Author Topic: Playboy or Not?  (Read 1769 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline maggie

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13651
Re: Playboy or Not?
« Reply #15 on: December 16, 2014, 08:57:PM »
I might break one of my rules and read some other books about the case after Christmas because from Colins Book I still did not get much of a picture of Jeremy or Sheila at all . I think I know enough from actual documents to weed out the truth  so I may give it a go. I am intelligent enough to suss out the difference between fact and fiction now I think ::)
People say Scott Lomax is biased in Jeremy's favour Jan but I didn't find it so but it is a factual book and not tell you much more about Jeremy and Sheila's personalities.  It's more up to date with evidence than Wilkes's but Wilkes is OK as well imo ;)

Mr. Gee

  • Guest
Re: Playboy or Not?
« Reply #16 on: December 16, 2014, 09:05:PM »
People say Scott Lomax is biased in Jeremy's favour Jan but I didn't find it so but it is a factual book and not tell you much more about Jeremy and Sheila's personalities.  It's more up to date with evidence than Wilkes's but Wilkes is OK as well imo ;)
Actually I found that Scott Lomax kept close to the known facts of the case and drew deductions from those. Only those who disagree with him say that he is biased. I didn't see that he was biased at all.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Playboy or Not?
« Reply #17 on: December 16, 2014, 09:23:PM »
Actually I found that Scott Lomax kept close to the known facts of the case and drew deductions from those. Only those who disagree with him say that he is biased. I didn't see that he was biased at all.





I would say that Scott Lomax is nearer the mark as to what went on that night.His book is without the elaborations of others.

Offline maggie

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13651
Re: Playboy or Not?
« Reply #18 on: December 16, 2014, 09:55:PM »




I would say that Scott Lomax is nearer the mark as to what went on that night.His book is without the elaborations of others.
I agree, he stuck to the facts without embellishment, interesting how many guilters accuse him of bias.

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: Playboy or Not?
« Reply #19 on: December 16, 2014, 10:07:PM »
I read the scott lomax book I don't think he was biased . I read it because it was the most recent . I have not read any of the earlier books.

mertol22

  • Guest
Re: Playboy or Not?
« Reply #20 on: December 16, 2014, 10:07:PM »
Its almost as if Jeremy is being re moulded or put into a comprised list of what he is or was , in his younger days nothing is not normal he was or did was he a playboy not as I see it he was not a slob  he was not scruffy  quite the opposite he has done things I never had like having relationships and for that he is more human than me that reminds me I have a card to send him this week.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33784
Re: Playboy or Not?
« Reply #21 on: December 16, 2014, 10:27:PM »
Its almost as if Jeremy is being re moulded or put into a comprised list of what he is or was , in his younger days nothing is not normal he was or did was he a playboy not as I see it he was not a slob  he was not scruffy  quite the opposite he has done things I never had like having relationships and for that he is more human than me that reminds me I have a card to send him this week.



Quite honestly, Mertol, I really can't see that Jeremy did anything very different from other young men of his type and there's little about his life at the time to draw adverse comment. When I said he was a play boy I suppose I meant that he probably cottoned on to the fact that women liked him, made themselves available to him and he used it to advantage.. What red blooded young man would be ungallant enough to turn them down ;D With a house which was rent free plus other perks he was probably quite free with funds which would have been an added attraction.