Sheila's medical condition = A brutal multiple murderer ?

[Adam]

He CAN'T discuss it Jan because he has neither the knowledge nor the interest in anything which diverts him from the frivolous. Instead he sets up YET another irrelevant thread in which the only difference from two others is the destination.

You only post on here to or about me. Because you have nothing worthwhile to say.

But you should be thanking me. You changed you're mind after I joined. Not liking Mary's & Julie's trial outfits  .

And I answered Jan's question about Jeremy committing the massacre despite having no medical issues. It is called being greedy.

Anyway pre trial people did say he showed classic signs of being a psychopath.

[Adam]

Yes he has just proved he is incapable of discussion in any form - I will not be answering his posts - not doubt he will have some analogy of why we have him on ignore , but perhaps he should consider that he is one of the only posters I know who manages to wind up the posters who are actually on his "side of the fence"  . That is quite an achievement . But not one to be proud of .

If you put me on ignore you will not have anything to post. As the last few months you have only posted to or about me.

People are biased about Julie, June & the relatives. Insinuating they framed an innocent man.

[Alias]

If you put me on ignore you will not have anything to post. As the last few months you have only posted to or about me.

People are biased about Julie, June & the relatives. Insinuating they framed an innocent man.

Actually we had some very pleasant conversations and discussion while you were on your last gardening leave - don´t flatter yourself! The only thing you do is disrupt the board making everything about yourself.

[Adam]

Actually we had some very pleasant conversations and discussion while you were on your last gardening leave - don´t flatter yourself! The only thing you do is disrupt the board making everything about yourself.

Do you think Sheila's medical condition made her into a brutal killer ?

That was what my thread post was about. People focus on me because I highlight Jeremy's guilt.

[Alias]

Do you think Sheila's medical condition made her into a brutal killer ?

That was what my thread post was about. People focus on me because I highlight Jeremy's guilt.

No, because you are super-annoying.

[nugnug]

Do you think Sheila's medical condition made her into a brutal killer ?

That was what my thread post was about. People focus on me because I highlight Jeremy's guilt.

no i think her medication did.

[Jane]

You only post on here to or about me. Because you have nothing worthwhile to say.

But you should be thanking me. You changed you're mind after I joined. Not liking Mary's & Julie's trial outfits  .

And I answered Jan's question about Jeremy committing the massacre despite having no medical issues. It is called being greedy.

Anyway pre trial people did say he showed classic signs of being a psychopath.

And you actually believe that YOU are saying anything worthwhile, do you. Most of what emerges from your mouth is unadulterated FILTH directed at whoever you pick as your next victim. Your mentality is such that you seem to derive some kind of vicarious pleasure from telling posters AD NAUSEUM that I thought Julie and her mother were dressed, if not like tarts, like they were going to the races instead of court. WHY would I expect otherwise from someone who maintains Jeremy is guilty because he wore a Hugo Boss suit. At a rough guess I'd say you serve the innocent side better than the guilty side but as neither side would rate you as their favourite poster that's about as relevant as you are. It's just as well you have such a conceited and overblown opinion of your powers of persuasion because YOU are the only one who has. In fact, the chances are, that the only time you're liked is when you're one gardening leave....................which, for those who don't yet know, is the colloquial for SERVING A BAN.

[Adam]

And you actually believe that YOU are saying anything worthwhile, do you. Most of what emerges from your mouth is unadulterated FILTH directed at whoever you pick as your next victim. Your mentality is such that you seem to derive some kind of vicarious pleasure from telling posters AD NAUSEUM that I thought Julie and her mother were dressed, if not like tarts, like they were going to the races instead of court. WHY would I expect otherwise from someone who maintains Jeremy is guilty because he wore a Hugo Boss suit. At a rough guess I'd say you serve the innocent side better than the guilty side but as neither side would rate you as their favourite poster that's about as relevant as you are. It's just as well you have such a conceited and overblown opinion of your powers of persuasion because YOU are the only one who has. In fact, the chances are, that the only time you're liked is when you're one gardening leave....................which, for those who don't yet know, is the colloquial for SERVING A BAN.

I have reported this to the moderators. I have never posted 'unadulterated filth'

Why did you change from innocent to guilty after 29 years then ?

You previously said you did not like Mary's & Julie's trial outfits. You changed to guilty directly after Susan & Caroline. And after Alias said she was undecided. There is no shame in saying you want to stay with the majority on here to try to be popular.

There are lots of reasons why I think Jeremy is guilty. I have only mentioned his Hugo Boss suit in the 'A funeral, a time to grieve, or a time to celebrate' thread.

