Jeremy disposing his massacre clothes: A time for closure ?

[Adam]

Jeremy's supporters are often claiming he would not have the opportunity to dispose of his massacre night clothes. Am I missing something ?

The clothes may not have ended up with much blood anyway. June, Sheila and the twins were shot without resistance. By a long rifle. So unlikely that any back splatter would hit Jeremy.

Neville also received his first four shots from a distance. There was a kitchen fight, but unless they were rolling around on the floor, Jeremy would have remained virtually blood free. Certainly most of it would go after a washing machine spin. He may have even met the police without changing. Just putting extra layers on. He was well clothed for August.

Anyway if he was covered in blood, he had a month to dispose of the evidence. During this time he went on several jolly ups with Brett, Julie and other buddies. To London, Eastbourne, Amsterdam & St Tropez. So could have disposed of clothes anywhere in England, or in two other countries.

Or he could even dispose of the clothes on the night. He knew the farm land very well.

Claiming Jeremy could not have got clothes which may have had a few spots of blood on through customs, is also weak. Customs only check the inside of very few suitcases. They are looking for drugs, not blood. The London/Amsterdam customs were pretty weak as Jeremy smuggled a lot of cannabis through, just after the massacre.

Do other people think Jeremy did or did not have plenty of time to dispose of clothes ?

[Mr. Gee]

Jeremy's supporters are often claiming he would not have the opportunity to dispose of his massacre night clothes. Am I missing something ?

The clothes may not have ended up with much blood anyway. June, Sheila and the twins were shot without resistance. By a long rifle. So unlikely that any back splatter would hit Jeremy.

Neville also received his first four shots from a distance. There was a kitchen fight, but unless they were rolling around on the floor, Jeremy would have remained virtually blood free. Certainly most of it would go after a washing machine spin. He may have even met the police without changing. Just putting extra layers on. He was well clothed for August.

Anyway if he was covered in blood, he had a month to dispose of the evidence. During this time he went on several jolly ups with Brett, Julie and other buddies. To London, Eastbourne, Amsterdam & St Tropez. So could have disposed of clothes anywhere in England, or in two other countries.

Or he could even dispose of the clothes on the night. He knew the farm land very well.

Claiming Jeremy could not have got clothes which may have had a few spots of blood on through customs, is also weak. Customs only check the inside of very few suitcases. They are looking for drugs, not blood. The London/Amsterdam customs were pretty weak as Jeremy smuggled a lot of cannabis through, just after the massacre.

Do other people think Jeremy did or did not have plenty of time to dispose of clothes ?

You do of course realise that everything you've just written there could be applied to Sheila as well?

[Adam]

You do of course realise that everything you've just written there could be applied to Sheila as well?

Well the thread is regarding the police not finding any forensic evidence on Jeremy's clothes. After they searched one month later. People saying the police would have found something as Jeremy did not have the opportunity to dispose of them in a one month period.

Maybe he gave them to Brett. He had given him Neville's Citroen.

[Mr. Gee]

Well the thread is regarding the police not finding any forensic evidence on Jeremy's clothes. After they searched one month later. People saying the police would have found something as Jeremy did not have the opportunity to dispose of them in a one month period.

Maybe he gave them to Brett. He had given him Neville's Citroen.

Or of course there was no forensic evidence in the first place? Which would mean he is innocent?

[Adam]

Or of course there was no forensic evidence in the first place? Which would mean he is innocent?

 

[lookout]

Or of course there was no forensic evidence in the first place? Which would mean he is innocent?

Yaaaaaayyyy.

[Jan]

Jeremy's supporters are often claiming he would not have the opportunity to dispose of his massacre night clothes. Am I missing something ?

The clothes may not have ended up with much blood anyway. June, Sheila and the twins were shot without resistance. By a long rifle. So unlikely that any back splatter would hit Jeremy. THAT WOULD EXPLAIN WHY NO BLOOD SPLATTER ON SHEILA _ WELL DONE ADAM!

Neville also received his first four shots from a distance. There was a kitchen fight, but unless they were rolling around on the floor, Jeremy would have remained virtually blood free. Certainly most of it would go after a washing machine spin. He may have even met the police without changing. Just putting extra layers on. He was well clothed for August.  GREAT - THAT COVERS SHEILA AS WELL.

