Did Jeremy wear a wet suit for the massacre ?

[Adam]

The 'Behind Mansion Walls' video suggested Jeremy wore a wet suit when committing the massacre. This is not implausible. Robert Boutflour also suggested this.

He was a keen diver and wanted to be a commercial diver, rather than a farmer after hearing about the money they earn. So no doubt had a wet suit or two available.

He will still be mobile in a wet suit, after all divers and surfers wear them.

A black wet suit will make him harder to spot in the dark. Although it was likely to be underneath other clothes.

A wetsuit is also good body protection. As the rubber is quite thick.

It will also be easy to wash any incriminating evidence off after committing the massacre. Although as he was gallivanting around Europe for a month after the massacre, had plenty of time to dispose of incriminating evidence.

The police commented how smart Jeremy looked upon arrival at WHF. With several layers of clothing. Certainly not as if he had just got out of bed & rushed over. So it can't be ruled out that he wore these same clothes for the massacre.

I don't believe he also wore swimming goggles & flippers on the night. But may well have had a balaclava & gloves on to protect his face and hands from potential injuries.

Do other people believe Jeremy wore a wet suit on the night ?

[Mr. Gee]

The 'Behind Mansion Walls' video suggested Jeremy wore a wet suit when committing the massacre. This is not implausible.

He was a keen diver and wanted to be a commercial diver, rather than a farmer after hearing about the money they earn. So no doubt had a wet suit or two available.

He will still be mobile in a wet suit, after all divers and surfers wear them.

A black wet suit will make him harder to spot in the dark.

It will also be easy to wash any incriminating evidence off after committing the massacre. Although as he was gallivanting around Europe for a month after the massacre so had plenty of time to dispose of incriminating evidence.

The police commented how smart Jeremy looked upon arrival at WHF. With several layers of clothing. Certainly not as if he had just got out of bed & rushed over. So it can't be ruled out that he wore these same clothes for the massacre.

I don't believe he wore swimming goggles & flippers on the night. But may well have had a balaclava & gloves on to protect his face from potential injuries.

Do other people believe Jeremy wore a wet suit on the night ?

I'm still waiting for you to use the common sense you were born with Adam. Why would he wear a wetsuit? I think perhaps you need to understand the difference between a wet suit and a dry suit. I dry suit is completely impervious to water. A wet suit on the other hand is what its name suggests, a "wet" suit.
The idea of wearing a wet suit is so that when it gets wet it creates a warm layer of water between the body and the wet suit. This is why surfers use them, so they won't get cold and get hypothermia.
Now in order to operate as it is supposed to it must therefore be absorbent. That means that any liquid whether it be water or blood can easily be absorbed.
So imagine if Jeremy put on a wetsuit to do the murders, what protection would he have gotten if he was splashed with blood? None whatsoever, because it would soak straight through and stain whateve was underneath. So from logical point of view I would be quite confident in stating, no he would not have worn a wetsuit if he were to commit murder that night.

[Patti]

No I do not believe he did. I think Grahame has some valid points in the differences between a dry suit and a wet suit.

I think Jeremy had two and both were forensically tested and produced nothing. I am sure Aunt Agatha has still got one of them.

I was going to tell you a short story about my wetsuit.....but change me mind. 

[Adam]

I'm still waiting for you to use the common sense you were born with Adam. Why would he wear a wetsuit? I think perhaps you need to understand the difference between a wet suit and a dry suit. I dry suit is completely impervious to water. A wet suit on the other hand is what its name suggests, a "wet" suit.
The idea of wearing a wet suit is so that when it gets wet it creates a warm layer of water between the body and the wet suit. This is why surfers use them, so they won't get cold and get hypothermia.
Now in order to operate as it is supposed to it must therefore be absorbent. That means that any liquid whether it be water or blood can easily be absorbed.
So imagine if Jeremy put on a wetsuit to do the murders, what protection would he have gotten if he was splashed with blood? None whatsoever, because it would soak straight through and stain whateve was underneath. So from logical point of view I would be quite confident in stating, no he would not have worn a wetsuit if he were to commit murder that night.

I have reported this post to the moderators. The first sentence is very rude and offensive. This is a discussion forum, not an abuse site.

You may have joined this site a long time ago when everyone agreed with the pro Jeremy stance. But now you are in the minority, most people believing Bamber is guilty. So don't know why you think you have the right to insult people. 

I will continue doing this whenever you make offensive comments. Either to me or anyone else.

[Adam]

Other comments made yesterday by Grahame in just three pages.

'Gullible'

'Break out of you're tiny world'.