My reasons for thinking he is guilty are in other threads. Which you have read as you are always commenting in them.

[Alias]

I have reported this to the moderators. I have never posted 'unadulterated filth'

Why did you change from innocent to guilty after 29 years then ?

You previously said you did not like Mary's & Julie's trial outfits. You changed to guilty directly after Susan & Caroline. And after Alias said she was undecided. There is no shame in saying you want to stay with the majority on here to try to be popular.

There are lots of reasons why I think Jeremy is guilty. I have only mentioned his Hugo Boss suit in the 'A funeral, a time to grieve, or a time to celebrate' thread.

My reasons for thinking he is guilty are in other threads. Which you have read as you are always commenting in them.

Again - stop using me in your sick game! I have been undecided from day one I knew about this case. Years before you appeared here. My stance has nothing, not a thing, to do with you.
I have said this about ten times to you, yet you keep repeating this rubbish. If you do it again, I will report you.

[Adam]

Again - stop using me in your sick game! I have been undecided from day one I knew about this case. Years before you appeared here. My stance has nothing, not a thing, to do with you.
I have said this about ten times to you, yet you keep repeating this rubbish. If you do it again, I will report you.

You announced it on here. After Susan said mine & Harters posts helped persuade her to change stance, & Caroline said something about a wallet & last harvest changing her stance. Then April changed stance after you're announcement but did not say why.

Every other poster on forums seem to be think he is guilty or innocent. Being undecided is rare.

[Jane]

I have reported this to the moderators. I have never posted 'unadulterated filth'

Why did you change from innocent to guilty after 29 years then ?

You previously said you did not like Mary's & Julie's trial outfits. You changed to guilty directly after Susan & Caroline. And after Alias said she was undecided. There is no shame in saying you want to stay with the majority on here to try to be popular.

There are lots of reasons why I think Jeremy is guilty. I have only mentioned his Hugo Boss suit in the 'A funeral, a time to grieve, or a time to celebrate' thread.

My reasons for thinking he is guilty are in other threads. Which you have read as you are always commenting in them.

Adam, if it pleases you go right ahead and report away as many times as makes you happy. Much good may it do you because you've lost any credibility you MAY have once had and you're probably regarded as nothing more than an irritating JOKE. There's no other here who has such a high opinion of their own capabilities that they believe, like you, that they're capable of changing posters' minds by the eloquence of their own words, NEITHER do they DEMAND of others that they say WHY their minds have been changed which means that, unlike you, they don't throw toys out of prams when they don't get an answer.

I read your quoted threads. The rest, according to the few who DO read them, aren't worth bothering with.

[Alias]

You announced it on here. After Susan said mine & Harters posts helped persuade her to change stance, & Caroline said something about a wallet & last harvest changing her stance. Then April changed stance after you're announcement but did not say why.

Every other poster on forums seem to be think he is guilty or innocent. Being undecided is rare.

I see that you still don´t get it. I am not surprised. You have a hardwood kind of mind. I give up, Adam. Everone here knows that I have said all along that I am undecided - from day one.
What you think is unimportant - just leave this out of your posts in the future though, because it is not correct.

[Caroline]

You announced it on here. After Susan said mine & Harters posts helped persuade her to change stance, & Caroline said something about a wallet & last harvest changing her stance. Then April changed stance after you're announcement but did not say why.

Every other poster on forums seem to be think he is guilty or innocent. Being undecided is rare.

People don't change their opinion overnight Adam, it's a build up of things. However, once doubt sets in, it's hard to shake. I honestly don't think anyone changed their mind because of something someone else said. Susan was just winding you up - odd that you didn't recognise it being as you're quite fond of doing it yourself! 

[Alias]

People don't change their opinion overnight Adam, it's a build up of things. However, once doubt sets in, it's hard to shake. I honestly don't think anyone changed their mind because of something someone else said. Susan was just winding you up - odd that you didn't recognise it being as you're quite fond of doing it yourself! 

Thing is, I haven´t changed my opinion at all. Well, perhaps about some details I used to buy into, but overall it is the same: I don´t know who committed the murders, I have problems with myths on both sides, I have problems with the whole scene around Sheila´s body in the bedroom. It has always been that way for me, it may be rare to be undecided, but I am. Always have been.

[Adam]

Robert Boutflour continued his investigation.

Sargent Barlow told him there was no evidence of Sheila suffering from any drug induced psychosis. And Freddie Emani said Sheila had lost all co ordination in her last weeks. Needing two hands to drink water.

Ann Eaton's reaction to Sheila re loading was 'WHAT'. This did not relate to the woman who had trouble putting sugar in tea.