The triple frame claim. A time for closure ?

[Adam]

Anyone in prison for being framed can rightly feel aggrieved. Whether it's an ex girlfriend, relatives or police who have done the framing.

I created a thread requesting any other examples of (apparently) jilted women putting ex's in jail for life. There were none. I don't recall any other cases where wealthy and respectable relatives have turned on innocent men, in order to get their greedy paws on money. The police force is a massive organisation & there are isolated cases of corruption.

However Jeremy is claiming a triple frame - girlfriend, relatives & police. In one case ! Surely this is a first & shows him as the unluckiest man in the world.

For such an unlucky man, who has been conned out of his rightful inheritance he seems very laid back and relaxed about the whole affair. Singing answers to police questions in 1985 & now creating nice online blogs.

Each alleged frame has been discussed in detail on this board. Each one as ridiculous as the other. Jeremy claiming a triple frame just makes his 'Campaign for Freedom' even more lame.

Do people believe it is time for closure on the triple frame theory ?

[Jan]

I am sure Scipio would love to discuss your thread with you 

Did you watch the programme explained their methods of working in the 80s?

Perhaps there were more cases of framing than you think ? Its just that some have not yet been proved?

[Adam]

Yes but here is an unprecedented triple frame in one case. Against a man who had horrifically lost his family in a brutal massacre. 

Julie, a very young student approaching the police and lying. Then lying in court and risking perjury charges. Why ? Because she was allegedly jilted.

Then the wealthy and respectable relatives risking criminal charges and putting an innocent man in jail for life. Why ? So they can inherit money between them.

Then the police decided to risk their reputations by getting the lab technicians to put incriminating blood on the clean silencer the relatives gave them. Why ? The relatives asked them to. And to also risk their careers and reputations & get Douglas Hurd to give them a public tongue lashing. Even after they secured a conviction.


But at least Jeremy seems to be in jolly good spirits while in prison. Judging by his postings.

[lookout]

He's got no other reason than to be " jolly " because he knows he's INNOCENT !!

Watch this space !

[Jan]

Yes but here is an unprecedented triple frame in one case. Against a man who had horrifically lost his family in a brutal massacre. 

Julie, a very young student approaching the police and lying. Then lying in court and risking perjury charges. Why ? Because she was allegedly jilted.

Then the wealthy and respectable relatives risking criminal charges and putting an innocent man in jail for life. Why ? So they can inherit money between them.

Then the police decided to risk their reputations by getting the lab technicians to put incriminating blood on the clean silencer the relatives gave them. Why ? The relatives asked them to. And to also risk their careers and reputations & get Douglas Hurd to give them a public tongue lashing. Even after they secured a conviction.


But at least Jeremy seems to be in jolly good spirits while in prison. Judging by his postings.

Adam - you are linking things together that have been discussed . Does not mean all those things happened. Its a DISCUSSION forum . And contrary to your belief in most areas there have not been conclusive evidence either way .