Anyway if he was covered in blood, he had a month to dispose of the evidence. During this time he went on several jolly ups with Brett, Julie and other buddies. To London, Eastbourne, Amsterdam & St Tropez. So could have disposed of clothes anywhere in England, or in two other countries. NO HE DID NOT- THE POLICE AFTER SEEING WHAT YOU THINK IS A STAGED BODY COULD HAVE BEEN THERE IN HOURS AND SEEN ALL OF HIS WET CLOTHES - OH DEAR

Or he could even dispose of the clothes on the night. He knew the farm land very well.  NEVER BEEN FOUND THOUGH HAVE THEY - DID HE CYCLE BACK WITH NO CLOTHES AFTER HE DISPOSED OF THEM?

Claiming Jeremy could not have got clothes which may have had a few spots of blood on through customs, is also weak. Customs only check the inside of very few suitcases. They are looking for drugs, not blood. The London/Amsterdam customs were pretty weak as Jeremy smuggled a lot of cannabis through, just after the massacre. - WHO SAID THAT?

Do other people think Jeremy did or did not have plenty of time to dispose of clothes ?

THERE IS NO EVIDENCE OF HIM DISPOSING CLOTHES OR SHOES ON THE NIGHT WHICH HE WOULD HAVE PLANNED TO DO.

[Mr. Gee]

THERE IS NO EVIDENCE OF HIM DISPOSING CLOTHES OR SHOES ON THE NIGHT WHICH HE WOULD HAVE PLANNED TO DO.

This is a bit like discussing the Emperor's new clothes isn't it?

[Jan]

I love it though see my other comments - it explains why Sheila had no blood on her nightie! except for hers.

[Adam]

It is much more likely Sheila would end up with blood and marks after a fight with Neville.

The judge said Neville put up a tremendous fight for life. He was able to restrain Sheila with one arm BW said. So surprised she had no marks.

Jeremy was much bigger and fitter. And also fully clothed. If he did end up with blood he had a month to dispose of the clothes.

People have often said Jeremy could not get clothes through customs. The last time on Sunday.

[mertol22]

It is not in the realms of logic not to believe this would have been among the early questions put to Jeremy where no clothes are present then yes you have reason to question .

[Jan]

It is much more likely Sheila would end up with blood and marks after a fight with Neville.

The judge said Neville put up a tremendous fight for life. He was able to restrain Sheila with one arm BW said. So surprised she had no marks.

Jeremy was much bigger and fitter. And also fully clothed. If he did end up with blood he had a month to dispose of the clothes.

People have often said Jeremy could not get clothes through customs. The last time on Sunday.

He could have been beaten AFTER he was shot and if there was a fight it would apply to EITHER Assailant.

And you have obviously had no experience whatsoever of a person with the illness that Sheila had.

And stop going on about he had a month- HE DID NOT.
ANNE was watching him from day one and the police could have searched his house the next day.

[Mr. Gee]

It is much more likely Sheila would end up with blood and marks after a fight with Neville.

The judge said Neville put up a tremendous fight for life. He was able to restrain Sheila with one arm BW said. So surprised she had no marks.

Jeremy was much bigger and fitter. And also fully clothed. If he did end up with blood he had a month to dispose of the clothes.

People have often said Jeremy could not get clothes through customs. The last time on Sunday.

What a load of rubbish.

[Adam]

He could have been beaten AFTER he was shot and if there was a fight it would apply to EITHER Assailant.

And you have obviously had no experience whatsoever of a person with the illness that Sheila had.

And stop going on about he had a month- HE DID NOT.
ANNE was watching him from day one and the police could have searched his house the next day.

Did Ann Eaton go to Eastbourne, London, Amsterdam & St Tropez with him ? 

Oh sorry I forgot, customs would single him out, open his suitcase & arrest him after searching his clothes and seeing drops of dried blood. Who said so ? Grahame & Nugs.  . Didn't know he had to go through customs to go to Eastbourne and London anyway.

He was beaten after getting his four upstairs bullets. But put up a tremendous fight for life. So surprising that Sheila in a flimsy nightie didn't have a mark on her.

[Adam]

Jeremy needs more.

The CCRC are not going to refer the case to the COA if Jeremy claims he did not have time to dispose of clothes which may/may not have had incriminating evidence on.