably all have entrenched views but most of us are prepared to look at them and change our minds if we feel it necessary. Adam HAS to be the greatest gift EVER to those here who believe Jeremy innocent. Because on some of the inanities he puts forward he's actually done FAR more to support Jeremy than condemn him.

[Jan]

You don't say any bad points.

Or say any good points.

Or say any points at all.

Or create threads.

Or say why you changed from innocent to guilty after I joined.

You just post to or about me.

I hope when I become elderly there will be more in my life than just posting to or about someone I have never spoken to.

RUDE AND PERSONAL POST .

[Caroline]

You must admit, he's absolutely BRILLIANT at 'commanding' the whole boards attention though!!