Mr Gee sorry but one of the reasons I changed from innocent to guilty is the phone call from Ralph Bamber to Jeremy I have seen no proof that this phone call was made we only have Jeremy's word for it 
Had the call taken place Jeremy would not have phoned Julie then the police after he had found their number in the phone book I know my logic would have been to get the police out to WHF as quickly as possible. This alone in Jeremy's way of thinking was meant to convince EP of his innocence. I have always posted on this forum these alleged phone calls did Jeremy Bamber more harm than good. None of us on this forum know what exactly happened we all perceive the events differently I don't see too much evidence to prove his innocence or guilt we are just discussing the matter. I would never be so arrogant to say what you perceive is wrong of course you could be right and I wrong.
The way I see it is that Jeremy never claimed originally this call happened because 1) he would not have known 2) at the time of the trial he had not seen both logs.
I know there is some confusion , or has been in the past about which log was shown at the trial , but the fact is both were not shown side by side. And it is not until you see them side by side that there can be questions raised. I am not convinced the call happened however I do find the timing discrepancies within EP and the changing of the times of the calls between Julies statements dodgy to say the least . Were they because they needed the times to be different to cover something up? I am not sure.
I am not excusing anything, but if your were JB and you were innocent and you found those logs , would you not cling on to the discrepancies as some kind of indication that there was another call?