'Black & white minstrel'.

'Free yourself of self delusion'.

'Slave to you're own thoughts'.

'Blinded by predjudice'.

'You still haven't got it'.

'Polarised brain'.

'Inability to think rational thoughts'.

'Impotent'

'Shallow thought pattern'.

'Losing the plot'.

'A fool already'

Ban the bugger.

'Not worthy to be in a civilised society'.

[Adam]

I will investigate wet suits & their benefits. Rather than just go by Grahame's say so. Unless he's a surfer or an expert in what to wear for crimes.

I don't know why a well known reporter would say on a TV programme Jeremy would wear a wet suit to commit the massacre,  if it was of no use.

[Adam]

No I do not believe he did. I think Grahame has some valid points in the differences between a dry suit and a wet suit.

I think Jeremy had two and both were forensically tested and produced nothing. I am sure Aunt Agatha has still got one of them.

I was going to tell you a short story about my wetsuit.....but change me mind. 

Have you got a source that his wet suits were tested ?

[Mr. Gee]

I have reported this post to the moderators. The first sentence is very rude and offensive. This is a discussion forum, not an abuse site.

You may have joined this site a long time ago when everyone agreed with the pro Jeremy stance. But now you are in the minority, most people believing Bamber is guilty. So don't know why you think you have the right to insult people. 

I will continue doing this whenever you make offensive comments. Either to me or anyone else.

Best to be in a minority and right rather than stand with fools whilst the world burns. I suggest you look to your own morals before self righteously dictating to me lad. You and your owner scipio get away with far too much for my liking. I am just balancing the books.

[Mr. Gee]

I have reported this post to the moderators. The first sentence is very rude and offensive. This is a discussion forum, not an abuse site.

You may have joined this site a long time ago when everyone agreed with the pro Jeremy stance. But now you are in the minority, most people believing Bamber is guilty. So don't know why you think you have the right to insult people. 

I will continue doing this whenever you make offensive comments. Either to me or anyone else.

I trust that you will also include scipio's insting comments as well, or is your little scheme just dedicated to my insults?

[Mr. Gee]

I will investigate wet suits & their benefits. Rather than just go by Grahame's say so. Unless he's a surfer or an expert in what to wear for crimes.

I don't know why a well known reporter would say on a TV programme Jeremy would wear a wet suit to commit the massacre,  if it was of no use.

Perhaps it is because he is an idiot and is just writing so gullible people believe him. If you do not believe me who used to go diving then ask Bridget as she used to go diving as well. In fact ask any other expert, unless of course you want to remain wallowing in your ignorance?

[lookout]

Perhaps it is because he is an idiot and is just writing so gullible people believe him. If you do not believe me who used to go diving then ask Bridget as she used to go diving as well. In fact ask any other expert, unless of course you want to remain wallowing in your ignorance?

Best leave people like Adam in his ignorance-------------it's bliss !

[Mr. Gee]

Best leave people like Adam in his ignorance-------------it's bliss !

Like a number of guilters he refuses to believe that we have various experts on the forum. But prefers to believe that just because someone is a stranger and says their an expert that their word must carry more weight than any expert on the forum.

[lookout]

Like a number of guilters he refuses to believe that we have various experts on the forum. But prefers to believe that just because someone is a stranger and says their an expert that their word must carry mopre weight than any expert on the forum.

It's the sheer non-acceptance that Sheila was a possibility in causing the deaths of her family that doesn't seem to register with the guilters. Of course had the jury been offered the full diagnosis of Sheila,etc,then maybe there'd have been a pause for thought on how it would have been possible to have murdered 4 people.

Only today in the paper,it's been reported that the woman suffering from depression--------not schizophrenia or anything akin to that, who suffocated her 3 children and then attempted suicide,has been ordered to a mental hospital until such times as she's " cured ".

Sheila not only had depression,but other problems with her mental health plus drug-taking which exacerbated her overall condition and counteracted the effects of her prescription medication thus making her treatment null and void.

[Jan]

I have reported this post to the moderators. The first sentence is very rude and offensive. This is a discussion forum, not an abuse site.

You may have joined this site a long time ago when everyone agreed with the pro Jeremy stance. But now you are in the minority, most people believing Bamber is guilty. So don't know why you think you have the right to insult people. 

I will continue doing this whenever you make offensive comments. Either to me or anyone else.

Thats fair enough Adam  and we will in turn report your posts when they get offensive as well.

[Jan]

"He will still be mobile in a wet suit, after all divers and surfers wear them".


they wear them under water ! not cycling across a field.


Oh no forgot - no forensics on the bike either